Wednesday, May 15, 2024

50 mis-dis information and covid lies by Australian govt

50 misinformation, disinformation and outright covid lies told by the Australian government and regulators
By Rhoda Wilson on October 13, 2023

When it was confirmed that governments around the world released covid-19 “vaccines” which were made in a different way to clinical trial “vaccines” and that the commercial batches were contaminated with toxic DNA and endotoxins, Dr. Phillip Altman added it to his growing list of misinformation, disinformation and lies the public have been told.

The Pfizer Covid-19 “Vaccine” – Bait and Switch
By Dr. Phillip Altman

Did people get injected with a “vaccine” which was never subjected to safety testing in any clinical trial?

The British government and all drug regulators know about endotoxins. They are among the most toxic group of biochemicals known.

Endotoxin contamination in an injection is very dangerous and might kill people immediately following injection.

My Substack of 5 October explained this in detail.  Read more HERE.

This must be part of any serious investigation into the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and our Australian health bureaucrats who either did not know, did not understand or covered up. This is serious.

I’VE REACHED 50!

Not 50 years old……you silly thing. I mean my list of misinformation, disinformation and lies has now reached 50. See below:

1. Failure to recognise that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is of laboratory origin.

2. Implementation of cruel lockdowns without any scientific evidence of usefulness.

3. Declare experimental gene-based mRNA injections as “safe and effective” when this was not supported by the available evidence.  The 95% efficacy claim was false. The covid “vaccines” have been reported to cause more death and injury than any drug in history.

4. Failure of the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (“TGA”) to properly evaluate the covid injections for quality, safety and efficacy.

The TGA said the covid “vaccines” were properly assessed and proven to be safe.

5. Failure to stop senseless vaccine mandates when there was never any evidence that the injections would stop transmission.

6. Falsely claiming the covid injections would keep you from getting covid, getting seriously ill or going to the hospital.  The hospital statistics show this is false.

7. Falsely claiming masks prevent transmission or infection. There is no credible evidence that masks prevent transmission or acquisition of air-borne viral infection.

8. Falsely claiming it was a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.”

9. Ramping up public fear to force people into getting “vaccinated.”

10. Denying early treatment which could have saved thousands of lives.  Such advice has never been given in medicine for any serious infection.

11. Orchestrating and supporting outrageous epidemiologic claims of expected deaths (150,000 predicted by the Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity sponsored by Bill and Melinda Gates).

12. Failure to properly assess thousands of vaccine-related deaths reported in adverse drug event reporting systems including the Database of Adverse Event Notifications (“DAEN”).

13. Courts failing to consider the scientific facts regarding covid and the lack of safety and efficacy of covid injections.

14. Contributing to the media censorship of any scientist or doctor who criticised the government narrative of “vaccine” safety and efficacy.

15. Permitting the Australian Professional Health Regulation Agency (“APHRA”) to suspend the registration of any health practitioner who disagreed with the government covid management policy.

16. Preventing proper and full informed consent given to patients by doctors prior to covid injections – patients were not fully advised of the risks.

17. Falsely stating it was safe to use covid injections for babies, children and pregnant women when there was no credible data to support such use.

18. Falsely inflating “covid case” numbers and deaths using an inappropriate test (“PCR”) to justify population-wide covid injections.

19. Failure to recognise or investigate natural immunity in relation to vaccine policy.

20. Falsely claiming there was no clinical evidence to support ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of covid-19.

21. Destroying millions of doses of hydroxychloroquine and blocking the prescribing of ivermectin for covid-19.

22. Manipulating Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) mortality data and Excess Death data using data analysis which effectively minimises the impact of All-Cause Mortality following covid “vaccine” rollout.

23. Permitting and facilitating plans for a World Health Organisation (“WHO”) takeover of future Australian government pandemic health policy by unelected, unaccountable and unelected bureaucrats connected to the vaccine industry and apex predators of the World Economic Forum (“WEF”).

24. Maintaining total secrecy surrounding the contracted arrangements with vaccine manufacturers and spending hundreds of billions of dollars needlessly on unscientific and unsound covid pandemic policies.

25. Brutally suppressing peaceful demonstrations using rubber bullets and physical force never before witnessed in Australia.

26. Proceeding to build pharmaceutical plants to produce “vaccines” using the mRNA platform without any long-term safety data and with the full knowledge these injections have produced the highest reported incidence of death and serious adverse events of any vaccine in history.

27. Failure to explain or investigate the cause of the non-covid unexpected Excess Deaths following the covid “vaccine” rollouts (estimated at 30,000).

28. Failure to conduct a proper risk/benefit assessment of lockdowns, vaccine mandates or covid “vaccination” OR to enquire why other countries had much fewer “cases” and deaths despite having much smaller health care budgets.

