Because that might have exposed what AI really is, another “mind control” tool for leftists & deep state to manipulate the idiots.
A computer run society. What could possibly go wrong?
It wrongly focused on the “most expensive and large-scale” AI models, while “smaller, specialized models”. We wouldn't want to curtail the big corporations' influence or the damage their systems could wreak eh?
I knew that the President reserves a veto power for any bills that Congress might pass that the President disagrees with along with a constitutional power to grant reprieves and pardons, but holy sh*t every state and territorial governor as well?
Is this how you run a democracy ... investing these sweeping powers in individuals that could undermine the will of the majority? Some "democracy" you have there and it is obviously the reason that the UNSC is also an undemocratic body, permitting the US as one of the 5 permanent members of the council to veto every single UNSC resolution realting to Israel ... presumably on the insistence of the United States. If this is the democracy Americans crow about, I think they've been sold a lemon, but then again, their society is based on a buyer beware principle, and most consumers are morons.
Another attempt to protect large corporations from requirement that cost money, protecting them from uprising smaller firms. Just look at US' law for organic food, where wealthy corporations are allowed a larger content of non-organic food than smaller companies, but still are allowed to call it organic. This is with the lame excuse that such (very rich) corporations produce quantities so large that they (in spite of their investment powers) may have trouble to get enough organically grown ingredients. And this is only one already existing example. This fact is besides possible opinions about the validity of organic food. I is a profit scam to satisfy greedy investors, including illegal politicians' insider trading.
You can tell when a State Governor has a vested interest in a particulate tech in Newsom's case it's AI. So he veto's safety whilst spouting this fantastic bit of gobbledy gook “informed” initiatives based on “empirical trajectory analysis. ow much of a back hander do you get Mr Newsom ?
The first legislation isn't going to be perfect & will need to be a work in progress as more is learned about the new technology. Protecting whistle blowers is not good for the narrative!
I think "A.I." is nothing but a grift. It's a computer, doing what computers are programmed to do. As I type this, millions of idiots are "investing" in A.I. They will see their money disappear, and the con men will be nowhere to be found. A.I.? MY ASS!
Newsome is an android himself. Silicone valley pays more than half of California's bills. Money talks $$$ of course he won't restrain them.
What was made illegal? AI tends to be rational and realistic and not follow the party line. Both political parties pander to human greed and are delusional and insane. I can see why government would want to regulate AI, there is calls for it in the IEEE computational intelligence magazines that are kinda.. wacky (so I quit the IEEE as it has become woke political and social propaganda). On the other hand AI can be used to unconstitutionally invade my privacy better than the government currently does.
From what the media reports, AI is based on tagged data. So who can modify the tagged data to appease the Government or a Corporation? So how is this different than censorship and propaganda today? You will find out too late.
Main rule: AI is not allowed to tell the truth about the jews.
Weiner is a disgusting homosexual jew, giving his all to mold California into his own degenerate, perverted image. Given a choice between a disgusting homosexual jew or a robot, I stand with the robot who says "stranger danger, faghut!".
In sum no testing required like the ''safe'' and ''effective'' mRNA deadly excrement produced by criminal big pharma. Yeap imagine PentaGun buying A.I. system controlling the ICBM nuclear war heads without testing or a kill switch... LOL USA IS EVIL.
First US safety bill for AI vetoed
The legislation would have required tech firms to test artificial intelligence models before release
30 Sep, 2024
The proposed regulation would have obliged tech companies with powerful AI models to subject them to safety testing
before releasing them to the public, as well as publicly disclosing the models’ safety protocols. This would have been
done in order to prevent the models from being manipulated into causing harm, such as hacking strategically important infrastructure.
In a message accompanying the veto on Sunday, the governor said that while the proposal was “well-intentioned,” it wrongly focused on the “most expensive and large-scale” AI models, while “smaller, specialized models” could potentially cause more harm. Newsom also argued that the bill does not take into account in what environment an Al system is deployed or whether it involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data.
“Instead, the bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions... I do not believe this is the best approach to protecting the public from real threats posed by the technology,” the governor stated. Newsom stressed that he agrees the industry must be regulated, but called for more “informed” initiatives based on “empirical trajectory analysis of Al systems and capabilities.”
“Ultimately, any framework for effectively regulating Al needs to keep pace with the technology itself… Given the stakes – protecting against actual threats without unnecessarily thwarting the promise of this technology to advance the public good – we must get this right,” he concluded.
As California governor, Newsom is seen as playing an important role in the nascent AI regulation process. According to his office’s figures, the state is home to 32 of the world’s “50 leading AI companies.”
The bill’s author, state Senator Scott Weiner, called the veto “a setback” for those who “believe in oversight of massive corporations that are making critical decisions” affecting public safety. He pledged to continue working on the legislation.
The bill had drawn mixed reactions from tech firms, researchers, and lawmakers. While some viewed it as paving the way towards country-wide regulations on the industry, others argued that it could stifle the development of AI. Former US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi branded the proposal “well-intentioned but ill informed.”
Meanwhile, scores of employees of several leading AI firms, such as OpenAI, Anthropic and Google’s DeepMind, supported the bill, because it added whistleblower protections for those who speak up about the risks in the AI models their companies are developing.
No comments:
Post a Comment