Shock’ Needed to Usher in ‘World Order Transformation'

World Government Summit: ‘Shock’ Needed to Usher in ‘World Order Transformation’
Frank Bergman
February 16, 2023

Globalists have been gathering at the World Government Summit in Dubai to discuss advancing plans for a single global government.

World leaders and powerful elites have been flocking to the event this week to pitch ideas for expanding globalism by uniting sovereign nations’ governments.

During a panel discussion at the summit, Professor Arturo Bris from the IMD World Competitiveness Center argued that a “shock” is needed to shift global society away from the current “world order.”

He insisted that the “transformation” of the “world order” “cannot be gradual.”

Bris told attendees that elites and world leaders need to address how to use a “shock” so the world can “go through this transformation.”

“How is this transition going to happen?” Dr. Bris asked

“I totally agree that the world order, the way it is built today, doesn’t make any sense,” he explained.

“That is not in line with the economic powers like India, Brazil, or Germany.

“They don’t have a massive role in the international order.

“But to me, the big question is how we are going to go through this transformation.

“It cannot be gradual,” he asserted.

“It has to be, has to be, driven by a part, by a certain shock that will happen.

“So now we will reconsider this entire…”

Elsewhere at the event, World Economic Forum (WEF) founder and chairman Klaus Schwab addressed attendees on his vision for a global government to “master” the human race.

As Slay News reported, Schwab has called for elites attending the World Government Summit in Dubai to come together globally in order to “master” advanced technologies.

He warned the summit’s attendees that the world could “escape our power” if they don’t act swiftly.

Schwab highlighted how “fourth industrial revolution technologies” will play a role in his “Great Reset” agenda.

He then declared: “Who masters those technologies – in some way – will be the master of the world.”

“Ten years from now we will be completely different,” Schwab said.

“My deep concern [with] fourth industrial revolution technologies, if we don’t work together on a global scale, if we do not formulate, shape together the necessary policies, they will escape our power to master those technologies.”

Meanwhile, Twitter boss Elon Musk also spoke at the World Government Summit.

However, Musk didn’t exactly tell the globalist attendees what they wanted to hear, as Slay News reported.

Musk warned that trying to form a “single world government” could cause “civilization” to “collapse.”

World Economic Forum: The New Fascism

Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum: The New Fascism
Frank Bergman
December 31, 2022

Since founding the World Economic Forum (WEF) in 1971, Klaus Schwab has grown his organization into arguably the most powerful entity in on the planet.

Yet most of the world’s population has never even heard of Schwab or the WEF, despite the group’s influence over global nations’ elected leaders.

Schwab, the WEF’s founder and sole chairman, is the original international man of mystery.

Despite Schwab openly gloating that he has world leaders in his pockets, or that he instructs presidents and prime ministers on his agenda for their countries, very little is known about him

Basic information is available — “He was born in Ravensburg, Germany in 1938 …” — but almost nothing about the man behind the facts.

In his Leftist book titled Davos Man: How Billionaires Devoured the World, New York Times journalist Peter S. Goodman offers an insider’s perspective on the doings of the rich and famous at the WEF’s annual conference at Davos, Switzerland.

Goodman has attended the event himself for the better part of a decade.

And yet, in a book that is meant to be an exposé on Schwab and his WEF, Goodman tells us little about Schwab beyond anecdotes:

    “Schwab has frequently told his colleagues that he anticipates receiving a Nobel Peace Prize…. Like the people he gathers annually in the Alps, Schwab is an exemplar of the force of pious words as prophylactic against the consequences of unsavory deeds.”

And criticisms are mostly petty in nature:

    “When a Forum employee who was late for a meeting once pulled into Schwab’s spot in the parking lot, aware that the boss was overseas, he caught wind of it, and insisted that she be fired …”

It’s not that these stories are meaningless but Goodman’s central criticism is one of elitism and hypocrisy, and these illustrate his thesis.

But as far as exposé material goes, it’s pretty thin.

When it comes to biography, Schwab is like a cardboard cutout: the outline of a man is there, but an enormous hole remains.

Even so, all of this tells us something important about Schwab: his biography appears to be carefully guarded by an army of monitors.

Consider the WEF’s “About Klaus Schwab” webpage.

It merely lists degrees, honors, books, and so on.

Wikipedia, which loves to indulge rumor and speculation of every kind, is rather mum on Schwab.

His entry is roughly 1,400 words, which is about the same word count as Screen Actors Guild president Gabrielle Carteris‘s page.

George Floyd more than doubles Schwab at 3,100 words while the fictional Mr. Bean gets 6,400.

Wikipedia is a reflection of public interest rather than public importance.

In that sense, it’s more like Yelp than Encyclopedia Britannica.

Still, for a man who regularly meets with heads of state and expects to be treated like one, this is more than a little curious.

Schwab, it seems, has managed to do what almost every drunk spring breaker has tried to do but couldn’t: scrub something negative about themselves from the Internet.

