Wednesday, July 31, 2019

5 of the World's Most Remote Places


For the brave hearts...
The writer probably forgot about Point Nemo in the Southern Pacific!




5 of the World's Most Remote Places (and What It Takes to Get There)

As the world's infrastructure and technology continue to advance, it's becoming easier and easier to take off and travel the globe. Even so, there are still some places left on Earth that are far from easy to get to. These are five of the world's most remote towns, islands, and inhabited lands, and what it takes to get there — if you dare attempt it.

Oymyakon, Russia

Tucked away in a remote corner of Siberia, this Russian town is known as one of the coldest inhabited places on earth. Winter temperatures average an unbelievable minus 58 degrees Fahrenheit: cold enough to give you frostbite within minutes. It's also impossible to grow crops in these temperatures, so people survive on reindeer meat, frozen fish, and horse-blood ice cubes with macaroni.

As if the cold wasn't challenging enough, it takes several days just to get in or out of the region. You can catch a flight from Moscow to the towns of Yakutsk or Magadan, but those are still 560 miles (900 kilometers) away from Oymyakon via the Road of Bones. Visit at your own risk!

Supai, Arizona, USA


The remote village of the Havasupai Indian Tribe is located in the westernmost part of the Grand Canyon and it's open to visitors who reserve a campsite. Sounds easy enough, right? Not at all. To get there, it's a four-hour drive from Grand Canyon Village to Havasupai Hilltop. Once there, you'd better lace up your hiking boots, because it's quite the trek down to camp — the National Park Service recommends giving yourself three days to get there. If you're looking to make more of an entrance, horseback or helicopter are also options.

Kerguelen Islands, French Southern and Antarctic Lands


Appropriately nicknamed "Desolate Islands," this group of islands in the Indian Ocean is only accessible by boat four days a year. Talk about remote! Part of the French and Southern Antarctic Lands, the Kerguelen Islands are 2,000 miles from civilization (on the southernmost part of Africa) and covered in inhospitable mountains and glaciers. The 45 to 100 researchers that inhabit the islands year-round must endure 300 days of rain, sleet, or snow and winds so strong that its flying insects have evolved to be wingless so that they don't blow out to sea.

Socotra Island, Yemen


An archipelago 211 miles off the coast of Yemen in the Indian Ocean, Socotra is so isolated that one-third of its plant and animal species aren't found anywhere else on Earth. Once part of the supercontinent of Gondwana, Socotra split off on its own millions of years ago, allowing its many unique species to flourish.
Many say visiting Socotra is like visiting another planet, which makes it a particularly popular bucket-list item. However, traveling there by sea has always been problematic due to two annual monsoons and the prevalence of pirates. Traveling by air, meanwhile, is only possible via mainland Yemen and that's ill-advised due to the country's ongoing civil war.

Motuo County, China


Motuo County, nestled on the southern side of the Himalayas, is the only place in all of China with no roads leading in or out — but it's not for lack of trying. Forces of nature like mudslides and avalanches have thwarted previous attempts to build any kind of access roads into the area.
Although it's one of the most remote places in the world, it is possible to visit Motuo — but be ready for anything. People looking to visit this beautiful and mysterious place must trek across the treacherous Himalayas and cross a 200-meter long suspension bridge to get there. Hold on tight.

Monday, July 29, 2019

The Tyranny of the Police State Disguised as Law & Order

This is the sorry plight of so-called democracies in the West in general and America, in particular!
By John W. Whitehead
Global Research, July 24, 2019
“But these weren’t the kind of monsters that had tentacles and rotting skin, the kind a seven-year-old might be able to wrap his mind around—they were monsters with human faces, in crisp uniforms, marching in lockstep, so banal you don’t recognize them for what they are until it’s too late.” ? Ransom Riggs, Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children

Enough already.

Enough with the distractions. Enough with the partisan jousting.

Enough with the sniping and name-calling and mud-slinging that do nothing to make this country safer or freer or more just.

We have let the government’s evil-doing, its abuses, power grabs, brutality, meanness, inhumanity, immorality, greed, corruption, debauchery and tyranny go on for too long.

We are approaching a reckoning.

This is the point, as the poet W. B. Yeats warned, when things fall apart and anarchy is loosed upon the world.

We have seen this convergence before in Hitler’s Germany, in Stalin’s Russia, in Mussolini’s Italy, and in Mao’s China: the rise of strongmen and demagogues, the ascendency of profit-driven politics over deep-seated principles, the warring nationalism that seeks to divide and conquer, the callous disregard for basic human rights and dignity, and the silence of people who should know better.

