Climate Crisis’ narrative was ‘created’ to please Democrat donors

Trump’s VP Pick J.D Vance : ‘Climate Crisis’ Narrative Was ‘Created’ to Please Democrat Donors, Chinese Elites
Frank Bergman
July 16, 2024

Republican vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance has warned that the “climate crisis” narrative was “created” by powerful elites who donate to the Democratic Party.

President Donald Trump’s running mate argues that claims of a “crisis” seek to stoke fear among members of the public to push them “to buy more Chinese-manufactured electric vehicles.”

During Monday’s first day of the Republican National Convention, Trump, who narrowly avoided death when he was shot during a failed assassination attempt on Saturday, announced Vance as his running mate for the November election.

Now that the battle for Trump’s VP is over, many are taking a closer look at Sen. Vance (R-OH) and where he stands on certain positions.

When it comes to “climate change,” Vance is extremely dismissive of the globalist green agenda.

Vance’s energy and environmental agenda in the Senate has aligned closely with the Republican Party.

“Even if there was a climate crisis, I don’t know how the way to solve it is to buy more Chinese-manufactured electric vehicles,” he said in 2022.

He warns that the idea of an environmental crisis was “created” to please Democratic Party donors and Chinese elites.

Two years earlier, Vance said society had a “climate problem.”

He argues that Western nations have been under pressure to reduce “emissions,” while China, the largest polluter in the world, gets a free pass.

In recent years, as the nation continues to expand, China has only drastically increased its fossil fuel use.

In fact, China is listed as contributing 26% of the global “greenhouse gas emissions.”

China also produces more emissions than the rest of the top five polluting countries combined.

Yet, China is not under any pressure from the globalist World Economic Forum (WEF) and the United Nations (UN) to meet their “Net Zero” goals.

In response, Vance has sought to put significant blame on China for greenhouse gas emissions.

In a 2023 hearing with Kevin Welsh, the Federal Aviation Administration’s top official for environmental policy, Vance criticized the Biden administration’s endorsement of climate policies from the International Civil Aviation Organization.

He also dismissed carbon offsets in aviation as “climate reparations.”

“Why are we doing so much to follow ICAO’s recommendations, when the Chinese themselves are not doing very much?” Vance asked.

“When you think about the fact that China is the dirtiest economy in the world — they emit about two times as much carbon as we do — why are we effectively penalizing the American aviation while we don’t require, or even attempt, to force the Chinese to do the same to their aviation industry?”

Vance, an author and former venture capitalist, last year introduced the “Drive American Act,” S. 2962.

The bill would repeal the federal tax credit for electric vehicles and instead offer tax credits for U.S.-made vehicles powered only by gasoline or diesel.

He also introduced legislation to double the maximum penalties for climate change protesters and others who target exhibits at the Smithsonian Institution and National Gallery of Art.

Vance has opposed and sought to scrutinize EPA regulations, including on gasoline-powered generators.

He’s also warned that “environmental justice” is just an excuse to offshore American jobs.

Vance has called Democrats’ climate agenda “dumb” and warned that it is a “handout to Chinese companies at the expense of Ohio workers.”

He recently told Politico’s E&E News that if some local companies support certain Inflation Reduction Act provisions, lawmakers might want to keep them instead of repealing the entire law.

“The Inflation Reduction Act is mostly a lot of green energy stuff,” said Vance.

“And I think it’s made our economy less energy independent.

“It’s also added a lot of costs out there and a lot of federal spending that’s forced the inflation prices.

“And I also think that it’s sort of hastening a transition away from things like the gas-driven cars that most Americans don’t want.

“So I think there’s a lot of bad policy in there.

“Also a lot of inflationary policy in there.

“And I’d like to see a lot of it gotten rid of.”

Green agenda advocates who support Biden quickly denounced Trump’s choice of Vance as his running mate.

David Kieve, president of EDF Action, complained about Vance running for vice president in a statement.

EDF Action is the advocacy arm of the Environmental Defense Fund.

“Donald Trump’s anti-climate, anti-environment agenda is reinforced with his pick of J.D. Vance as the Republican vice-presidential nominee,” Kieve said in a statement.

Lori Lodes, executive director of the group Climate Power, said:

“J.D. Vance is Donald Trump’s dream come true — a climate denier who is all too happy to do Big Oil’s bidding and pad their profits at the expense of working people.”

CHEMTRAILS : A Bush Family Business?