Perhaps rubbing elbows with executives in Big Tech has its advantages.

Most of what Google prioritizes in search results on the octogenarian is glowing.

Negative press about Schwab and his agenda is often swept away by his allies in Big Tech and the media and labeled “conspiracy theories.”

USA Today, Newsweek, Reuters, and many others all ran predictable “fact check” stories on some of the so-called “conspiracy theories” about Schwab.

BBC seized upon these “conspiracies” as an opportunity to publish this bizarre defense of Schwab and his “Great Reset” agenda.

In their telling of it, it’s all a rather benign attempt to create a better world.

Nothing to see here, people.

The BBC attempted to characterize all opposition to the globalist agenda as “dangerous conspiracy theories” that are linked to the MAGA crowd:

    “Believers spin dark tales about an authoritarian socialist world government run by powerful capitalists and politicians—a secret cabal that is broadcasting its plan around the world….

    “In the hands of a diverse group of online activists, the Great Reset has been transformed from a call to encourage people to think about a sustainable future, to a sinister plot against humanity.”

Either the BBC has never read Schwab, heard Schwab, or they are in on the plot against humanity.

Consider this Schwab-ism:

    “To achieve a better outcome [in the post-pandemic era], the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions.

    “Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed.

    “In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”

If your neighbor said this, you’d write him off as a whack job.

But according to The Hill, the Biden administration has expressed “devotion” to Schwab’s plan.

This is about more than putting paper and plastic in the right waste bin.

It’s nothing less than a total global overhaul.

In an academic paper that inspires the goals of the WEF, apocalyptic warnings of every type emerge, global overpopulation most of all.

The writers say it will be necessary for leaders to make “appalling” decisions in the future.

Klaus Schwab is confident he and the elitist members of his World Economic Forum are the people for that job.

UN Preparing to Expand into Single-World Govt

United Nations Preparing to Expand into Single-World Government
Frank Bergman
July 12, 2023

The globalist United Nations (UN) is preparing to massively expand its powers to overrule individual sovereign nations and position itself as an unelected single-world government.

The UN is planning to unveil proposals for the unprecedented expansion of its influence during the upcoming “Summit of the Future” conference in 2024.

Included in the proposals are policies that would grant the organization an “emergency platform” during “global crisis” events.

Such “crises” would be determined by the UN itself and “emergencies” would be declared by the agency.

Should a global “emergency” be declared by the UN, it would enable the agency to deploy “emergency powers” to meet “climate change” goals or enforce restrictions during, or even before, pandemics.

The plans also include a “digital code of ethics” that would allow the UN to censor “misinformation” to prevent a “climate” or pandemic-related “crisis.”

The UN has dubbed the spread of information that conflicts with the official “climate crisis” or pandemic narrative as an “infodemic.”

The “Summit of the Future” conference will bring together UN allied nations and non-governmental organizations, such as the World Economic Forum (WEF) and World Health Organization (WHO), to discuss a sweeping policy agenda.

The agenda speaks to left-wing initiatives such as increasing the size of government to operate on a global level, digital censorship, and drastic pandemic and climate proposals.

These policies signal a concerning expansion of the UN’s influence over individual sovereign nations, according to policy experts.

By allowing the UN to expand its powers in this way, the unelected organization will be able to overrule the laws of counties around the world to pursue its own globalist agenda.

The powers would enable the United Nations to violate Americans’ constitutional rights, for example, by stripping citizens of their free speech rights with radical censorship policies.

Michael Chamberlain, director of Protect the Public’s Trust, a government watchdog organization, warns that the proposals will see America “relinquish its sovereignty” and allow the UN, WEF, and WHO “the power to rule over us.”

“Back when Americans called themselves Englishmen, we couldn’t abide being ruled by people we didn’t vote for and never saw,” Chamberlain explains.

“Self-government is in our national DNA.

“We elect representatives to enact the laws we live by… not so with the United Nations and other international and foreign organizations.

“That is why it is exceedingly dangerous for the United States to relinquish its sovereignty and allow any of these organizations the power to rule over us.”

According to the “Strengthening the International Response to Complex Global Shocks – An Emergency Platform” policy proposal, in the event of a global crisis, such as a “major climactic event” or “future pandemic risk,” the emergency platform policy would give the U.N. the ability to “actively promote and drive an international response that places the principles of equity and solidarity at the center of its work.”

Note the wording of “future pandemic risk” rather than during an actual pandemic – the UN would be able to exercise its sweeping powers if it claims it is acting to prevent something from happening.

To prevent a “major climatic event,” the UN could block the public from buying meat and dairy products with their digital dollars to stop “global warming.”

The proposal was written by U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres.

It would grant Guterres the authority to declare an emergency platform and extend it on his own whim if the policy was ratified.

Brett Schaefer, senior researcher in International Regulatory Affairs at Heritage Foundation, is warning that Guterres and the UN will be able to overrule the leaders of once sovereign nations around the world.

