UN Demands ‘Global Governance’ for ‘Humanity’

UN Demands ‘Global Governance’ for ‘Humanity’
Frank Bergman
Sep 27, 2024

Unelected globalist organization the United Nations (UN) is demanding that governments of sovereign nations submit to “global governance” in order to supposedly protect “humanity” from artificial intelligence (AI).

The demand was made in a report published by the UN’s “High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence.”

The report, titled “Governing AI for Humanity,” insists that a single global government is vital to keep the emerging technology under control.

The 99-page document issues warnings about the threats from AI and details the UN’s plan for establishing global governance,

The UN also warns that individual sovereign nations have gaps in global governance as it relates to AI and issues a call to action for governments to enhance global cooperation.

It summarizes its claims as to the necessity of globalism early on.

In Chapter 2 “The Need for Global Governance” on page 37, the report expounds on its demand for globalism.

“The imperative of global governance, in particular, is irrefutable,” the report declares on page 7.

“There is, today, a global governance deficit with respect to AI.”

The document claims that AI is not understood by anyone and warns that no one is accountable for it.

“Moreover, no one currently understands all of AI’s inner workings enough to fully control its outputs or predict its evolution,” the report claims.

“Nor are decision-makers held accountable for developing, deploying, or using systems they do not understand.

“Meanwhile, negative spillovers and downstream impacts resulting from such decisions are also likely to be global.”

The document goes on to say that national governments or private companies cannot be allowed to regulate AI.

Rather, a single global government must now have control over sovereign nations.

“The development, deployment, and use of such a technology cannot be left to the whims of markets alone,” the document asserts.

“National governments and regional organizations will be crucial, but the very nature of the technology itself – transboundary in structure and application – necessitates a global approach.

“Governance can also be a key enabler for AI innovation for the SDGs globally.”

One key theme of the document is the repeated claim that AI must comply with the UN’s globalist “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDG).

This is repeated throughout the report.

Furthermore, the document calls for the establishment of global AI “governance regimes”

These “regimes” must have control over the entire planet, accoridn gto the UN.

The document declares on page 8:

“AI governance regimes must also span the globe to be effective — effective in averting ‘AI arms races’ or a ‘race to the bottom’ on safety and rights, in detecting and responding to incidents emanating from decisions along AI’s life cycle which span multiple jurisdictions, in spurring learning, in encouraging interoperability, and in sharing AI’s benefits.

“The technology is borderless and, as it spreads, the illusion that any one State or group of States could (or should) control it will diminish.”

The document argues that the global government allegedly needed to protect “humanity” from this technology must be based on the current philosophies of the United Nations.

These philosophies were summed up in another document from September called “The Pact for the Future.”

“The Pact for the Future” also pushes for global government in all areas of life, not just AI.

In addition, the taxpayer-funded United Nations proposes a “global fund for AI” which pools research from entities including global vaccine industry organizations.

“The fund’s operating model should be informed by lessons from pooled international research and development collaborations, such as CERN and [Bill Gates’s] Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, as well as lessons from commercial platforms for timeshared infrastructure,” Governing AI for Humanity said on page 67.

The report concludes by personalizing the global government agenda to the reader by using humanizing terms that evoke an emotional response.

“The High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence, convened by the United Nations Secretary-General, will undertake analysis and advance recommendations for the international governance of artificial intelligence,” the report states on page 80.

“The Body’s initial reports will provide high-level expert and independent contributions to ongoing national, regional, and multilateral debates.

“The Body will consist of 38 members from governments, private sector, civil society, and academia, as well as a member Secretary.

“Its composition will be balanced by gender, age, geographic representation, and area of expertise related to the risks and applications of artificial intelligence.

“The members of the Body will serve in their personal capacity.”