The Abstract episode 34 “CHEMTRAILS: A Bush Family Business?”
June 16, 2024
By Peter A. Kirby

Besides their bosses the Rockefellers (whom we will cover next week), there is no other family with more known connections to today’s chemtrail spraying operations than the Bush family. Due to their well-established involvement with the CIA, the CFR, the Nazis, Enron, the New World Order, secret societies, assassinations, weapons trafficking, financial fraud, drug trafficking, bioweapons, and more, I don’t figure that you are too surprised. Yup, spraying tens of thousands of megatons of toxic waste over unsuspecting Americans would not be a stretch for the house that Bush built. In fact, it would be right up their ally. For the whole story here, please read my book Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project. My book has been under troll attack lately, so please write a review. Thanks.

Bush and the Nazis

As detailed in the author’s book and as will be detailed in a future episode of The Abstract, the WWII Nazi regime has a plethora of connections to today’s chemtrail spraying operations. For one, after the war many former Nazi scientists were secretly imported into the United States and subsequently went to work on different programs germane (no pun intended) to the New Manhattan Project. Unsurprisingly then, when one looks for connections between the Bush family and the Nazis, one finds plenty.

The Bush family bank, Brown Brothers Harriman funded the Nazis from their hate-filled, war-mongering beginnings to long after they invaded Poland. It doesn’t end there. On Oct. 20, 1942, 10 months after the U.S. had entered the war, under the Trading with the Enemy Act, the U.S. government took over the Union Banking Corporation of which Prescott Bush (1895-1972) was a director. Three of the shareholders who had their shares seized were Nazis. Two other businesses associated with the Union Banking Corporation were also seized. The following month, the Nazi interests invested in the Silesian-American Corporation, a company long managed by Senator Prescott Bush, were seized under the Trading with the Enemy Act as well. It gets darker. Roger Stone, in his book Jeb! And the Bush Crime Family suggests that old Prescott Bush (Bush Senior’s daddy) was getting his hands very dirty in Nazi Germany. Stone writes, “According to a Dutch intelligence agent, Prescott Bush managed a portion of the slave labor force from Auschwitz.” The Bush family has all sorts of other connections to the Nazis involving people and organizations such as: William Stamps Farish, William Stamps Farish III, Fritz Thyssen, William H. Draper, Jr., William H. Draper III, the Rockefellers, I.G. Farben, Standard Oil, Hermann Schmitz, and the U.S. Agency for International Development.

The Bush family also has ties to the original WWII Manhattan Project. Now that’s called playing both sides and that’s how the old boy network does it. Senator Prescott Bush sat on the board of directors of something called the Vanadium Corporation which supplied unrefined uranium to the Manhattan Project. Prescott Bush also sat on the board of directors of Dresser Industries which produced special pumps used in the production of the refined uranium needed for the world’s first atomic bombs.

Bush and Dresser Industries

Through their family bank Brown Brothers Harriman, the Bush family owns the world’s largest harvester of coal fly ash: Dresser Industries. This is notable because it has been scientifically determined that we are being routinely sprayed with coal fly ash. It is collected by the electrostatic precipitators manufactured and maintained by Dresser Industries. For more about this please see my recent article and video “Why Coal Fly Ash?”

Dresser’s company history goes back to the late 1800s and they have historically worked with organizations heavily associated with the New Manhattan Project. Dresser Industries, like the Bush family itself, also has many Nazi connections. Is Dresser Industries providing the coal fly ash needed for today’s New Manhattan Project?

Way back in 1928, the Bush family bank bought Dresser. At the time, Dresser was a moderately large and successful business mostly engaged in oilfield production and distribution equipment. Senator Prescott S. Bush (grandaddy Bush) and his cronies from W. A. Harriman and Company turned it into an international behemoth. Grandaddy Bush later passed his regard for Dresser onto his son, George H. W. Bush (Bush Sr.). As we all know, Bush Sr. is now dead. Perhaps Dresser’s mantle has since been passed to George W. Bush (Bush Jr.). W. A. Harriman and Company is known today as Brown Brothers Harriman; one of the largest private banks in the world and one of the banks closest to the private United States Federal Reserve Bank which makes sure that Brown Brothers Harriman gets only the freshest (and most valuable) capital. The author has seen no evidence indicating that the Bush family or their Brown Brothers Harriman bank has since divested itself from Dresser. Brown Brothers Harriman is a bank known to have done substantial business with Nazi Germany.