“It is clearly an effort to empower the Secretary-General and the United Nations,” Schaefer warns.

“The Emergency Platform policy brief would grant the Secretary-General ‘standing authority to convene and operationalize’ a response to a broad array of international crises with minimal consultation with the member states, including the U.S.”

The emergency platform would also ensure “that participating actors make clear commitments that directly and immediately support the global response to a complex shock.”

These participating actors include the UN’s member states like the U.S., China, European Union countries, and the U.K.

“While the member states would not be compelled legally to abide by the recommendations of the Secretary-General, the pressure to ‘contribute meaningfully to the response and [be] held to account for delivery on those commitments’ would be immense,” said Schaefer.

“The U.S. should be willing to respond positively to assist other nations in times of crisis, but this should be a decision made by our elected leaders, not driven from Turtle Bay.”

Another one of the “Summit of the Future” proposals would seek to develop a “code of conduct” online that would demonetize and censor what the UN considers “misinformation.”

The sweeping censorship policy is titled “Information Integrity on Digital Platforms.”

The “code of conduct” is informed by work from groups that actively push to censor conservative speech online.

The UN and the UN-funded Global Disinformation Index (GDI) cite multiple conservative news outlets as sources of “misinformation”

However, they accrediting left-leaning sources as highly reliable, according to the GDI’s “Disinformation Risk Assessment.”

For example, the GDI gave the New York Times, the Washington Post, and BuzzFeed News “low” risk levels, while giving the Daily Wire, the New York Post, and the American Conservative “high” risk levels.

“From health and gender equality to peace, justice, education, and climate action, measures that limit the impact of mis- and disinformation and hate speech will boost efforts to achieve a sustainable future,” the UN Secretary-General wrote in the “Information Integrity on Digital Platforms” proposal.

The UN’s definition of “misinformation” poses a major risk to free speech, Schaefer said.

“We have seen firsthand how efforts to repress ‘disinformation’ and ‘misinformation’ instead are misused to silence opposing opinions and repress inconvenient evidence – such as the Chinese lab leak theory on the origin of Covid,” Schaefer said.

“It is hard to see any UN Code that would not run roughshod over the First Amendment.”

Chamberlain agreed, adding that the UN has no basis to establish the policy in any democratic country.

“Americans still have the protections of the First Amendment that prohibit the government from infringing on their rights to free speech,” said Chamberlain.

“Not only is the government barred from trampling on those rights, it is not allowed to outsource that trampling to others, not even to large, powerful international organizations, regardless of how highly regarded those organizations may be.”

Other policy proposals include a mandatory global vaccination plan for COVID-19.

The plan would seek to administer a minimum of 11 billion doses worldwide and increase funding and authority to the WHO, the health agency of the UN.

“The independence, authority, and financing of WHO must be strengthened,” wrote Guterres in the “Our Common Agenda” report.

“This includes greater financial stability and autonomy, based on fully unearmarked resources, increased funding, and an organized replenishment process for the remainder of the budget.”

Another proposal seeks to enforce “climate change” initiatives by reaching “net zero carbon emissions” by 2050 “or sooner.”

The plan involves abolishing fossil fuels and coal energy worldwide, and coercing financial actors to shift away “from high-emission sectors to the climate resilient and net zero economy.”

“We should be shoring up our populations, infrastructure, economies, and societies to be resilient to climate change, yet adaptation and resilience continue to be seriously underfunded,” Guterres said in the “Our Common Agenda” report.

However, experts warn that meeting the globalist green agenda goals seems impossible with drastic actions.

“China’s priority – and the priority of many other countries, especially developing countries – is to maximize economic growth and increase standards of living,” Schaefer said.

“To the extent that net zero and phasing out fossil fuels impede those goals, they will not abide by limitations.”

Elsewhere in the UN’s proposal are calls for mandatory globalized “digital IDs.”

As Slay News previously reported, Guterres demands in the “Our Common Agenda” report that all individuals under the UN’s control would have a digital ID that is linked to their bank account.

With the eventual rollout of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), authorities would be able to monitor and control the spending of citizens in cashless societies.

Those whose spending indicates that they pose a “risk” of contributing toward a “major climactic event” could be swiftly punished.

World Economic Forum’s emphasis on digital IDs

It aligns with the World Economic Forum’s emphasis on digital IDs in its vision for the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

The UN’s Global Digital Compact calls for banks to issue mandatory digital IDs, which could be used to refuse service to non-compliant individuals, under the guise of promoting a "human-centered digital future."

The centralisation and regulation of personal data, which would determine access to services, contradicts the UN’s claims that they are working towards an open, free, and secure digital future.

The UN’s overt push for greater global “co-operation” with digitalisation suggests a move towards a one-world government.