29. Failure of the TGA to report ongoing cases of myocarditis and pericarditis associated with the covid “vaccines.”

30. Failure to properly assess the ongoing safety and efficacy of modified covid “vaccines” in light of worldwide reports of serious adverse events and death. Vaccine manufacturers and drug regulators were overwhelmed with the number of adverse event reports and there is probably a huge backlog of reports to be assessed.

31. Failure to report hospital covid vaccination status of covid patients in ICU and dying “with” or “due to” covid.

32. Failure to adequately explain 9 child deaths post-vaccination reported to the Drug Adverse Event Notification (“DAEN”) scheme.

33. Failure to investigate and report on multiple international reports of problems of covid “vaccine” quality control (high death rate following certain batches).

34. Failure to disclose to the public the vested interests of so-called “health experts,” expert committees and institutions providing public advice.

35. The TGA falsely claimed there is no evidence that covid “vaccines” might interfere with your own DNA or have intergenerational adverse effects.

36. The government knows and did not warn that the covid “vaccines” do not stay at the site of injection but travel throughout the body and the mRNA in the injections produce Spike Protein which has been shown to be directly responsible for the observed heart attacks, stroke, neurological diseases etc.

37. The government made no distinction between the minimal to near zero risk of covid-19 in the young vs the risk to the elderly and exposed millions of younger Australians to needless gene-based mRNA injections which may have longer-term adverse effects.

38. The Australian government divided society and demonised those who wisely chose not to receive the covid injections by promoting the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” concept.

39. Despite unprecedented numbers of vaccine injured, compensation has been rare and minimal.  Our government protects the vaccine manufacturers with full indemnity – amazing!

40. The effect of the covid injections on fertility and miscarriages has been widely reported worldwide yet our TGA has not raised any concern.

41. Failure to admit mistakes and harm or to even investigate ways to improve future policies and strategies by conducting a Royal Commission.

42. We were not told that judges, parliamentarians and their staff were exempt from vaccine mandates.

43. The TGA have not responded to repeated worldwide observations and reports that the batches of covid-19 “vaccines” were not made in the same way as the clinical trial batches. The commercial batches were made using fermentation techniques using E. coli bacteria resulting in contamination of the vaccine vials with toxic DNA material which can potentially reverse transcribe into your DNA.  

44. Cheating in clinical trial data management and analysis (e.g., counting people who died suddenly and unexpectedly within 2 weeks after injection as “unvaccinated.”

45. Approval for use of remdesivir despite lack of safety and efficacy data and failure to give appropriate warnings about kidney toxicity to covid patients.

46. Discontinued reporting of the vaccination status of seriously ill covid-19 patients in hospital (unvaccinated vs vaccinated). The vast majority of covid-19 patients are fully vaccinated and boosted.

47. Failure by the Australian Government to investigate more than 30,000 non-covid unexplained deaths following the rollout of the covid-19 “vaccines.”

48. Failure to properly compensate the vaccine injured and those who have died due to covid-19 vaccination.

49. The Victorian State government and other State governments sometimes inflate the number of “unvaccinated covid-19 deaths” by including many vaccinated people whose vaccination status is either unknown or would later be confirmed.   

50. The governments around the world released covid-19 “vaccines” which were made in a different way to clinical trial “vaccines.”  The commercial batches were contaminated with toxic DNA and endotoxins which could cause sudden death and serious side effects and governments knew this.

About the Author

Phillip Altman, PhD, is a retired Pharmacologist with more than 40 years of experience in clinical medical research and pharmaceutical drug regulatory affairs in Australia. He earned a Bachelor’s degree in Pharmacy with honours from Sydney University, followed by his Masters and then a PhD in drug development.  He publishes articles on a Substack page which you can subscribe to and follow HERE.

Australian Govt covering up mass covid vax deaths!

Senator Malcolm Roberts has raised the alarm...

Top Australian Senator Blows Whistle: Government Covering Up Mass Covid Vax Deaths
Frank Bergman
May 14, 2024

A prominent Australian lawmaker has blown the whistle on a shocking cover-up by his nation’s federal government.

Senator Malcolm Roberts has raised the alarm after uncovering evidence that governments around the world are aware that Covid mRNA shots are killing people.

According to Roberts, the Australian government has been scrambling to cover up the mass deaths caused by the injections.

As part of the effort, the government has been “deliberately suppressing doctors” from reporting vaccine deaths, the top senator reveals.

Roberts says that governments around the world all know about vaccine harms and that they are “killing people.”

According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), in 2022, 174,717 deaths occurred.

This figure is 22,886 (15.1%) more than the historical average.

A growing number of experts and studies have confirmed that this spike was caused by the Covid mRNA shot.

Roberts describes the soaring vax deaths as the “pandemic of injections.”

The senator blew the whistle during a bombshell interview on the “You’re the Voice” podcast with host Efrat Fenigson.

    REPORT: The Australian government KNOWS the COVID shots are killing people, and they are “deliberately suppressing doctors” from reporting vaccine deaths.

    This allegation comes from Senator Malcolm Roberts.