Dresser Industries has many connections to today’s New Manhattan Project. First of all, as noted, Dresser’s Pacific Pump Works produced equipment which enabled the scientists of the original Manhattan Project to refine the uranium used in the world’s first atomic bombs. With the dawning of the Space Age, Dresser positioned itself for work in areas connected to the New Manhattan Project. In 1957, about a month after Sputnik scared the pants off of the Pentagon, Dresser created a division known as Dresser Dynamics and they were positioned to develop new missile navigation technologies. The air traffic control systems of today’s New Manhattan Project partially originated from early automated missile battery systems. Another Dresser division produced over-the-horizon radar equipment – technology succinctly applicable to the New Manhattan Project. Dresser has also worked extensively with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the Atomic Energy Commission; two organizations with strong implications for the New Manhattan Project (NMP). Dresser’s division known as Dresser Electronics did work at New Mexico’s White Sands Missile Range: the site of the world’s first atomic bomb blast and the original home of the most significant group of former Nazi scientists working with General Electric in areas relevant to the NMP. Many of Dresser’s top executives have historically come from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) – an institution with only the most significant implications for the New Manhattan Project. Dresser is still around today. They are now known as Dresser-Rand, a Siemens Business. Siemens is a former Nazi company.

Bush and Enron

Enron was another large corporation with extensive ties to the Bush family and tangible implications for today’s chemtrail spraying operations. Specifically, a financial market that rises and falls with the weather known as the ‘weather derivatives market’ was invented by Enron. This is significant because the evidence indicates that today’s New Manhattan Project is primarily a global weather modification program.

The famously scandalous Enron’s headquarters were in Houston, TX. The Bushes are famously from Texas as well. The Bushes actually started in the northeast and migrated to Texas, just like the NMP did. For more about how development of the NMP shifted from the northeast to the southwest, please see the author’s article and video “Chemtrails Exposed: The Post-War Development of the New Manhattan Project.”

The Bushes referred to Enron’s CEO Ken Lay as ‘ol’ Kenny Boy.’ With $1.8M donated to Republicans during the 2000 presidential campaign, Lay was Bush Jr.’s number one donor and after the election he attended secret meetings as one of Jr.’s personal advisors. The Bush Jr. administration’s protection of electricity deregulation helped Enron realize a $87M gain in profits during the first quarter of Bush Jr.’s reign. The connections between the Bushes and Enron simply go on and on. For more details, please refer to the author’s book.

Most relevant to this discussion though is the fact that Enron started the weather derivatives market. This is a financial market where one may place wagers on just about any future geophysical condition such as: rainfall, wind speed, temperature and more. If one has foreknowledge of weather modification activities and the effects thereof, then one can make a killing in the weather derivatives market. That would be financial fraud, but being that we are living through the era of fraud, such activity is firmly within the realm of possibilities. The weather derivatives market will be covered extensively in yet another upcoming article and video, so please stay tuned. If you need to know more about it now, the weather derivatives market is currently detailed in my book.

Bush and the Carlyle Group

The Carlyle Group is a defense contractor private equity firm and one of the Bush family’s main family businesses. Nazi collaborator George Soros is famously invested in the Carlyle Group. What more does one need to know? Here’s more: In 1992 the Carlyle Group bought a portion of a company heavily implicated in the NMP called Ling-Temco-Vought (LTV). Among other connections to the NMP, Ling-Temco-Vought had created a spin-off called LTV Electrosystems which became E-systems before it built HAARP. Therefore, the Carlyle Group may have been involved in the production and delivery of technological military hardware needed to produce today’s New Manhattan Project. For more about Ling-Temco-Vought, E-systems, HAARP and their roles in the NMP, please refer to my book.

Bush and the CIA

This is basically a teaser. The Central Intelligence Agency’s connections to the New Manhattan Project are far too extensive to cover here. But being that Bush Sr. was the head of the CIA in 1976, it should be noted in this article that Bush family business Dresser Industries has worked frequently with the CIA. Prescott Bush (Bush Sr.’s daddy) was a member of the Dresser Industries board of directors for 22 years until 1952 when he entered the United States Senate. Once there, Senator Prescott Bush became Allen Dulles’ day-to-day CIA contact man. That’s just scratching the surface. In the coming weeks I intend to publish an article and video going over all of the connections between the CIA and the New Manhattan Project. Please stay tuned.