The potential for a centralised digital ID system linked to bank accounts and other services paves the way for a totalitarian social credit system, with all activities monitored and regulated by unaccountable officials.

globalist institutions such as United Nations (UN) and the World Economic Forum (WEF) are doing everything they can to ensure that there is global implementation of digital IDs; a move that would hasten the eventual emergence of a one-world government.

In May, the UN unveiled a new scheme to push a digital ID system on us.

In their document titled Global Digital Compact, they call for a whole host of various changes to be agreed upon and implemented to ‘regulate’ society’s digital future.

Chief among them is for it to be mandatory for banks to issue digital IDs to customers and, ostensibly, refuse service to anyone deemed non-compliant.

They say that the implementation of such policies will advance “an open, free, secure, and human-centered digital future, one that is anchored in universal human rights and that enables the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals.”

That’s just plain, utter lies, I would say… except for the ‘sustainable’ part because reducing the majority to a state in which they will own nothing is certainly ‘sustainable’ albeit in the most grotesque of ways.   

It is beyond me exactly how centralising and regulating our personal data — which would be tied to what services we can (or cannot) access is supposed to represent “an open, free, secure, and human-centered digital future”, particularly when the centralisation and regulation might be overseen by unelected bureaucrats sitting somewhere in Switzerland.

In fact, this achieves the exact opposite of open, free, secure, and human-centred.

There have been warning bells ringing for some time for those who truly want to hear.

Last year, Simon Mercieca’s Free Press reported that Iran was introducing a digital ID system that would be linked to the purchase of food:

    Iran is the first country to roll out a biometric Digital ID needed in order to buy food, eat and survive. This Digital ID is the same one that controls banks which we are being told is needed in order to roll out the central bank digital currencies. As the Financial Times has reported on 5th May:

    “What CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency, which is electronic money) research and experimentation appears to be showing is that it will be nigh on impossible to issue such currencies outside of a comprehensive national digital ID management system. Meaning: CBDCs will likely be tied to personal accounts that include personal data, credit history and other forms of relevant information.”[1]

    This is the same Digital ID that the World Economic Forum has established to be at the very crux of this Fourth Industrial Revolution.

    It is interesting to note that Iran is implementing this Digital ID through food rationing which is a bell-weather for how it is going to be rolled out around the rest of the world.

Way back in 2018, Brett Solomon, who is the head of a global non-governmental organisation that protects and defends digital rights, wrote a column on Wired in which he warned about what flows on from digital ID systems:

    … systems using artificial intelligence and machine learning are used to make decisions based on our identities. Those systems are often built on data that can reinforce bias and discrimination, and are wielded without sufficient transparency or human review. Ultimately, social credit systems, such as those that are currently being developed in China, will be based on digital ID, thereby enabling or disabling our full and free participation in society.

In the aforementioned Global Digital Compact, the UN doesn’t shy away from being overt about its scheme towards a one-world government, stating that “unilateral regional, national or industry actions are insufficient: this cooperation (towards digitalisation) must be global and multi-stakeholder.”

The question is, why exactly are sovereign, democratic and free enterprise systems “inefficient” (according to the UN) and in what what?

If you look at their document, you will find it is riddled with ambiguous and vague terms, never giving a clear-cut answer to how exactly the UN’s recommendations will actually help society.

Rather than relying on statistics, solid research work, and empirical evidence in support of their arguments, it all seems to be nonsensical corporate speak about how “inclusion,” “sustainability” and “universal human rights” will be enforced through “multi-stakeholder action” and “smart techniques” regarding “next-generation digital networks” as we navigate this “triple planetary crisis.”

And if you can understand all of that then you’re doing better than I!

One common theme throughout their document is how they repeatedly emphasise greater international regulation of new technologies to “help safeguard peace and security online.”

The words freedom and regulation don’t mix together well, especially when it’s regulation that has its basis in safeguarding “peace and security”.

Just recall the massive expansion of the surveillance state and the pandemic-era lockdowns that were also done in the name of safeguarding “peace and security”.

Imagine if their plan is fully realised, especially the linking of a centralised digital ID system with our bank accounts and other services.

Effectively, it would pave the way for an even more totalitarian form of social credit system; one from which there will be no escape.

All your activities will be monitored and regulated by unaccountable officials.

Should you transgress their policies and protest for your freedom and that of your countrymen, you would find yourself effectively stripped of all your rights, including that of your person.

In the face of such concerning developments, it is essential for individuals around the world to remain vigilant and informed.

The potential for misuse of a global digital identity system is enormous, with serious implications for privacy and personal freedom.

It’s crucial to question the narratives presented by powerful organisations like the UN, the WEF, the corporate media, and even our own governments, and to demand transparency in their actions.

Each and every one of us has a role to play in shaping the future of our digital world.

Let’s stand up for our rights, challenge the unchecked power of institutions, and actively participate in creating a truly open, free, and secure digital future.

Such a future does not include any mandatory digital identity system, central bank digital currency, or social credit system.