    He says the government “can’t not know” about vaccine harms and that… pic.twitter.com/WR6FXLlCYI   — The Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) May 13, 2024

Roberts is an Australian politician from Queensland and a member of the Australian Senate.

With a background in engineering, mining, business, and economics, Senator Roberts is a climate realist who challenges the globalist dogma.

 He frequently pushes back mainstream “climate science” and exposes lies in this field.

Unlike most politicians these days, Senator Roberts is a truth-teller who does not shy away from issues such as public health, Covid, immigration, finance, economics, sexual education for children, and more.

During the interview with Fenigson, Roberts discusses the anti-human globalist agenda and how it manifested in Australia over the past few years.

The senator details his fight against climate fraud, and his efforts to help those injured by Covid shots.

He also exposes the soaring excess deaths while encouraging people to reclaim their power by holding politicians accountable.

The senator criticizes the centralization of government and the media by globalists, introducing new levels of censorship on Australians.

The conversation concludes with monetary and economic changes in Australia, including the move to the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “cashless society,” Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), digital IDs, 15-minute cities, and more.

Roberts highlights the importance of simplicity and the power of individual responsibility in creating positive change and waking people up to the truth.

He concludes with a message of hope, urging individuals to be proud of their humanity and to share information to help others become informed.

FULL VIDEO:

    “Control vs. Freedom” 🎙️You’re The Voice – Ep. 28: Senator Malcolm Roberts@MRobertsQLD @YoureTheVoiceEF

    My guest today is Senator Malcolm Roberts, an Australian politician from Queensland and a member of the Australian Senate. With a background in engineering, mining, business… pic.twitter.com/8o6vMtbFTm   — Efrat Fenigson (@efenigson) May 8, 2024

The warning from Roberts comes as multiple whistleblowers have come forward recently with similar allegations.

As Slay News reported, a top scientist has just blown the whistle to warn the public that Covid mRNA injections trigger HIV in recipients.

Dr. Judy Mikovits, a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) whistleblower, lifted the lid on the Covid shots during an explosive new interview.

Mikovits says that Covid shots are actually part of a binary weapon system that was developed by criminals within and outside of the U.S. government.

Billions of people, including millions of Americans, were unfortunate enough to be injected with the SARS-CoV-2 genetic mutagen, she warns.

She says those who have received the injection have been the unfortunate victims of an intentional attack on humanity using gain-of-function biological weapons that were developed in U.S. and Chinese laboratories.

Mikovits asserts that Covid mRNA shots trigger HIV in those who received the infections.

“Every single Injection has SV40 in it,” Mikovits notes.

“Injection is infection.”

Fighting ‘Global Warming' via Mass Depopulation!

Climate Scientist Calls for Mass Depopulation to Fight ‘Global Warming’
Frank Bergman
May 14, 2024

A top government climate scientist has called for a major “culling of the human population” in order to fight “global warming.”

Professor Bill McGuire argues that a “pandemic with a very high fatality rate” is required to wipe out a large portion of the human race.

According to McGuire, a mass depopulation event is “the only realistic way” to “avoid a catastrophic climate breakdown.”

McGuire, a Professor of Geophysical & Climate Hazards at University College London (UCL), said the quiet part out loud in a post on X on Sunday.

“If I am brutally honest, the only realistic way I see emissions falling as fast as they need to, to avoid catastrophic #climate breakdown, is the culling of the human population by a pandemic with a very high fatality rate,” he wrote.

A backlash to the comments quickly ensued as social media users blasted the professor over the comments.

    If half the people on Earth die suddenly we can avoid catastrophe!
    — That One Guy Who Is Always Right. (@RickLazzarini) May 12, 2024

McGuire responded to the blow-back by deleting the post.

In a follow-up post, McGuire claimed that people were deliberately taking his words out of context.

    RIGHT, I AM DELETING THE INITIAL TWEET NOW. NOT BECAUSE I REGRET IT, BUT BECAUSE SO MANY PEOPLE OUT THERE HAVE MISTAKENLY, OR INTENTIONALLY, TAKEN IT THE WRONG WAY. pic.twitter.com/5S65IIN8Rb  — Bill McGuire (@ProfBillMcGuire) May 12, 2024

He then responded to angry comments by gaslighting people about what he said.

McGuire tried to claim he was talking about the economy and not death, despite specifically calling for “the culling of the human population by a pandemic with a very high fatality rate.”

    It’s about suddenly falling economic activity. Not people dying.  — Bill McGuire (@ProfBillMcGuire) May 12, 2024

McGuire clearly hoped he could convince people not to believe their lying eyes, but the Internet is forever and screenshots of his post quickly went viral.

    Interesting thing to say. pic.twitter.com/HN6WiMR161   — RAW EGG NATIONALIST (@Babygravy9) May 13, 2024

Alarmingly, McGuire was a member of a British government body that advised politicians on the COVID-19 response.