    GeoengineeringWatch.org
    ClimateViewer.com
    NoGeoingegneria.com
    StopSprayingCalifornia.com
    ChemSky.org
    NuclearPlanet.com
    GlobalSkyWatch.com
    ChemtrailsProject.com
    ChemtrailsProjectUK.com

Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, author, and activist. Please buy his books Chemtrails Exposed: A New Manhattan Project and The Fall of San Francisco available now exclusively at Amazon. Also please join his email list at his website PeterAKirby.com

The story of Khayzuran & Zubayda

The story of Khayzuran is one of rags to riches, but Zubayda was born into nearly limitless luxury.

The historian al-Masudi writes that on state occasions Zubayda “could scarcely walk under the weight of her jewelry and dresses.” She endowed more charitable works for pilgrims to Makkah than any ruler of her era.

From Indonesia to Pakistan, Kyrgyzstan to Nigeria, Senegal to Turkey, it is not particularly rare in our own times for women in Muslim-majority countries to be appointed and elected to high offices—including heads of state. Nor has it ever been.

Stretching back more than 14 centuries to the advent of Islam, women have held positions among many ruling elites, from malikas, or queens, to powerful advisors. Some ascended to rule in their own right; others rose as regents for incapacitated husbands or male successors yet too young for a throne. Some proved insightful administrators, courageous military commanders or both; others differed little from equally flawed male potentates who sowed the seeds of their own downfalls.

Malika I: Khayzuran & Zubayda

Written by Tom Verde

Aramco, January/February 2016

The story of Khayzuran is one of rags to riches, captivity to sovereignty. Born in the southwestern part of the Arabian Peninsula around the middle of the eighth century, a bit more than 100 years after the death of Prophet Muhammad, she was kidnapped by slave traders while still a child. Sometime between 758 and 765, she was sold in Makkah to none other than the founder of Baghdad, Abbasid Caliph al-Mansur, who gave her to his son and successor, al-Mahdi. 

She bore al-Mahdi a daughter and two sons, both of whom became caliphs—one the renowned Harun al-Rashid. By the time of her death in 789, her annual income had reached 160 million dirhams, which was roughly half of the entire state revenue, according to the 10th-century historian al-Masudi. Her personal wealth made her “undoubtedly, next to [her son Caliph Harun al-Rashid], the richest person in the Moslem world of her day,” observes historian Nabia Abbott, whose Two Queens of Baghdad: Mother and Wife of Harun al-Rashid is a seminal work in Middle Eastern women’s studies.

Khayzuran’s path to political power, like that of many women in the long era predating today’s nation-states, was via the royal haram, or women’s quarters. A favorite of al-Mahdi, she enjoyed a level of trust that rivaled, and may have exceeded, that of Rita, al-Mahdi’s first wife and cousin whose origins could not have differed more from Khayuran’s: Rita was a royal, the daughter of Abu Abbas Abdullah, founder of the Abbasid empire. 

A brief statement in al-Tabari’s monumental, ninth-century History of the Prophets and Kings shows al-Mahdi’s regard for his first lady of the haram: “In this year [775] al-Mahdi manumitted his slave girl … al-Khayzuran and married her.” At a time when caliphs were expected to marry fellow members of the aristocracy, elevating Khayzuran to queen was “a bold break with convention,” modern historian Hugh Kennedy has observed.

And not unsurprisingly, the medieval Arab chronicles indicate that this led to court intrigue: The high-born ladies of the Abbasid court sneered at Khayzuran’s presence, yet she is said to have deflected their snobbery with cordial grace. Though history provides no evidence of direct tension between Rita and Khayzuran, the fact that the latter’s sons—Musa al-Hadi and Harun al-Rashid—were named as heirs to the caliphate while the former’s were never even considered indicates Rita’s “tacit recognition of the futility of challenging” Khayzuran, Abbot speculates.

Described as “slender and graceful as a reed,” according to Abbott (khayzuran is Arabic for “reed”), she hardly relied on beauty alone for her success. She was intelligent, freely quoted poetry and studied the Qur’an, hadith (sayings of Prophet Muhammad) and law at the feet of leading scholars. 

She is also said to have enjoyed practical jokes and shared al-Mahdi’s sense of humor, such as privately mocking Caliph al-Mansur’s flashes of temper. Yet when it came to governing, she was all business: “At the opening of [her first son al-Hadi’s] caliphate, al-Khayzuran used to exercise her authority over him in all his affairs without consulting him at all ... assuming sole control over matters of ordaining and forbidding, just as she had done previously with his father,” al-Tabari remarks on al-Hadi’s accession upon al-Mahdi’s death in 785. 

