FDA is a front organisation: There are no technicians in the buildings, no equipment and no sample testing occurs
By Rhoda Wilson on June 12, 2024
Katherine Watt has been corresponding with a reader who is researching the history of US public health and regulatory agencies. Records before 1973 are difficult to locate. However, what has become clear is that the origins of these agencies are not what they make them out to be.
Why are they lying about their origins? Because, Watt says, “they have maintained a bunch of empty office buildings that serve only as mailing addresses … There are no technicians in the buildings, there’s no equipment and no sample testing occurs.”
Katherine Watt is a mom, Catholic, and paralegal from Pennsylvania, USA. On her Substack page ‘Bailiwick News’ she documents how, since at least World War II, US Congress has been waging war on the people by passing legislation which makes it easier and easier for them to be destroyed – legally – by the pharmaceutical industry.
One of Watt’s Substack readers is researching the pre-1972 statutory and regulatory history of some of the USA’s public health agencies, including the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) and the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”).
The reason why 1972 is relevant is that in that year the regulation of biological products transferred from the NIH Division of Biologics Standards to the FDA Bureau of Biologics. “In 1973, FDA published a consolidated set of biological product manufacturing non-regulations in the Federal Register,” Watt explained.
“Administrative rule-making by FDA since 1973 is relatively easy to locate,” she said. However, “administrative rule-making by NIH prior to 1973 is more difficult to locate.”
Commenting on Watt’s article below, Dr. Mike Yeadon said:
It looks like deception may have been going on a very long time before “covid vaccines” were a thing.
If Katherine Watt is right, there are entire administrative processes that exist only on paper, but there are no staff overseeing the technical aspects implied. Effectively, no practical regulation of vaccines (safety, efficacy and quality) has ever existed.
Nothing would surprise me anymore. After all, as I have said repeatedly, there are in the “covid-19 vaccines” numerous, independent, unnecessary and (to those with relevant expertise) obvious toxicity risks, none of which have been evaluated (because they’re intentional, they’re there by design).
Dr. Mike Yeadon on Telegram, 11 June 2024
Below we have republished excerpts from Watt’s article that are relevant to Dr. Yeadon’s comment above. Watt’s article briefly describes the research her reader has undertaken and Watt’s response to one of her reader’s questions.
On FDA Buildings as Virtual Mailboxes to Project the Public Illusion of Biological Product Manufacturing Regulation
By Katherine Watt
One of the questions the reader is trying to answer has to do with whether biological regulation authority was ever statutorily established by [the US] Congress, for NIH and its precursor organisations, going back to the late 1800s.
Modern-day NIH and FDA officials present historical accounts of how the biological product and vaccine manufacturing regulatory systems began and developed.
But from her research so far, the reader has concluded that their origin-story claims are not supported by the text of the statutes they cite.
During an email exchange recently, she raised the question “Why are they lying” about their statutory and/or administrative origins?
I sent her a reply with my hypothesis about why NIH and FDA lie about their origins and evolution.
Watt’s Reply
The “why they are lying” question is one that I’ve been mulling for a few months.
My hypothesis is that they have maintained a bunch of empty office buildings that serve only as mailing addresses (virtual mailboxes), without having any actual technical staff, laboratory equipment, or application and sample processing procedures.
They do that so that they can have fake forms for vaccine manufacturers to fill out. These included both the establishment license application, ELA, and product license application, PLA, from 1973 to the mid-1990s.
The ELA + PLA application process became, in the mid-1990s, the biologics license application, or BLA, by eliminating even the ostensible/fake requirement for establishment inspections and licensing, and by breaking up the “responsible head” at the factories, into multiple responsible people, so that no one would be responsible.
The factory employees, who are also just a handful of paper pushers with no scientific knowledge or responsibility, in a building whose equipment just makes immunotoxic junk and puts it in vials and slaps labels on it, filled out the application forms and mailed them to the FDA addresses (Bureau of Biologics in 1973, all its NIH predecessors and FDA successors, Centre for Biologics Evaluation and Research – CBER now).