He also co-authored a report for the globalist United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

As Slay News has reported, the IPCC dictates climate policy to governments worldwide.

McGuire is also not the first radical globalist to suggest wiping out the human population to “save the planet” from “climate change,” however.

Members of the unelected World Economic Forum (WEF) have long been pushing this anti-human agenda, as Slay News reported.

The Switzerland-based globalist organization recently revealed details of a so-called “Noah’s Ark” that will supposedly “save the elite” during an event that would wipe out most humans on Earth.

The WEF has assured global “elites” that they will be saved from depopulation while “the rest” are left “to drown.”

Details of the stomach-churning plan were revealed by senior WEF official Yuval Noah Harari, a senior advisor to the group and its founder Klaus Schwab.

According to Harari, most of humanity will become “useless” and a “burden” for the handful of elites who control the “new” AI-driven world.

Speaking during a recent WEF panel, Harari laid out the plans for a mass depopulation event, assuring globalist “elites” that they would be spared.

If bad comes to worse,” Harari explains.

“When the ‘Flood’ comes, the scientists will build a ‘Noah’s ark’ for the elite – leaving the rest to drown.”

Harari acknowledged that the plan “doesn’t benefit the vast majority of civilization.”

More recently, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink also argued that countries that depopulate will be “big winners” in the New World Order.

Fink, who also serves on the board of directors at the WEF and is listed as one of the organization’s “agenda contributors,” made the comments during the WEF’s annual summit in Saudi Arabia earlier this month.

He declared that nations with “shrinking populations” are the “big winners” because globalists are pushing to “substitute humans with machines.”

“The social problems that one will have when substituting humans for machines is going to be far easier in those countries that have declining populations,” he concluded.

In 2017, a celebrated member of the WEF called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans, arguing that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”

The call was made by Dennis Meadows, one of the main authors of the Club of Rome’s 1972 pro-depopulation book “The Limits to Growth.”

Meadows is considered an architect of the WEF’s agenda with his theories on population numbers being central to the organization’s anti-human agenda.

He argues that most of the world’s population must be wiped out so that the survivors can “have freedom” and a “high standard of living.”

During a 2017 interview, Meadows claimed that genocide of 86% of the world’s population is “inevitable.”

However, he insists that a “benevolent” dictatorship could accomplish the mass de-population “peacefully.”

“We could [ ] have eight or nine billion, probably,” he says of the world’s growing population.

“If we have a very strong dictatorship which is smart … and [people have] a low standard of living,” Meadows says as he explains how the population reduction agenda could be triggered.

“But we want to have freedom and we want to have a high standard of living so we’re going to have a billion people.

He then warned that “we have to get back down” to just one billion people on earth.

However, a one billion global population is still too many humans for some globalists.

Another WEF member upped the ante by calling for more than a 90 percent reduction in humans, as Slay News reported.

English primatologist and anthropologist Jane Goodall, who the WEF lists as one of its “agenda contributors,” pushed the shocking suggestion for meeting the globalist organization’s “Net Zero” targets.

Goodall told her fellow globalists that they could “save the planet” from “global warming” if the Earth’s population was over 90 percent smaller than it is today.

Goodall argues that all of the WEF’s “problems” would be solved if fewer humans were walking the Earth.

The panel was discussing plans for achieving “Net Zero” to comply with the targets for “Agenda 2030” as dictated by the WEF and its fellow unelected globalist organization – the United Nations.

“We cannot hide away from human population growth,” she told frustrated elites.

“Because it underlies so many of the other problems,” she continued.

“All of these problems that we talk about wouldn’t be a problem if there was the size of the population that it was 500 years ago.”

As of May 2024, Earth’s human population is estimated to be 8.1 billion people.

500 years ago, as Goodall, a renowned anthropologist, would know, the population of humans was approximately 435 million.

To satisfy Goodall’s suggestion to solve globalists’ “problems,” 94.6% of humanity would need to go.

Dangers of Digital ID - Australian perspective

The Digital ID Bill threatens our basic privacy rights, and today, it’s being introduced into the House of Representatives. If it passes the House of Representatives, it becomes law… and then it’s not just your personal data on the line but also our cherished freedoms.

Given that the government has the numbers in the House of Reps, the only way to stop the Digital ID Bill is to convince marginal Labor MPs to take a stand against it.

Why would they? Good question! As marginal seat holders, these MPs will need to show voters that they not only listen to their voters but act on their voters’ concerns in order to keep their seats. By opposing the Digital ID Bill, they will be showing that they listen and act.

Let’s remind them who they serve — us!

George Christensen and the team at CitizenGO

P.S. Once signed, spread the word, every count matters! This is our privacy and liberty at stake!


Your privacy may be history within a week!

Our federal politicians are on the brink of launching a monstrous mechanism — the Digital ID Bill.

After ramming their Digital ID Bill through the Senate without debate, the Australian Government is wasting no time in getting their Digital Identity scheme through the House of Representatives.