The new caliph chafed at his mother’s dominance. Perhaps it was because al-Hadi didn’t live up to Khayzuran’s expectations, or perhaps he resented her long-standing preference for his younger brother, Harun al-Rashid. The discord did not last long: Al-Hadi died the following year. (Rumors circulated that Khayzuran had him poisoned, but there is no authoritative account.) Harun al-Rashid became caliph of an empire from Morocco to Persia and ushered in the zenith of the Abbasid era. When his mother died in 789, the caliph displayed the depths of his grief and devotion by helping to shoulder her bier, barefoot, through the mud.

The histories do not detail Khayzuran’s political achievements, but coins were struck in her name, palaces were named for her, and the cemetery in which subsequent Abbasid rulers were laid to rest also carried her name, all testifying not only to status but also to a civic largesse. Notably, she passed on this sense of civic duty to Amat al-Aziz, known to history by the unflattering if sonorous name Zubayda.

Zubayda was both Khayzuran’s niece and, after Zubayda’s marriage to Harun al-Rashid, her daughter-in-law. It was her grandfather, al-Mansur, who no doubt intended affection in nicknaming her Zubayda (which means “Little Butter Ball”) “on account of her plumpness” as a child, according to 13th-century biographer Ibn Khalikhan. 

As an adult, the chronicler goes on to say, her “charity was ample, her conduct virtuous.” He adds that in her chambers, a hundred slave girls tasked with memorizing the Qur’an recited one-tenth of it daily, “so that her palace resounded with a continual humming like that of bees.” 

Born into the lap of the extreme luxury of the Abbasid Empire at its zenith, Zubayda quickly developed extravagant tastes. According to al-Zubayr’s 11th-century Book of Gifts and Rarities—a sort of “Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous” of its day—the cost of her wedding, “the likes of which had never ... been seen in [Islamic] times,” ran to 50 million dinars. (For comparison, the annual cost of living for an average family in Baghdad was about 240 dinars.) The event featured a waistcoat encrusted with rubies and pearls “whose value could not be assessed” for the bride; guests received gifts of gold dinars in silver bowls and silver dinars in golden bowls.

A trendsetter of high style, Zubayda was “the first to introduce the fashion for slippers embroidered with precious stones and for candles made of ambergris—fashions which spread to the public,” according to al-Masudi. On state occasions, it was said, she “could scarcely walk under the weight of her jewelry and dresses,” and she had to be propped up by servants.

Yet she spent no less lavishly on public works, to her enduring renown. She made at least five pilgrimages to Makkah, as it was on her fifth, in 805, that she was distressed to see that drought had devastated the populace and reduced the sacred well of Zamzam to a mere trickle. She ordered that the well be deepened, and she spent nearly 2 million dinars improving the water supply of Makkah and the surrounding province.

This included the construction of an aqueduct from the spring of Hunayn, 95 kilometers to the east, as well as the famed “Spring of Zubayda” on the plain of Arafat, one of the ritual locations on the Hajj. When her engineers cautioned her about the expense, never mind the technical difficulties, she replied that she was determined to carry out the work “were every stroke of a pickax to cost a dinar,” according to Ibn Khalikhan. 

Beyond Makkah, she financed one of the greatest public-works projects of the era: construction of a 1,500-kilometer darb (road) from Kufa, south of Baghdad, all the way to Makkah, complete with water stations at regular intervals and hilltop fire beacons to guide travelers at night. Her contemporary historian al-Azraqi declares that “people of Makkah and the pilgrims owe their very life to [Zubayda] next to God,” and pilgrim cries of “God bless Zubayda” echoed for generations along the route that is still called Darb Zubayda. (It fell into disuse when pilgrims opted for rail, auto and air travel over camel caravans.) 

In a personally painful decision, in 813 Zubayda put the interests of the state ahead of her own flesh and blood by ultimately endorsing her stepson al-Ma’mun’s accession to caliph when her own son, Caliph al-Amin, became intolerably corrupt. Her instincts were on the mark, and the cultured al-Ma’mun proved to be a just and erudite ruler who founded Baghdad’s famed think tank, bayt al-hikma (house of wisdom), which became a center for the translation into Arabic of Greek, Roman and other classical texts that not only informed the Abbasid intellectual milieu, but also later became foundations of the European Renaissance. 