Yet no matter how many times the world has been down this road before, we can’t seem to avoid repeating the deadly mistakes of the past. This is not just playing out on a national and international scale. It is wreaking havoc at the most immediate level, as well, creating rifts and polarities within families and friends, neighborhoods and communities that keep the populace warring among themselves and incapable of presenting a united front in the face of the government’s goose-stepping despotism.

We are definitely in desperate need of a populace that can stand united against the government’s authoritarian tendencies.

Surely we can manage to find some common ground in the midst of the destructive, disrupting, diverting, discordant babble being beamed down at us by the powers-that-be? After all, there are certain self-evident truths—about the source of our freedoms, about the purpose of government, about how we expect to be treated by those we appoint to serve us in government offices, about what to do when the government abuses our rights and our trust, etc.—that we should be able to agree on, no matter how we might differ politically.

Disagree all you want about healthcare, abortion and immigration—hot-button issues that are guaranteed to stir up the masses, secure campaign contributions and turn political discourse into a circus free-for-all—but never forget that our power as a citizenry comes from our ability to agree and stand united on certain principles that should be non-negotiable.

For instance, for the first time in the nation’s history, it is expected that the federal deficit will surpass $1 trillion this year, not to mention the national debt which is approaching $23 trillion. There’s also $21 trillion in government spending that cannot be accounted for or explained. For those in need of a quick reminder: “A budget deficit is the difference between what the federal government spends and what it takes in. The national debt is the result of the federal government borrowing money to cover years and years of budget deficits.” Right now, the U.S. government is operating in the negative on every front: it’s spending far more than what it makes (and takes from the American taxpayers) and it is borrowing heavily (from foreign governments and Social Security) to keep the government operating and keep funding its endless wars abroad. Meanwhile, the nation’s sorely neglected infrastructure—railroads, water pipelines, ports, dams, bridges, airports and roads—is rapidly deteriorating.

Yet no matter how we might differ about how the government allocates its spending, surely we can agree that the government’s irresponsible spending, which has saddled us with insurmountable debt, is pushing the country to the edge of financial and physical ruin.

That’s just one example of many that shows the extent to which the agents of the American police state are shredding the constitutional fabric of the nation, eclipsing the rights of the American people, and perverting basic standards of decency.

Let me give you a few more.

Having been co-opted by greedy defense contractors, corrupt politicians and incompetent government officials, America’s expanding military empire is bleeding the country dry at a rate of more than $15 billion a month (or $20 million an hour)—and that’s just what the government spends on foreign wars. The U.S. military empire’s determination to police the rest of the world has resulted in more than 1.3 million U.S. troops being stationed at roughly 1000 military bases in over 150 countries around the world. That doesn’t include the number of private contractors pulling in hefty salaries at taxpayer expense. In Afghanistan, for example, private contractors outnumber U.S. troops three to one.

Pity the Nation: War Spending Is Bankrupting America

No matter how we might differ about the role of the U.S. military in foreign affairs, surely we can agree that America’s war spending and commitment to policing the rest of the world are bankrupting the nation and spreading our troops dangerously thin.

All of the imperial powers amassed by Barack Obama and George W. Bush—to kill American citizens without due process, to detain suspects indefinitely, to strip Americans of their citizenship rights, to carry out mass surveillance on Americans without probable cause, to suspend laws during wartime, to disregard laws with which they might disagree, to conduct secret wars and convene secret courts, to sanction torture, to sidestep the legislatures and courts with executive orders and signing statements, to direct the military to operate beyond the reach of the law, to operate a shadow government, and to act as a dictator and a tyrant, above the law and beyond any real accountability—were inherited by Donald Trump. These presidential powers—acquired through the use of executive orders, decrees, memorandums, proclamations, national security directives and legislative signing statements and which can be activated by any sitting president—enable past, president and future presidents to operate above the law and beyond the reach of the Constitution.

Yet no matter how we might differ about how success or failure of past or present presidential administrations, surely we can agree that the president should not be empowered to act as an imperial dictator with permanent powers.

Increasingly, at home, we’re facing an unbelievable show of force by government agents. For example, with alarming regularity, unarmed men, women, children and even pets are being gunned down by twitchy, hyper-sensitive, easily-spooked police officers who shoot first and ask questions later, and all the government does is shrug and promise to do better. Just recently, in fact, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals cleared a cop who aimed for a family’s dog (who showed no signs of aggression), missed, and instead shot a 10-year-old lying on the ground. Indeed, there are countless incidents that happen every day in which Americans are shot, stripped, searched, choked, beaten and tasered by police for little more than daring to frown, smile, question, or challenge an order. Growing numbers of unarmed people are being shot and killed for just standing a certain way, or moving a certain way, or holding something—anything—that police could misinterpret to be a gun, or igniting some trigger-centric fear in a police officer’s mind that has nothing to do with an actual threat to their safety.