Why should you care? Because if it’s passed by the House of Reps it becomes law. And that doesn’t just put your privacy at risk, it’s also a blow to your civil liberties!

Our reasons for this final petition to stop the Digital ID Bill are manifold.

The Australian Government’s decision to force a Digital Identity system on our nation opens up a Pandora’s box of privacy invasion, identity theft risks, and corrodes freedom.

Worse still, it paves the way for the ones on the top to watch and control while those on the lower echelons are monitored and controlled!

 Let me break down the real agenda behind this Orwellian nightmare that is the Digital ID Bill:

  • Invasion of Privacy: This Digital ID system is a Trojan horse for government and big business to invade your privacy. They want to track you through biometrics—your face, your fingerprints. Once they have this data, who knows what they'll do with it? This is about putting every one of us under the microscope.
  • Surveillance State: With this system, they can monitor everything—where you go, what you do. It’s the ultimate surveillance state, and it’s about to happen before your very eyes.
  • Tyrannical Overreach: This isn’t just about digital IDs; it’s about expanding government control over our lives. They’re eroding our freedoms, and if we don’t stand up now, what will be left?
  • Social Credit System: This is the first step towards a social credit system, folks. Today, it's a digital ID; tomorrow, it's controlling where you can go, what you can buy, and monitoring every move you make—just like in Communist China.
  • Corporate Snooping: Not only does the government get your data, but corporations do too. They're in cahoots, trading your privacy for profit. This is big brother in the corporate suit, watching everything you do.
  • Loss of Control: Say goodbye to control over your own information. The government and corporations will manipulate how your data is used, without real accountability. Once they have your data, they won't let go.
  • Hacker’s Paradise: By centralising all our sensitive data, the government is basically painting a giant bullseye on our personal information. This makes it a goldmine for hackers and cybercriminals. Your most personal details could be compromised in a heartbeat!
  • Compulsory Service Access: They say it’s not compulsory, but soon, you won’t be able to access essential services without this digital ID. It’s coercion, pure and simple.
  • Technological Discrimination: If you're not tech-savvy, you're out of luck. This system will marginalize anyone who can't keep up with digital trends, creating a new class of digital outcasts. That isn’t just unfair; it’s un-Australian.
  • Nobody Asked for This: Did you ever wake up thinking, 'I wish the government could track me more easily'? No, nobody wants this. It’s being forced on us, without real public demand or consultation.
  • Globalist Takeover: The World Economic Forum and the United Nations are behind this. They don’t care about national sovereignty. They want global control, and this digital ID is but one of their weapons.

These aren’t just concerns; they are red flags of an impending dystopia where our freedoms are traded for the illusion of security. We must resist this digital prison before it’s too late!

Click here to sign the petition! Help marginal government MPs in the House of Representatives understand the perils of a Digital ID scheme and urge them to make a stand to protect the privacy of Australians.

But here's what we've got going for us. The government MPs we are reaching out to are from what they call "marginal" electorates. With support for the government waning, these politicians must stand up, speak out and work hard for their voters in order to get re-elected.

Taking a stand and speaking out against an unpopular Digital ID Bill will be an easy way for them to show that they’ve got their voters’ best interests at heart. These marginal government MPs are our best bet to thwart the Digital ID Bill or facilitate its delay at the very least.

Imagine, on one hand a society crushed under the weight of Orwellian control, while on the other a society that actually values the inviolable space of individual privacy. We hold the power to direct the scales towards the latter. It's a fight we can't afford to lose!

But the hourglass is fast running out of sand. It’s up to us to make some noise and make it loud!

Thanks for all you do,

George Christensen and the team at CitizenGO

P.S. The clock is ticking on our privacy and liberties with each moment this Digital ID Bill edges closer to becoming law — this is a call to action for every Australian who values freedom! Sign the petition now, spread the word, and urge your representatives to oppose this Orwellian overreach before our rights are irretrievably lost.

More information:

Australia prepares for nationwide Digital ID rollout amid public consultation (Biometric Update)
https://www.biometricupdate.com/202405/australia-prepares-for-nationwide-digital-id-rollout-amid-public-consultation

Digital ID: privacy and liberty are brothers (The Spectator Australia)
https://www.spectator.com.au/2024/05/digital-id-privacy-and-liberty-are-brothers/

Craig Kelly on the Digital ID Bill legislation: "That is not the normal procedure!" (ADHTV)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuxGjEVTLQ8

Media and government silent on Digital IDs while thousands protest (Sky News Australia)
https://www.skynews.com.au/opinion/media-and-government-silent-on-digital-ids-while-thousands-protest/video/fdb76d045e171ac4eb44f2f94571602a

The social impact of digital ID (The Mandarin)
https://www.themandarin.com.au/244875-digital-id-social-impact

A government of the bureaucrats, by the bureaucrats, and for the bureaucrats (Politicom)
https://politicom.com.au/a-government-of-the-bureaucrats-by-the-bureaucrats-and-for-the-bureaucrats/

Australian Digital ID Bill ‘Might Not Be as Voluntary as They Say’: Senator (The Epoch Times)
https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/australian-digital-id-bill-might-not-be-as-voluntary-as-they-say-senator-5631924

Digital ID could link with ‘Misinformation’ Bill, Digital Currency

Senator Warns Digital ID could link with ‘Misinformation’ Bill, Digital Currency
Thousands have gathered at rallies across major capital cities to protest Australia’s impending national digital ID.
By Monica O’Shea
5/6/2024

Fears of a social credit system in Australia have been relayed by political figures during multiple rallies against the digital ID on the weekend.