And it certainly doesn’t include a one-world government.

Until next time, God bless you, your family and nation.

Take care,

George Christensen, with a Nation First staff writer

UN & WEF admit they CENSOR Search Results & pay Big Tech

“We own the Science and We think the World should know it” – UN & WEF admit they CENSOR Search Results & pay Big Tech & Influencers to shape Public Opinion on Climate Change & COVID-19
By The Exposé on July 25, 2023

The World Economic Forum held the Sustainable Development Impact Meetings towards the end of September 2022, convening at the same time as the United Nations General Assembly.

In those meetings, UN officials declared that they apparently “own the science”.

They also admitted to; among other things –

•     Partnering with Google to censor search results that don’t fit the official narrative and ensure their propaganda is top of the list in relation to things such as ‘Covid-19’ and ‘Climate Change’ in order to shape public opinion.
•     Partnering with Big Tech Social Media companies to boost propaganda messaging on things such as Covid-19 and Climate Change in order to shape public opinion.
•     Giving millions to social media influencers to spout their propaganda for them in order to shape public opinion.

    “We own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do,”

    “If you Google ‘climate change,’ you will, at the top of your search, you will get all kinds of UN resources.”

    “Another really key strategy we had was to deploy influencers… influencers who were really keen, who have huge followings, but really keen to help carry messages that were going to serve their communities, and they were much more trusted than the United Nations”

    “This idea that all speech is equal is not true”

Welcome to The Great Reset...

During the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Sustainable Development Impact Meetings in September 2022, the unelected globalists held a panel on “Tackling Disinformation” where participants from the UN, CNN, and Brown University discussed how to best control narratives.

Melissa Fleming, Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications at the United Nations, highlighted that the UN had partnered with several big tech companies, including TikTok and Google, to control COVID and climate narratives while claiming, “We own the science.”

On the topic of controlling the climate change narrative, Fleming remarked that the UN had partnered with Google so that the unelected globalists’ authoritative narratives would appear at the top of search results.

“We partnered with Google,” said Fleming, adding, “for example, if you Google ‘climate change,’ you will, at the top of your search, you will get all kinds of UN resources.

“We started this partnership when we were shocked to see that when we Googled ‘climate change,’ we were getting incredibly distorted information right at the top.

“We’re becoming much more proactive. We own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do,” she added.

But the unelected globalists’ efforts on narrative control didn’t end with partnering with Google to manipulate search results on climate change.

Fleming also highlighted that the UN worked with TikTok on a project called “Team Halo” to boost COVID messaging coming from medical and scientific communities on the Chinese-owned video-sharing platform.

“We had another trusted messenger project, which was called ‘Team Halo’ where we trained scientists around the world and some doctors on TikTok, and we had TikTok working with us,” she said.

The UN claims to own the science, but if we take a closer look at who funds the UN’s “directing and coordinating authority on international health” — the World Health Organization (WHO) — we get a clearer picture of who is really calling the shots.

Historically, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, along with the Gates-backed GAVI vaccine alliance, have contributed more to the WHO program budget than all member nations, save two — the US and the UK.

Who owns the science again?

During the recent WEF panel, the UN global communications rep went on to admit that people didn’t trust institutions like the UN when it came to information related to COVID, and so to counter this, the UN looked to influencers to get its message across through the backdoor.

“Another really key strategy we had was to deploy influencers,” she said, adding, “influencers who were really keen, who have huge followings, but really keen to help carry messages that were going to serve their communities, and they were much more trusted than the United Nations telling them something from New York City headquarters.”

The idea of infiltrating and subverting online groups from within by targeting influencers mirrors recommendations coming out of a Google-backed RAND report published in April 2021.

According to the report’s policy recommendations:

“Conspiracists have their own experts on whom they lean to support and strengthen their views, and their reliance on these experts might limit the impact of formal outreach by public health professionals.

“Our review of the literature shows that one alternative approach could be to direct outreach toward moderate members of those groups who could, in turn, exert influence on the broader community.”

The report went on to say, “Commercial marketing programs use a similar approach when they engage social media influencers (or brand ambassadors), who can then credibly communicate advantages of a commercial brand to their own audiences on social media.”

Moderating the “Tackling Disinformation” panel was WEF managing director Adrian Monck, who in recent months has been name-calling critics of the WEF and components of its great reset agenda as white supremacists and anti-Semites engaged in far-right disinformation campaigns.

When addressing CNN’s Rachel Smolkin, Monck said that CNN was part of a political war strategy to “own the narrative.”

“CNN is both an organization that’s trying to make sense of the world and trying to establish the facts; it’s also part of a political war on who owns the narrative,” he said.

According to MintPress News, CNN received $3.6 million in donations from none other than the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation — the same organization that’s been heavily invested in the WHO.

The investigation revealed that Gates had also donated a whopping $319 million to many of the biggest and most influential corporate news outlets in the world.

Who’s really engaged in the “political war on who owns the narrative” again?