No matter how we might differ about where to draw that blue line of allegiance to the police state, surely we can agree that police shouldn’t go around terrorizing and shooting innocent, unarmed children and adults or be absolved of wrongdoing for doing so.

Nor can we turn a blind eye to the transformation of America’s penal system from one aimed at protecting society from dangerous criminals to a profit-driven system that dehumanizes and strips prisoners of every vestige of their humanity. For example, in Illinois, as part of a “training exercise” for incoming cadets, prison guards armed with batons and shields rounded up 200 handcuffed female inmates, marched them to the gymnasium, then forced them to strip naked (including removing their tampons and pads), “bend over and spread open their vaginal and anal cavities,” while male prison guards promenaded past or stood staring. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the entire dehumanizing, demoralizing mass body cavity strip search—orchestrated not for security purposes but as an exercise in humiliation—was legal. Be warned, however: this treatment will not be limited to those behind bars. In our present carceral state, there is no difference between the treatment meted out to a law-abiding citizen and a convicted felon: both are equally suspect and treated as criminals, without any of the special rights and privileges reserved for the governing elite. In a carceral state, there are only two kinds of people: the prisoners and the prison guards.

No matter how we might differ about where to draw the line when it comes to prisoners’ rights, surely we can agree that no one—woman, man or child—should be subjected to such degrading treatment in the name of law and order.

In Washington, DC, in contravention of longstanding laws that restrict the government’s ability to deploy the military on American soil, the Pentagon has embarked on a secret mission of “undetermined duration” that involves flying Black Hawk helicopters over the nation’s capital, backed by active-duty and reserve soldiers. In addition to the increasing militarization of the police—a de facto standing army—this military exercise further acclimates the nation to the sight and sounds of military personnel on American soil and the imposition of martial law.

No matter how we might differ about the deference due to those in uniform, whether military or law enforcement, surely we can agree that America’s Founders had good reason to warn against the menace of a national police force—a.k.a. a standing army—vested with the power to completely disregard the Constitution.

We labor today under the weight of countless tyrannies, large and small, disguised as “the better good,” marketed as benevolence, enforced with armed police, and carried out by an elite class of government officials who are largely insulated from the ill effects of their actions. For example, in Pennsylvania, a school district is threatening to place children in foster care if parents don’t pay their overdue school lunch bills. In Florida, a resident was fined $100,000 for a dirty swimming pool and overgrown grass at a house she no longer owned. In Kentucky, government bureaucrats sent a cease-and-desist letter to a church ministry, warning that the group is breaking the law by handing out free used eyeglasses to the homeless. These petty tyrannies inflicted on an overtaxed, over-regulated, and underrepresented populace are what happens when bureaucrats run the show, and the rule of law becomes little more than a cattle prod for forcing the citizenry to march in lockstep with the government.

No matter how we might differ about the extent to which the government has the final say in how it flexes it power and exerts its authority, surely we can agree that the tyranny of the Nanny State — disguised as “the better good,” marketed as benevolence, enforced with armed police, and inflicted on all those who do not belong to the elite ruling class that gets to call the shots— should not be allowed to pave over the Constitution.

At its core, this is not a debate about politics, or constitutionalism, or even tyranny disguised as law-and-order. This is a condemnation of the monsters with human faces that have infiltrated our government.

For too long now, the American people have rationalized turning a blind eye to all manner of government wrongdoing—asset forfeiture schemes, corruption, surveillance, endless wars, SWAT team raids, militarized police, profit-driven private prisons, and so on—because they were the so-called lesser of two evils.

Yet the unavoidable truth is that the government has become almost indistinguishable from the evil it claims to be fighting, whether that evil takes the form of terrorism, torture, drug trafficking, sex trafficking, murder, violence, theft, pornography, scientific experimentations or some other diabolical means of inflicting pain, suffering and servitude on humanity.

No matter how you rationalize it, the lesser of two evils is still evil.

So how do you fight back?

How do you fight injustice? How do you push back against tyranny? How do you vanquish evil?

You don’t fight it by hiding your head in the sand.

We have ignored the warning signs all around us for too long.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the government has ripped the Constitution to shreds and left us powerless in the face of its power grabs, greed and brutality.