Events in Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane on May 5 were attended by thousands who opposed the impending national digital ID legislation.

The protests come after the Australian Senate passed the Digital ID Bill in late March, with support from senators from the centre-left Labor Party, the Australian Greens, Jacqui Lambie, and independents.

The bill establishes a legislative framework for Australians to start using the new program that can help with identity verification with both government and businesses. It will work in conjunction with the MyGov platform that already links to government services like Centrelink, Medicare, and the Australian Tax Office.

While the bill has passed the Senate, it is yet to be introduced into the House of Representatives where the Labor Party has the numbers.

 

A ‘Social Credit’ System During a speech in Sydney, New South Wales state Libertarian Party MP

John Ruddick said the national ID was akin to a Beijing-style “social credit” system, and that it would not remain voluntary for long.

“Now look it is going to at first seem wonderfully convenient to have this digital ID. You are not going to have to shuffle around your different 100 points of ID. It’s going to seem great to these people,” the libertarian politician said.

 

 

ANALYSIS: Digital ID Deadline Looms, Yet Only 8 Percent of Indonesians Are Onboard

Australian Digital ID Bill ‘Might Not Be as Voluntary as They Say’: Senator
 

“And the truth is, that they have set up a turn key operation so they can have a Beijing style social credit system at the tip of a hat. And they are telling us, yeah we could do that but trust us, we won’t.”

The Libertarian parliamentarian warned that a future crisis could cause the shift.

“What will happen is, maybe for 10 years, maybe for 20 years it will all be fine, we won’t even think about it, and we’ve got this digital ID.

“And then there will be a crisis, an unprecedented crisis ... and then they'll say, look, this is an unprecedented crisis in the history of the world, we need these emergency temporary powers to bring in a social credit system. That’s what will happen,” he added.

My opening remarks at the anti-digital ID rally yesterday in Sydney were: 'My name is John Ruddick and I am a conspiracy theorist.'

Thank you for organising @CraigKellyPHON pic.twitter.com/HnxeYfO9Gk — John Ruddick MLC (@JohnRuddick2) May 5, 2024

 

 

Digital ID to Work in Tandem With Misinformation Bill, Digital Currency: Senator

Meanwhile, One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts speaking in Queensland, also raised fears of a social credit system.

In Mr. Roberts’ view, the digital ID bill was linking to several other programs and laws.

He flagged the identify verification bill, misinformation bill, the new payments platform the Reserve Bank was considering in digital currency, as well as the ongoing cashless push by banks.


“What you can see here is a framework for a social credit system. Complete control of every citizen of Australia. Whether you like it or not,” Mr. Roberts said.

 “The good news is they tell us it’s voluntary. Just like the COVID vaccine system. You just won’t be able to feed your kids if you don’t get it. You won’t be able to access government services, funds, travel, education ...”

The One Nation Senator, who voted against the legislation in the Senate, said the digital ID will allow the government to aggregate all data in one place and “sell it.”

“Now MyGov already links driver’s licences, passports, Medicare cards, [and] vaccination records. And now if it passes through the House of Representatives, if it passes, the digital ID will link all government data related to each person in this country,” he said.

“No privacy whatsoever. 350,000 federal public servants can see everything about you and me. Everything. And it will enable them to withhold services if you don’t comply. This is like a totalitarian regime.”

Mr. Roberts said the real kicker is future amendments of the digital ID to “pair the government’s data” with private sector data, including purchasing records, to create a “rich digital view of each and every citizen.”

Opening a Bank Account Could be Impacted: Senator
 

One issue discovered by centre-right Liberal Senator Alex Antic was how individuals could struggle to open bank accounts.

The senator pointed to section 74 of the legislation, which states that, “Creating and using a digital ID is voluntary.” However, under section 74 (2), a bank is not breaking the law if they require a digital identity for their online service, because customers can still go to bank branches.

He noted that online banking will become even more prominent in the years ahead, and the number of physical branches and ATM’s will “probably decrease.”

Mr. Antic also noted the digital ID regulator is able to grant an exemption to the voluntary nature of the legislation “if the digital ID regulator is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so.”

An Epoch Times analysis of the government’s explanatory memorandum (pdf) reveals that such exemptions could be granted if “the relying party is a small business,” as defined in the Privacy Act.