The application forms arrived at that address where another one or two paper pushers put them in a filing cabinet and then shredded them a few years later.
Since the advent of electronic filing systems, the application and licensing forms have been filed, transferred and stored electronically, and deleted at regular intervals.
There are no technicians in the buildings, there’s no equipment and no sample testing occurs.
It’s all a front: statutes, regulations, procedures, application forms, buildings, addresses, offices, labs, approved applications and licenses sent by the FDA back to the factories, everything.
A handful of people at pharma companies know it.
A handful of people at the FDA know it.
And everyone else just assumes that a different, specialised department with specialised staff, equipment and procedures is handling it somewhere in the factory, and somewhere within the FDA.
You can read Watt’s full article HERE which is the ninth in a series of articles on “FDA non-regulation of non-medicines, including vaccines, more accurately understood as intentionally immunotoxic poisons.”
Comments:
UK’s MHRA chief till recently was June Raine who makes no secret of the fact that MHRA is an enabler for Big Pharma, not a Regulator!!!!!! In other words it has left its role of gamekeeper and gone over to the side of the poachers !
Debi Evans of UK Column has been keeping a close eye on Madame Rain’s activities, attending MhRA’s and generally putting the heat under her. I strongly recommend you looking at Debi Evans’ stuff, it’s excellent. June Raine has doubtless gone off to enjoy her reward for her betrayal of the Britis public’s health.
This should tell everyone all they need to know about food and drug approval and regulation. It is a scam. That tells me that all safety claims should be called into question.
FDA is a cog in the pay-to-play supply of products and all part of the corporate monopoly. It has no liability for pushing unsafe and dangerous products so it is a front organisation to pretend to people that some product is safe.
I am British, I am a tea drinker, have been all my life. Upon arriving in the US I start making my cups of tea. Over an extended period of time the cups of tea started to make me feel ill. So I started to experiment, bottled water instead of osmosis filtered, inspected the sugar how can you change sugar a chemical maybe? US tea is garbage I only drink PG Tips or some other brand I know. Only ever use 2% milk that is all.
The extended life milk supermarkets are pushing … I switched that out and used 2% organic only milk and all the issues went away. Contacted the FDA, they just FOB you off that all milk is the same … then why was I able to solve the problem if everything is the same. At that point I knew the FDA lie and if they lie about milk they probably lie about everything else.
Want another FDA scam? Importing electronics parts into the USA came in through DHL. I got a massive import tax ….
But in the breakdown of the import tax total was a $40 fee for the FDA.
F@cking priceless I do not eat or consume electronics but they get a cut.
Does not surprise me at all.
ONE other thing I think about, besides others, is that the treasonous FDA calls many substances GRAS=generally recognized as safe. Therefore, GRAS substances can be added to food products without their testing them, and the FDA allows manufacturers to police their own ingredents as okay. I actually want to know what is in my food. I want to know if there is extra water, or salt, vinegar, etcetera added..
Here is a blurb from the FDA website. Notice that if it was approved before 1958, when things were much more basic and unknown, when our testing and technology was much less sophisticated, when fewer food additives and chemicals were used, its’ overwhelmingly believed to be okay!.
Do I trust the FDA (or other government agencies? Nope….The FDA had a direct hand in approving/accepting GMO’s, glyphosate, and more nasties.
The Substances Added to Food inventory includes the following types of ingredients regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA):
Food additives and color additives that are listed in FDA regulations (21 CFR Parts 172, 173 and Parts 73, 74 respectively), and flavoring substances evaluated by FEMA* and JECFA*.
Generally Recognized as Safe (“GRAS”) substances that are listed in FDA regulations (21 CFR Parts 182 and 184).
Substances approved for specific uses in foods prior to September 6, 1958, known as prior-sanctioned substances (21 CFR Part 181)
Articles:
https://www.consumerreports.org/food-safety/gras-hidden-ingredients-in-your-food/
https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/2022/04/ewg-analysis-almost-all-new-food-chemicals-greenlighted-industry-not-fda
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fda-loophole-allows-possi_b_9182800
No comments:
Post a Comment