Zubayda died in 831, yet her reputation as a woman of influence lived on in both history and literature. Her husband, Harun al-Rashid, became the protagonist caliph in the European collection of alf layla wa layla (1001 Nights), and it was Zubayda who became the real-life basis for the very fictional Scheherazade.

BRICS offer hope in a time of war

Date with destiny - BRICS offer hope in a time of war

Pepe Escobar

“The context for what will be decided in Kazan this week is no less than incandescent, as the uncontrolled chaos of the Hegemon’s Forever Wars – from Ukraine to West Asia – has even materially affected the heavy work of BRICS and the necessity to build a new international system of geoeconomic relations practically from scratch,” says veteran international affairs observer Pepe Escobar, commenting on the imminent kickoff of the BRICS bloc’s long-awaited summit in Russia on October 22.
 
Citing bloc members’ broad agreement on ‘the need for a comprehensive reform of the global financial architecture to enhance the voice of developing countries and their representation’, Escobar stressed that when it comes to existing, Western-dominated institutions, “it remains clear the US has less than zero interest in a profound reform of the IMF, the World Bank and the Bretton Woods system.” Therefore, “Russia and China, especially, are fully aware that what is needed is a post-Bretton Woods.”
 
Listing off other major initiatives on the agenda in Kazan, including a cross-border payments initiative, the operation of the BRICS’ New Development Bank, dedollarization and the creation of new digital currencies’ related infrastructure, Escobar stressed that in geopolitics too, the summit is expected pump up the BRICS’ international profile, with a special session on Palestine a case in point.

“All of the above is highly significant for the BRICS context because the Forever Wars in West Asia have been seriously interfering with the work within BRICS. And on top of it, the Forever Wars, cold, hybrid, and hot, are in fact essentially directed against three BRICS members, Russia, Iran and China – not by accident described as the Top Three existential threats to the Hegemon.”  

“The stakes in Kazan could not be higher. By the end of the week the Global Majority will know whether Kazan will go down in History as the landmark of a new, emerging system of international relations, of if crass Divide and Rule tactics will keep postponing the inexorable demise of the Old Order,” Escobar summed up.

We May Have Overstated Danger Of COVID !

Everything was done intentionally knowing the facts behind them. It was pre-planned silent genocide!

England's Chief Medical Officer Admits "We May Have Overstated Danger Of COVID"
Authored by Kit Knightly via Off-Guardoan.org
Sep 28, 2024

England’s Chief Medical Officer testified before the (token and pointless)  Covid Inquiry earlier today, claiming he feared the government “overdid it” when talking up the dangers of Covid.

No kidding,  Chris.

The Telegraph reports [emphasis added]:

    The Government potentially overstated the danger of Covid to the public at the start of the pandemic, Prof Sir Chris Whitty has admitted.

    The Chief Medical Officer told the Covid Inquiry he still worries about whether the Government got “the level of concern” right as it introduced lockdowns and shielding measures.

    Sir Chris said it was a difficult balance and if anything it was possible that authorities “overdid it” when communicating how dangerous the virus was at the beginning of the pandemic.

Of course, this is all very British understatement combined with “official inquiry dilution”, which automatically transforms “I know we did X” into “I fear we may have done X by accident“.

Whitty doesn’t “think they potentially overstated the danger”, he knows they definitely did. We all do, it’s been pretty much proven.

“Covid” was a tapestry of lies, and a tangle of deliberately inflated statistics created specifically to enable those lies.

That’s all old news.

Yet Chris Whitty himself is a good example of a potentially interesting phenomenon.

From the beginning of the “pandemic” he seemed strangely  keen to distance himself from the very panic he was helping to create, and to, in pure Doublethink, underline the complete lack of danger from the so-called “deadly new disease”.

See this video, taken from a “Covid Briefing” on May 11th 2020:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adj8MCsZKlg

Now, that’s not to suggest he was some kind of hero standing on principle – he wasn’t. He was a lying shill who backed the narrative and lies and vaccines as much as anyone – but he seems to have had some level of discomfort with the enormity of the deceit.

I guess you could say this serves as a reminder that – however monolithic the establishment may seem – it is still made up of human pieces that might not always 100% agree about everything.

Yes, the “covid” scam had the backing of almost every establishment institution on the face of the planet, but those institutions are made up of individuals. And at least some of those individuals probably had doubts.