Another example is when the the party “provides services, or access to services, solely online,” as well as in emergencies.

Safe and Voluntary: Senator Katy Gallagher

Labor’s Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has reassured citizens that digital ID is safe and voluntary. “Digital ID makes it safer and easier for Australians to prove who they are online,” she said in a statement on March 27.

Businesses will be able to sign up to the digital ID system within two years under amendments that passed the Senate.

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

COVID Vaccine Harms Now Appearing In Some Medical Journals

Albeit baby steps towards exposing outright lies and propaganda...

The Tide Turns: Research On COVID Vaccine Harms, Once A Taboo Subject, Now Appearing In Some Medical Journals

by Tyler Durden
May 14, 2024

Authored by Joe Wang via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

When COVID-19 took the world by storm in early 2020, I mostly relied on reading Nature Medicine, The Lancet, and a few other medical journals to learn the latest on this new disease.

In March 2020, I read an article published in Nature Medicine titled “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” with great interest. Written by California-based Scripps Institute’s Kristian Andersen and four other well-known professors, it said SARS-CoV-2 binds to human cells much better than any computer programs predicted, and concluded that “SARS-CoV-2 is not the product of purposeful manipulation.”

Having been a scientist with the world’s largest vaccine company for more than 10 years, I took issue with this claim.

In a May 2022 commentary titled “Pandemic Lessons Learned: Scientific Debate Silenced, With Deadly Consequences” I wrote: “If SARS-CoV-2 infects people better than your computer predicts, then the only conclusion you can draw is that your computer sucks. How did these world-renowned scientists get the basic logic so wrong? And how did the prestigious publication Nature Medicine not catch that? Did anyone even read the paper before publishing it, not to mention peer review it?”

The Andersen article’s conclusion, as it turned out, was a complete flip-flop on Andersen’s Jan. 31, 2020, email to Dr. Anthony Fauci, then the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), in which he wrote that “some of the features (potentially) look engineered,” referring to the coronavirus.

The Fauci emails were made public in June 2021 via Freedom of Information Act requests.

Nevertheless, the Nature Medicine paper became the authority on the origin of COVID. It essentially excluded the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and Dr. Fauci from any responsibility for the emergence of the virus. Any attempts to investigate or explore other possibilities were labelled conspiracy theories.

Andersen, and the article itself, were the subject of a U.S. Congressional Hearing by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic in June 2023. The debate on how COVID originated is still ongoing today.

The Lancet and the Daszak Statement

Andersen and Nature Medicine weren’t the only ones trying to please the CCP and Fauci.

On Feb. 18, 2020, The Lancet, another top medical journal, published a political statement with no science in it. It was organized by Peter Daszak from EcoHealth Alliance, which was the middleman for channeling Fauci’s National Institutes of Health (NIH) funds to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, according to a U.S. Congress report released on May 1 of this year.

The Daszak et al. statement dismissed as a conspiracy theory any suggestion that COVID was not of natural origin.

“We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” they wrote. “Conspiracy theories do nothing but create fear, rumours, and prejudice that jeopardize our global collaboration in the fight against this virus.”

The Tune Is Set

The Daszak statement, along with the Andersen article, set the tune for the officially accepted narrative. The narrative then expanded from “a natural origin of the virus” to “a COVID vaccine will flatten the curve and save the world.” Scientists, doctors, and journal editors who dared to challenge the narrative were cancelled and/or labelled conspiracy theorists and anti-vaxxers.

It has been four years and six months since the world first encountered SARS-CoV-2. Despite the claims by famous scientists like Fauci and Andersen, and despite the countless efforts by top virologists and public health professionals, evidence that the virus originated naturally has not been found.

More and more people now believe that the virus was leaked or escaped from a laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has been doing gain-of-function research on coronaviruses, and published such research in Nature Medicine in 2015, with NIH funding acknowledged.

The lab origin is no longer a conspiracy theory. The U.S. Energy Department and the FBI both now believe that the virus was more likely leaked from a lab than having developed naturally.

Encouraging Developments

Since the pandemic, The Epoch Times and NTD have been publishing documentary films on COVID origin and vaccine injuries. The first such documentary, Joshua Philipp’s “Tracking Down the Origin of the Wuhan Coronavirus,” was viewed over 100 million times on different platforms combined. However, such reports are rarely seen in other legacy media.

It has also been a taboo subject for scientific research and publication, but that may be starting to change.

Recently, I wrote a commentary about a new paper by five Japanese scientists that was published on Cureus, a peer-reviewed medical journal owned by the Springer Nature Group, the same company that owns Nature and Nature Medicine.

The scientists analyzed data collected from the entire 123 million Japanese population and concluded that the majority of the 115,799 excess deaths in 2022 was not due to COVID infection but rather vaccination, in particular the third COVID shot.