Speaking of owning narratives, last year, the WEF launched the great narrative initiative as a sequel to the great reset, with the goal of reshaping all aspects of society and the global economy.

The idea of a great narrative is something that the French philosopher Jean-Francois Lyotard called a “grand narrative,” (aka “metanarrative“) which, according to Philo-Notes, “functions to legitimize power, authority, and social customs” — everything that the great reset is trying to achieve.

Once the great reset has its great narrative implemented, any opposing narrative can be dismissed as disinformation, conspiracy, or extremism that must be censored and suppressed for the greater, collective good.

In one single WEF panel on “Tackling Disinformation,” we saw unelected globalists claim that they basically had a monopoly on science and that corporate media was embroiled in a battle to own the narrative.

At the same time, the UN rep claimed that people who questioned the vaccine narrative were “seizing the opportunity of people being afraid” to inject disinformation.

According to Fleming, “People who are very active in the anti-vaccine scene and others were seizing the opportunity of people being so afraid — injecting disinformation and misleading information — fueled also by some leaders and governments.”

However, it was the UK’s King Charles III, (Prince of Wales at the time of The Great Reset launch), who said in June 2020, “We have a golden opportunity to seize something good from this crisis — its unprecedented shockwaves may well make people more receptive to big visions of change.”

Similarly, WEF founder Klaus Schwab said that the pandemic represented “a rare but narrow window of opportunity” to initiate the great reset agenda.

If anyone was “seizing the opportunity” to exploit people’s fears during the pandemic, unelected globalists and the British crown would certainly be at the top of that list.

On the subject of free speech, Brown University’s Claire Wardle, who is self-styled as “one of the world’s leading experts on misinformation,” told the WEF disinformation panel that she was frustrated that people couldn’t have a “more nuanced conversation about speech” as she simultaneously engaged in a nuanced conversation about free speech.

Free speech is free speech. It allows for nuanced conversation by default.

However, that didn’t stop Wardle from complaining about free speech even as she was actively participating in it in real time.

“I just wish we could have a more nuanced conversation about speech,” she said.

“This idea that all speech is equal is not true, and I wish we could just have that conversation properly,” Wardle added, as she had exactly that type of conversation.

By declaring they “own the science,” partnering with big tech companies to manipulate search results to influence public opinion, and pouring millions of dollars into media outlets, the unelected globalists are once again showing their true colours for all to see.

Owning the science leads to owning the narrative.

Owning the narrative means controlling thought and speech.

Controlling thought and speech means the end of free society.

Welcome to The Great Reset.

The unelected globalists’ authoritarian attempts to remake society out of the destruction of the old are becoming increasingly more obvious and desperate as the people’s trust in the global elites continues to crumble.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnarHXcGN8M

Absurd Lies About Russia Since SMO Started

Top 5 Completely Absurd Lies About Russia Since SMO Started
Drago Bosnic

Siuth Front, 08.06.2023

Russophobia and anti-Russian propaganda run very deep, particularly in the political West. For centuries, various European invaders have been portraying Russia in the worst possible light. Over time, this became extremely intricate and even found its way into the mainstream. However, more recently, particularly since the start of the special military operation (SMO) in Ukraine, Russophobic propaganda became completely absurd. Choosing the top 5 of these certainly wasn’t an easy task, as the amount of ludicrous claims is absolutely mind-boggling. From the “Ghost of Kiev” and “the last stand of the Snake Island defenders” to pickle jar air defenses and the “Goat of Kiev”, you get a pretty good idea of just how laborious such a task could’ve been. However, in terms of being completely devoid of any logic, here are the top 5, in chronological order.

Russia destroys its own Nord Stream pipelines

According to the “free press”, on September 26, 2022, Moscow was extremely bored with all the windfall coming from rising natural gas prices, so it decided to blow up its Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines after spending the previous 17 years building them. Interestingly, Russia decided to do this only a day after Poland and Norway opened the Nord Stream’s primary competitor, the Baltic Pipe, running through Denmark and bringing in gas from the North Sea. Obviously, in order to make the task more difficult, but also more fun, Russia decided to conduct the attack within the exclusive economic zones (EEZ) of Denmark and Sweden, instead of its own.

For months, various “conspiracy theorists” kept claiming that Russia didn’t actually destroy its own pipelines. However, the “free press” had “conclusive evidence” that the “cartoonishly evil Kremlin”, previously accused of “weaponizing” its vast energy reserves against the European Union, decided to destroy it and help the US profit immensely from the EU’s weaning off Russian natural gas. US President Joe Biden openly threatening to destroy Nord Stream, as well as Victoria Nuland’s snarky boastfulness about the pipelines becoming “a hunk of metal at the bottom of the sea” mean absolutely nothing and are just Russian propaganda.

