World Economic Forum’s emphasis on digital IDs

It aligns with the World Economic Forum’s emphasis on digital IDs in its vision for the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

The UN’s Global Digital Compact calls for banks to issue mandatory digital IDs, which could be used to refuse service to non-compliant individuals, under the guise of promoting a "human-centered digital future."

The centralisation and regulation of personal data, which would determine access to services, contradicts the UN’s claims that they are working towards an open, free, and secure digital future.

The UN’s overt push for greater global “co-operation” with digitalisation suggests a move towards a one-world government.

The potential for a centralised digital ID system linked to bank accounts and other services paves the way for a totalitarian social credit system, with all activities monitored and regulated by unaccountable officials.

globalist institutions such as United Nations (UN) and the World Economic Forum (WEF) are doing everything they can to ensure that there is global implementation of digital IDs; a move that would hasten the eventual emergence of a one-world government.

In May, the UN unveiled a new scheme to push a digital ID system on us.

In their document titled Global Digital Compact, they call for a whole host of various changes to be agreed upon and implemented to ‘regulate’ society’s digital future.

Chief among them is for it to be mandatory for banks to issue digital IDs to customers and, ostensibly, refuse service to anyone deemed non-compliant.

They say that the implementation of such policies will advance “an open, free, secure, and human-centered digital future, one that is anchored in universal human rights and that enables the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals.”

That’s just plain, utter lies, I would say… except for the ‘sustainable’ part because reducing the majority to a state in which they will own nothing is certainly ‘sustainable’ albeit in the most grotesque of ways.   

It is beyond me exactly how centralising and regulating our personal data — which would be tied to what services we can (or cannot) access is supposed to represent “an open, free, secure, and human-centered digital future”, particularly when the centralisation and regulation might be overseen by unelected bureaucrats sitting somewhere in Switzerland.

In fact, this achieves the exact opposite of open, free, secure, and human-centred.

There have been warning bells ringing for some time for those who truly want to hear.

Last year, Simon Mercieca’s Free Press reported that Iran was introducing a digital ID system that would be linked to the purchase of food:

    Iran is the first country to roll out a biometric Digital ID needed in order to buy food, eat and survive. This Digital ID is the same one that controls banks which we are being told is needed in order to roll out the central bank digital currencies. As the Financial Times has reported on 5th May:

    “What CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency, which is electronic money) research and experimentation appears to be showing is that it will be nigh on impossible to issue such currencies outside of a comprehensive national digital ID management system. Meaning: CBDCs will likely be tied to personal accounts that include personal data, credit history and other forms of relevant information.”[1]

    This is the same Digital ID that the World Economic Forum has established to be at the very crux of this Fourth Industrial Revolution.

    It is interesting to note that Iran is implementing this Digital ID through food rationing which is a bell-weather for how it is going to be rolled out around the rest of the world.

Way back in 2018, Brett Solomon, who is the head of a global non-governmental organisation that protects and defends digital rights, wrote a column on Wired in which he warned about what flows on from digital ID systems:

    … systems using artificial intelligence and machine learning are used to make decisions based on our identities. Those systems are often built on data that can reinforce bias and discrimination, and are wielded without sufficient transparency or human review. Ultimately, social credit systems, such as those that are currently being developed in China, will be based on digital ID, thereby enabling or disabling our full and free participation in society.

In the aforementioned Global Digital Compact, the UN doesn’t shy away from being overt about its scheme towards a one-world government, stating that “unilateral regional, national or industry actions are insufficient: this cooperation (towards digitalisation) must be global and multi-stakeholder.”

The question is, why exactly are sovereign, democratic and free enterprise systems “inefficient” (according to the UN) and in what what?

If you look at their document, you will find it is riddled with ambiguous and vague terms, never giving a clear-cut answer to how exactly the UN’s recommendations will actually help society.

Rather than relying on statistics, solid research work, and empirical evidence in support of their arguments, it all seems to be nonsensical corporate speak about how “inclusion,” “sustainability” and “universal human rights” will be enforced through “multi-stakeholder action” and “smart techniques” regarding “next-generation digital networks” as we navigate this “triple planetary crisis.”

And if you can understand all of that then you’re doing better than I!

One common theme throughout their document is how they repeatedly emphasise greater international regulation of new technologies to “help safeguard peace and security online.”

The words freedom and regulation don’t mix together well, especially when it’s regulation that has its basis in safeguarding “peace and security”.

Just recall the massive expansion of the surveillance state and the pandemic-era lockdowns that were also done in the name of safeguarding “peace and security”.

Imagine if their plan is fully realised, especially the linking of a centralised digital ID system with our bank accounts and other services.

Effectively, it would pave the way for an even more totalitarian form of social credit system; one from which there will be no escape.

All your activities will be monitored and regulated by unaccountable officials.

Should you transgress their policies and protest for your freedom and that of your countrymen, you would find yourself effectively stripped of all your rights, including that of your person.

In the face of such concerning developments, it is essential for individuals around the world to remain vigilant and informed.

The potential for misuse of a global digital identity system is enormous, with serious implications for privacy and personal freedom.

It’s crucial to question the narratives presented by powerful organisations like the UN, the WEF, the corporate media, and even our own governments, and to demand transparency in their actions.

Each and every one of us has a role to play in shaping the future of our digital world.

Let’s stand up for our rights, challenge the unchecked power of institutions, and actively participate in creating a truly open, free, and secure digital future.

Such a future does not include any mandatory digital identity system, central bank digital currency, or social credit system.

And it certainly doesn’t include a one-world government.

Until next time, God bless you, your family and nation.

Take care,

George Christensen, with a Nation First staff writer