Probably not moral doubts   – you don’t climb the heights in intelligence or politics without being some type of psychopath – but maybe rudimentary discomfort over fear of discovery and/or failure, or an ego that doesn’t want to be seen to be the kind of person who tells lies, or one narcissistic eye on how they might be remembered by posterity.

You have to wonder how many there were who in private offered self-serving opposition to one of the greatest lies in history – and how much of a role they collectively played in the ultimate failure of the Covid narrative to go the whole distance.

Something to think on.

UN Demands ‘Global Governance’ for ‘Humanity’

UN Demands ‘Global Governance’ for ‘Humanity’
Frank Bergman
Sep 27, 2024

Unelected globalist organization the United Nations (UN) is demanding that governments of sovereign nations submit to “global governance” in order to supposedly protect “humanity” from artificial intelligence (AI).

The demand was made in a report published by the UN’s “High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence.”

The report, titled “Governing AI for Humanity,” insists that a single global government is vital to keep the emerging technology under control.

The 99-page document issues warnings about the threats from AI and details the UN’s plan for establishing global governance,

The UN also warns that individual sovereign nations have gaps in global governance as it relates to AI and issues a call to action for governments to enhance global cooperation.

It summarizes its claims as to the necessity of globalism early on.

In Chapter 2 “The Need for Global Governance” on page 37, the report expounds on its demand for globalism.

“The imperative of global governance, in particular, is irrefutable,” the report declares on page 7.

“There is, today, a global governance deficit with respect to AI.”

The document claims that AI is not understood by anyone and warns that no one is accountable for it.

“Moreover, no one currently understands all of AI’s inner workings enough to fully control its outputs or predict its evolution,” the report claims.

“Nor are decision-makers held accountable for developing, deploying, or using systems they do not understand.

“Meanwhile, negative spillovers and downstream impacts resulting from such decisions are also likely to be global.”

The document goes on to say that national governments or private companies cannot be allowed to regulate AI.

Rather, a single global government must now have control over sovereign nations.

“The development, deployment, and use of such a technology cannot be left to the whims of markets alone,” the document asserts.

“National governments and regional organizations will be crucial, but the very nature of the technology itself – transboundary in structure and application – necessitates a global approach.

“Governance can also be a key enabler for AI innovation for the SDGs globally.”

One key theme of the document is the repeated claim that AI must comply with the UN’s globalist “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDG).

This is repeated throughout the report.

Furthermore, the document calls for the establishment of global AI “governance regimes”

These “regimes” must have control over the entire planet, accoridn gto the UN.

The document declares on page 8:

“AI governance regimes must also span the globe to be effective — effective in averting ‘AI arms races’ or a ‘race to the bottom’ on safety and rights, in detecting and responding to incidents emanating from decisions along AI’s life cycle which span multiple jurisdictions, in spurring learning, in encouraging interoperability, and in sharing AI’s benefits.

“The technology is borderless and, as it spreads, the illusion that any one State or group of States could (or should) control it will diminish.”

The document argues that the global government allegedly needed to protect “humanity” from this technology must be based on the current philosophies of the United Nations.

These philosophies were summed up in another document from September called “The Pact for the Future.”

“The Pact for the Future” also pushes for global government in all areas of life, not just AI.

In addition, the taxpayer-funded United Nations proposes a “global fund for AI” which pools research from entities including global vaccine industry organizations.

“The fund’s operating model should be informed by lessons from pooled international research and development collaborations, such as CERN and [Bill Gates’s] Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, as well as lessons from commercial platforms for timeshared infrastructure,” Governing AI for Humanity said on page 67.

The report concludes by personalizing the global government agenda to the reader by using humanizing terms that evoke an emotional response.

“The High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence, convened by the United Nations Secretary-General, will undertake analysis and advance recommendations for the international governance of artificial intelligence,” the report states on page 80.

“The Body’s initial reports will provide high-level expert and independent contributions to ongoing national, regional, and multilateral debates.

“The Body will consist of 38 members from governments, private sector, civil society, and academia, as well as a member Secretary.

“Its composition will be balanced by gender, age, geographic representation, and area of expertise related to the risks and applications of artificial intelligence.

“The members of the Body will serve in their personal capacity.”

Big Tech Limited Millions of Posts During 2024 EU Elections

Newly Released Documents Reveal Big Tech Limited Millions of Posts During EU Elections
Christina Maas
Sep 28, 2024    

Ah, elections — the pinnacle of democracy where the common folk cast their ballots and, ideally, choose their fate. But hold onto your hats, because behind the grandeur of the European Parliament elections this year lurked a very different sort of governance, one executed not in the open streets but in algorithmic backrooms. Welcome to the Age of Censorship-as-a-Service, brought to you by our ever-dependable friends at Meta, Google, and TikTok.