The destruction of its own pipelines came approximately a month after some in the EU suggested using the Nord Stream 2 pipeline to increase Russian energy imports and also “coincided perfectly” with the manifold surge in US LNG shipments to the EU, which surpassed Russian natural gas deliveries for the very first time. This resulted in even the usually compliant Brussels bureaucrats complaining that the US is engaged in war profiteering.

Russia blows up the Crimean Bridge

On October 8, the “evil dictator Putin” was sick and tired of seeing the Crimean Bridge whole, so he decided to blow it up. Unfortunately, the men he entrusted this task with failed and managed to “only” partially damage the bridge which is crucial for Russian logistics. Once again, in order to make it more fun, Putin ordered the saboteurs to try and reach Crimea through Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey and Georgia, then go through southern Russia and reach the bridge from the east. Repeated snarky remarks by Zelensky’s adviser Mykhailo Podolyak who boasted about the attack, as well as similar statements from the Kiev regime’s Defense Ministry and even Zelensky himself were just another piece of Russian propaganda and they could never in any way implicate anyone else.

Russia wants to irradiate itself by attacking the Zaporozhye NPP

After Russian forces took over the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant (NPP), “evil Putin” realized that his troops there didn’t have much to do, so he decided to order the nearby Russian artillery unit to start shelling their own comrades in the NPP. Apparently, this was the only way to extract the sensitive US nuclear technologies from there, as Russia lacks such advanced high-tech due to its extremely underdeveloped nuclear energy industry. According to undeniably truthful reporting by the “free press”, Russian shelling is ongoing as President Putin wants to make sure his forces there also get irradiated in case of a catastrophic detonation of one or all reactors. The only reason this hasn’t happened yet is the chronic lack of shells and the poor precision of the Russian artillerymen.

Russia regularly attacks itself with drones

The escalating drone attacks across western parts of Russia, including the capital city of Moscow, clearly cannot be the fault of its neighbor to the southwest. Which begs the question of where do these mysterious unmanned flying machines come from? Once again, the only logical conclusion could be President Putin’s unrelenting boredom. Because Moscow is too safe, this significantly amplifies the monotony, resulting in the Russian president’s orders for repeated attacks on the capital city. This is also a good way to make sure Russian air defense units in and around Moscow have something to do. However, Putin might have gone a bit too far recently, as he ordered a drone strike on the Kremlin and possibly on himself. The “free press” reports that this might have something to do with his rapidly deteriorating physical and mental health, as clearly indicated by the way Putin sits and places his hands.

Russia blows up its own dam in order to flood itself

On the morning of June 6, Russia realized it has had enough of the Kakhovka dam being too whole, so it decided to blow it up. The “evil Kremlin” went ahead with this plan after realizing it would result in catastrophic flooding of the areas under its control and also endanger hundreds of defensive positions of the Russian military. In addition, the water supply for Crimea is now at risk, once again clearly implying that Putin had every reason to order the destruction of the dam, as Crimeans were obviously too bored with all the water they’ve been getting since the Northern Crimean Canal was reactivated. Another important piece of evidence pointing to Moscow is that this also endangers the Zaporozhye NPP, which Russia clearly wants to destroy in order to irradiate itself (see point four).

However, although several Kiev regime’s top officials, such as Major General Andriy Kovalchuk, stated they’ve been planning to attack Kakhovka and even conducted “test strikes”, this is obviously just Russian propaganda by rabidly pro-Kremlin outlets such as the Washington Post. Interestingly, some Western analysts and experts, particularly those from the “free press” such as CNN and NBC have suggested this might have something to do with Russia finally acknowledging that the Normandy landings were much more important than the Eastern Front during the Second World War, as the event “coincided” with the 79th anniversary of the D-Day.

Ukraine is ground zero for the CIA’s fascist origins

Ukraine is ground zero for the CIA’s fascist origins

strategic-culture.org

July 7, 2023

The American magazine Newsweek published a big “exclusive” report this week purporting to reveal the extent of CIA involvement in the Ukraine proxy war against Russia. It hardly merits the billing of “exclusive” since it is well known that the U.S. spy agency is up to its neck in orchestrating the conflict.

In truth, the CIA’s nefarious role in Ukraine goes back decades to the end of World War Two. More on that further down.

Nevertheless, the Newsweek article provides a useful admission that Washington is recklessly – and criminally – fueling hostilities towards Russia, the world’s biggest nuclear power in terms of its arsenal. The Biden administration and its military-intelligence apparatus are risking an escalation of the proxy war to an all-out nuclear conflagration.

The Newsweek report remarks on the “contradiction” between President Joe Biden’s public vow to not put American boots on the ground and the undeniable heavy presence of U.S. clandestine forces in Ukraine helping (more precisely, directing) the war effort. Instead of “contradiction”, a plainer, more fitting word is “lie”.

Recall, too, Biden previously said he doesn’t want to “start World War Three” with Russia. That’s about as believable as an alcoholic saying he doesn’t want another drink.