What we are grappling with today is a government that is cutting great roads through the very foundations of freedom in order to get after its modern devils. Yet the government can only go as far as “we the people” allow.

Therein lies the problem.

The consequences of this failure to do our due diligence in asking the right questions, demanding satisfactory answers, and holding our government officials accountable to respecting our rights and abiding by the rule of law has pushed us to the brink of a nearly intolerable state of affairs.

Intolerable, at least, to those who remember what it was like to live in a place where freedom, due process and representative government actually meant something. Having allowed the government to expand and exceed our reach, we now find ourselves on the losing end of a tug-of-war over control of our country and our lives.

The hour grows late in terms of restoring the balance of power and reclaiming our freedoms, but it may not be too late. The time to act is now, using all methods of nonviolent resistance available to us.

“Don’t sit around waiting for the two corrupted established parties to restore the Constitution or the Republic,” Naomi Wolf once warned. Waiting and watching will get us nowhere fast.

If you’re watching, you’re not doing.

Easily mesmerized by the government’s political theater—the endless congressional hearings and investigations that go nowhere, the president’s reality show antics, the warring factions, the electoral drama—we have become a society of watchers rather than activists who are distracted by even the clumsiest government attempts at sleight-of-hand.

It’s time for good men and women to do something. And soon.

Wake up and take a good, hard look around you. Start by recognizing evil and injustice and tyranny for what they are. Stop being apathetic. Stop being neutral. Stop being accomplices. Stop being distracted by the political theater staged by the Deep State: they want you watching the show while they manipulate things behind the scenes. Refuse to play politics with your principles. Don’t settle for the lesser of two evils.

As British statesman Edmund Burke warned, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men [and women] to do nothing.”

Revealing emotions with colours!

For those wondering how this study might be useful, in psychotherapy it could be helpful as a simple tool for working with patients who have difficulty identifying and expressing their emotions. For those patients who can only say they simply feel "good" or "bad" one might be able to show them these images so they can link how they feel physically to putting a name to their feeling state.

By Gemma Tarlach, December 30, 2013
Chests puffing up with pride — and happiness felt head to toe — are sensations as real as they are universal. And now we can make an atlas of them.
Researchers have long known that emotions are connected to a range of physiological changes, from nervous job candidates’ sweaty palms to the racing pulse that results from hearing a strange noise at night. But new research reveals that emotional states are universally associated with certain bodily sensations, regardless of individuals’ culture or language.

Once More With Feeling
More than 700 participants in Finland, Sweden and Taiwan participated in experiments aimed at mapping their bodily sensations in connection with specific emotions. Participants viewed emotion-laden words, videos, facial expressions and stories. They then self-reported areas of their bodies that felt different than before they’d viewed the material. By coloring in two computer-generated silhouettes — one to note areas of increased bodily sensation and the second to mark areas of decreased sensation — participants were able to provide researchers with a broad base of data showing both positive and negative bodily responses to different emotions.

Researchers found statistically discrete areas for each emotion tested, such as happiness, contempt and love, that were consistent regardless of respondents’ nationality. Afterward, researchers applied controls to reduce the risk that participants may have been biased by sensation-specific phrases common to many languages (such as the English “cold feet” as a metaphor for fear, reluctance or hesitation). The results are published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Hot-Headed
Although each emotion produced a specific map of bodily sensation, researchers did identify some areas of overlap. Basic emotions, such as anger and fear, caused an increase in sensation in the upper chest area, likely corresponding to increases in pulse and respiration rate. Happiness was the only emotion tested that increased sensation all over the body.

The findings enhance researchers’ understanding of how we process emotions. Despite differences in culture and language, it appears our physical experience of feelings is remarkably consistent across different populations. The researchers believe that further development of these bodily sensation maps may one day result in a new way of identifying and treating emotional disorders.

Saturday, July 27, 2019

Obscene US military spending...

While US lawmakers can't find enough money to spend on infrastructure, healthcare or education, they have no problem to pour outrageous amounts of money in unproductive sectors like armament industry...


By Philip A Farruggio
Global Research, July 05, 2019
This writer has been focusing tirelessly on the (obscene) fact that over half of our federal taxes goes down the rabbit hole of military spending. Well, writer and researcher Andre Damon of the World Socialist Website just wrote a piece on July 1st on this very subject. He stated that under phony populist demagogue Trump the Senate (with the help of 36 Democrats) passed the largest ever Pentagon budget. Taking over from Democrat Obama, where under his watch the said budgets even surpassed the ones under the war mongering Bush/Cheney cabal, ‘The hits just keep on comin!’ From the $619 billion in 2016 to $700 billion in 2017 to the $716 billion in 2018 to…drum roll please… $750 billion passed last Thursday. This now makes military spending AKA Defense spending (has a better ‘secure our borders’ flavor to it, yes?) accounting for… drum roll again… around 60% of the federal budget!