Meta’s Mission: Make the Truth More… Manageable

Let’s begin with Meta. In a move that feels like something out of a dystopian satire, Meta proudly announced they had reduced the reach of tens of millions of posts across Europe. They wielded over 150,000 Facebook fact-checking articles to de-escalate the virality of 30 million pieces of content. According to Meta, this wasn’t censorship — no, it was a mere “scaling of the work of independent fact-checkers.” The way they tell it, this was all in the name of maintaining “informed and reliable discussions.” Ah, reliable discussions, where only pre-approved, EU-certified opinions are allowed to flow freely.

Of course, official government statements and the edicts from the holy temples of global health organizations were entirely exempt from Meta’s moderating fervor. After all, why impede the credibility of those who are never wrong — except, of course, when they are, but let’s not get hung up on inconvenient details like that.

On Instagram, another Meta product, this brave new moderation mission persisted. The platform used 39,000 fact-checking articles to put the brakes on nearly a million posts. That’s right — one million “potentially hazardous” thoughts and opinions that, for the good of humanity, needed a little algorithmic throttle. And if you were wondering, it wasn’t just the memes of conspiracy theorists — they made sure that you, your grandma, and that neighbor with too many political opinions got the message too: “Play nice, or we’ll see to it no one hears you.”

TikTok: Suppressing, But Make It Fashionable

Meta wasn’t the only digital nanny keeping Europeans in line. Over at TikTok, the playbook got even hazier. The platform took pride in admitting that it restricted misleading posts — though, unlike Meta, TikTok kept the numbers conveniently vague. You see, their strategy was more about “awareness,” guiding content creators with a gentle algorithmic shove away from the tempting edges of disinformation. How thoughtful.

As if to prove their dedication to curated reality, TikTok also pointed Irish users in the direction of fact-checks from TheJournal.ie, an outlet that coincidentally receives EU funding. No conflict of interest there, right? Just an honest effort to “raise awareness.” And while TikTok didn’t offer up the numbers, we can be assured that plenty of thumbs danced across phone screens only to find their intended messages conveniently dulled down or disappeared.

Google: Where Terms of Service Are Optional

And then we have Google, that beacon of a supposedly neutral search engine — except when it isn’t. Reports show that YouTube, under Google’s magnanimous ownership, automatically deboosted videos that complied with their very own terms of service. Yes, you read that right. Even when content passed muster by their own rulebook, some unseen hand deemed it “unworthy.” Google tells us this was to curb the spread of misinformation. A noble aim, except for that pesky issue of who gets to decide what counts as misinformation — and why.

Critics, like Tom Vandendriessche, an MEP for Patriots for Europe, have not been fooled by the big, earnest proclamations of “integrity protection.” Vandendriessche — whose party has fought and won against Big Tech’s silencing efforts — paints a stark picture of unchecked power: tech companies with unprecedented influence, deciding who gets heard and who doesn’t. “This could lead to an era of ‘techno-communism,'” Vandendriessche argued to Brussels Signal, where an unelected cabal decides what constitutes reality for the rest of us. A “techno-communism” where, if your thoughts don’t align with the given narrative, they might as well not exist.

It’s not like Vandendriessche is shouting into the void, either. His criticism comes backed by experience, his party having already tasted the bitter fruits of deplatforming. If a democratically elected official can’t even get his voice out there without tech giants intervening, what hope is there for the average citizen with an inconvenient truth?

The EU’s Seal of Approval: Trust Us, We’re Here to Help

But let’s not forget the EU brass, who are, predictably, patting Big Tech on the back. Vera?Jourová seems to believe they’ve stumbled onto some grand new way to “protect the integrity of elections.” Their stance on Big Tech’s secretive influence campaign was remarkably sunny — because nothing says “protecting democracy” like a few ultra-rich corporations quietly deciding what can or cannot be said during election season.

What’s fascinating is the conviction with which the EU spins this story. They genuinely believe — or want us to believe — that this centralized control is for our benefit, a way to combat the terrifying specter of “disinformation.” Clearly, the best way to fight misinformation is to silence millions of voices, all while exempting the officials and organizations whose statements are apparently beyond reproach. Trust us, they say: We’re only limiting the information you receive for your own good.