The Biden administration is engaged in gross deception of the American public by absurdly pretending that U.S. military personnel are not in Ukraine and that Washington is not directing a war against Russia. Biden’s policy of pumping weapons into Ukraine ($40 billion so far) is inexorably leading the United States and its NATO allies deeper into an all-out war against Russia. Yet this mentally challenged president somehow maintains “there are no U.S. boots on the ground” and that the U.S.-led NATO alliance is not at war with Russia. Such blatant lies should be grounds for his impeachment.

Apart from the admission that the Newsweek article provides, the otherwise banal reporting is a whitewash of the CIA’s pivotal and pernicious role in the Ukraine conflict.

Laughably, the article portrays the CIA as “trying to ensure the war does not spin out of control”. Thus, the agency is presented as a moderating, restraining influence on the Kiev regime and its military conduct. The reader is led to believe that Washington is endeavoring to prevent the Ukrainian military from launching direct attacks on Russia. It is claimed that the CIA is “struggling” to control the operations of the Kiev regime which has at times gone rogue against Biden’s “rules of engagement”. Examples of rogue conduct, it is claimed, are the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage, the bombing of the Kerch Bridge to Crimea, drone attacks on Moscow and several “mysterious assassinations” of Russian public figures.

This is risible disinformation from the CIA courtesy of Newsweek. Alternative, reliable investigative reporting by Seymour Hersh and others has exposed the Biden administration’s direct responsibility for the blowing up of the Nord Stream gas pipeline under the Baltic Sea last September.

It is also credibly asserted by Moscow that none of the other deep attacks on Russia could have been carried out by Ukrainian forces without the logistical involvement of the CIA and other NATO covert military agencies, primarily Britain’s MI6.

Since the conflict erupted in February last year, the Biden administration and its NATO partners have stoked the war with stepwise increases in ever-more lethal weaponry, from long-range missiles to battlefield tanks to promised delivery of F-16 fighter jets. This week Biden has reportedly green-lighted the supply of banned cluster munitions, which the Kiev regime will doubtless use against civilians in Russia’s Donbass region – under instruction from CIA advisors.

A crucial historical background for understanding the conflict in Ukraine is the involvement of the CIA in orchestrating the coup d’état in Kiev in 2014. That coup ousted a democratically elected president, Viktor Yanukovich, and ushered in the Neo-Nazi junta that persists today – headed by the nominally Jewish comedian figure Vladimir Zelensky.

Zelensky and his inveterate corrupt cabal are nothing more than puppets and playthings for the CIA and MI6. Their useful-idiot function is to front a colossal arms racket and a U.S.-led proxy war to undermine Russia geopolitically, with regime change in Moscow as the ultimate objective, as well as to facilitate Washington’s agenda of subjugating Europe as a vassal colony for American capital for the purpose of propelling the next American war against China.

The CIA and its British counterparts are running the Neo-Nazi cesspit that Ukraine has been turned into. Even while trying to whitewash the CIA’s criminal role in Ukraine, the Newsweek article cited above admits that the agency has multiple bases located across that pathetic country and that CIA operatives are overseeing “massive networks” of arms running.

But what is particularly disturbing about the disinformation is the attempt to hoodwink the American public and others into thinking that the CIA and the Biden administration are somehow bystanders to the war. A war that is escalating despite their supposed noble efforts at “restraining”.

The American public is being drugged with lies and blandishments, misled as if sleepwalking towards a catastrophic world war with nuclear-armed Russia.

The conflict in Ukraine could be stopped immediately, as Russian national security advisor and former president Dmitry Medvedev pointed out again this week, if the United States simply stopped supplying weapons to Ukraine. However, the Biden administration has spurned all diplomatic efforts to negotiate a political-security settlement. U.S. media reports this week of “back channel” communications with Russia are not credible when Washington is giving full throttle to the war effort with the sinister hand of the CIA.

It should be remembered, too, that the CIA was borne out of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) at the end of World War Two. One of its first postwar tasks was recruiting Ukrainian fascists and mass killers who had collaborated with the Nazi Reich in its genocidal Final Solution against Slavs, Jews, Poles and others. (These fascists like Stepan Bandera and Mykola Lebed are held up as national heroes by today’s Kiev regime, including Jewish Mr Zelensky.) Washington deliberately recruited and deployed those terrorists to attack the Soviet Union in order to advance U.S. imperialist hegemonic ambitions in Europe.

Not much has changed. Ukraine is ground zero for the CIA’s fascist origins. Not only are American boots on the ground in Ukraine in large numbers. They have been there for decades – paired with jackboots – for the very objective of fomenting the present dangerous crisis that has now culminated.

Newsweek and other U.S. mainstream media are a profanity to public service and truth. One can discern between the lines, if sufficiently aware, but generally, those media outlets are tantamount to acting like soporific drugs. They should be obliged to carry a doctor’s warning on their frontage banners: consuming this product can induce stupidity resulting in disaster.