Imagine if you will that if just 25% of that money immediately went for things like A) Jump starting full Medicare for All with no need for buying supplemental private add on insurance (Read Which Path to National Improved Medicare for All?) B) Fixing our roads, bridges, power distribution below ground like in Europe, and money to sure up coastal areas to stand up to hurricanes better; C) Having an Amtrak to rival the railroad travel and accessibility that the Europeans have had for generations; D) Begin to institute public banking whereupon, with low or non profit, the consumer will save immeasurably. (Read The Public Banking Revolution Is Upon Us by Ellen Brown)

To put things into perspective, according to Andre Damon, Russia’s annual military budget is $61 billion, and they sure as hell kept our USA wolf from overtaking Syria and Venezuela! He goes on to report that the Democratic controlled House of Representatives is only proposing a $733 billion Pentagon budget. That’s some Green Deal hah? One surmises that most of those new Dems, you know the myriad of ex military and CIA folks, must have joined with their bipartisan colleagues to keep the money rolling into the War Economy and OUT of the Green Economy.

When will Sanders and AOC and the handful of true progressives walk away from that corruption? What in the hell good is it to belong to a party that may win elections, and then do as little as possible to help we working stiffs… AND make the world a little less crazy. Duh, it’s called ‘Lead by example’! As far as the other and much more ruthless party, they are far beyond help. Yet, half of the voting suckers choose them for a myriad of reasons… yet never to save their working stiff asses! So sad this country that I love.

= = =
Philip A Farruggio is a contributing editor for The Greanville Post. He is also frequently posted on Global Research, Nation of Change, World News Trust and Off Guardian sites. He is the son and grandson of Brooklyn NYC longshoremen and a graduate of Brooklyn College, class of 1974. Since the 2000 election debacle Philip has written over 300 columns on the Military Industrial Empire and other facets of life in an upside down America. He is also host of the ‘It’s the Empire… Stupid‘ radio show, co produced by Chuck Gregory. Philip can be reached at paf1222@bellsouth.net

Reason behind the revolving door invention...

Believe it or not, revolving door was invented as a gesture of goodwill to women! Read on...


by Ashley Hamer
April 29, 2017
If you've ever been flummoxed by a revolving door — who goes in first? Do we go together, or one at a time? How do you keep your rolling suitcase from getting caught? — you have one person to thank: a man by the name of Theophilus van Kannel. Legend has it he invented the device to keep from having to hold open doors for women. His goal seems to have backfired, but his innovation still offers important benefits to this day.

After You? No, After Me

Theophilus van Kannel was born in Pennsylvania in 1841. Though his past is mysterious, it is believed that van Kannel invented the revolutionary door in order to avoid having to hold doors for women. According to the podcast 99% Invisible, "There was nothing he despised more than trying to walk in or out of a building and locking horns with other men in a game of 'oh you first, I insist.'"

He patented his "storm-door structure" in 1888, which included weather stripping to prevent energy loss. The first revolving door was installed at a Times Square restaurant called Rectors in 1889. This invention solved numerous problems that traditional doors couldn't answer. They help regulate temperature and air pressure, thereby saving up to 30 percent of energy costs. An MIT study also found that they exchange eight times less air than traditional doors.

Sorry, Theo

Unfortunately, the world we live in is far off from that straightforward, chivalry-free society van Kammel had dreamed of. When it comes to society, revolving doors created more problems than they solved. For one thing, nobody uses them. That same MIT study found that only 20 to 30 percent of people opt to use revolving doors, while the rest head for the traditional doors.

Revolving doors have also been an etiquette nightmare. Sure, men don't have to hold the door for women, now. But should they let women go first? RealSimple asked this question, and about half of readers said yes. That's at the level of chance — not a good sign for the next time you're facing off with a stranger at a revolving door. But according to Park Hyatt Chicago doorman Joe Snyder, ladies first is the wrong approach. Because the first person to go through has to do most of the pushing, Snyder says the man should go first. "A gentleman should always go first and assist the woman through the revolving door, and I observe this on a daily basis," he told RealSimple. Sorry, Theo — when you fix one problem, you often just create more.