I was pleasantly surprised that a once-taboo subject was now published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, especially a member journal of the Springer Nature Group.

In another positive development, this month the International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (IJBM) published a paper titled “Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine: Friend or foe of cancer?” linking a key ingredient in the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine with cancer development.

IJBM is owned by the Dutch academic publishing company Elsevier, which also owns renowned publications like The Lancet, Cell, and ScienceDirect.

May the Force Be With the Editors-in-Chief

In the spring of 2022, when more scientists started to challenge the accepted narratives and seek the truth, I co-wrote the commentary “May the Force Be With Them: Scientists Fight Back.”

At that time, these brave scientists needed all the help they could get. For example, when a journal published a well-researched, well-written, and fact-based scientific paper on the safety concerns of the mRNA vaccines, the editor-in-chief of that journal was ousted.

The journal was Food and Chemical Toxicology, another Elsevier publication, and the editor-in-chief was Dr. José Luis Domingo.

Two years later, I’m optimistic that the IJBM editors-in-chief won’t face the same treatment as Dr. Domingo.

Why? I believe the tide has turned.

A recent New York Times article on COVID vaccine injuries is also an encouraging sign. It cites the Food and Drug Administration’s former acting commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock as saying the injuries are “serious” and “life-changing,” and “should be taken seriously.”

“I’m disappointed in myself,” she added. “I did a lot of things I feel very good about, but this is one of the few things I feel I just didn’t bring it home.”

Among the reported injured is the editor-in-chief of the journal Vaccine, Dr. Gregory Poland. He has been suffering from tinnitus since his first shot. The Centers for Disease Control didn’t take his report on his personal experience seriously. He told the NY Times that he did not “get any sense of movement (from the CDC).”

“If they have done studies (on vaccine injury), those studies should be published,” Dr. Poland added.

The journal Vaccine is also an Elsevier publication, and as the editor-in-chief, Dr. Poland is well positioned to offer his encouragement on vaccine injury studies.

Yes, I believe the tide has turned.

However, as of today, the Daszak statement is still on The Lancet website and the Andersen paper is still on Nature Medicine.

I wonder when the Lancet and Nature Medicine will have the courage to retract them? And when will these two eminent journals start publishing research on COVID vaccine injuries?

References:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/pandemic-lessons-learned-scientifi…

https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/new-email-reveals-what-fauci-knew…

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2021/tony-fauci-ema…

https://www.scripps.edu/news-and-events/press-room/2023/20230404-anders…

https://oversight.house.gov/release/wenstrup-to-hold-hearing-with-proxi…

https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2820%2930418-9

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2024.05.01-SSCP-…

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/expert-on-aluminum-toxicity-forced…

https://www.theepochtimes.com/author/aaron-kheriaty

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/editor-in-chief-of-renowned-scienc…

https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985

https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-origin-china-lab-leak-807b7b0a

https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/28/politics/wray-fbi-covid-origins-lab-chin…

https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv?utm_source=epochtv

https://www.ntd.com/

https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/the-unseen-crisis-vaccine-stories…

https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/documentary-tracking-down-the-ori…

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/joe-wang-japans-excess-deaths-hit-…

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012513/

Sunday, May 5, 2024

Coming ‘Wave’ of ‘Unprecedented Deaths’ Among Vaxxed

Bill Gates Insider Blows Whistle on Coming ‘Wave’ of ‘Unprecedented Deaths’ Among Vaxxed
Frank Bergman
May 4, 2024

A world-renowned scientist, who previously served as Bill Gates’s vaccine specialist, has blown the whistle to warn of a coming “wave of morbidity” and “mortality” among the Covid mRNA vaccinated.

Former Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation scientist and vaccine expert Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche has warned that populations around the world will soon experience a “completely unprecedented” plunge.

Bossche predicts that the death toll will be “up to 30-40% in highly vaccinated countries.”

The top scientists raised the alarm during an interview with vaccine expert and investigator Steve Kirsch.

He also notes that Covid is impossible to tackle with mRNA injections because it will always continue to mutate.

“The mutations are no longer restricted to spike protein, which indicates enhanced activity of CTLs (cytotoxic T cells) to diminish viral infectiousness,” Bossche explained Kirsch.

“And that CTL activity is responsible for the decline of T cells that in fact boost the neutralizing antibodies that prevent virulence.”

For this same reason, Bossche has previously warned that it was a mistake to roll out a vaccine for public use in the middle of a pandemic.

He notes that vaccinating large portions of the public will only make viruses stronger, rather than defeating them.

Bossche explained that waves of serious illness are increasing in developed, highly-vaccinated countries.

“Ultimately, this evolution would inevitably lead to the emergence of a highly virulent variant that would cause waves of hospitalizations and severe disease in highly vaccinated countries – of course, always the same, only in highly vaccinated countries,” Bossche stressed.

The expert then warned that these highly vaccinated countries will soon see “unprecedented” numbers of deaths.

“In my humble opinion, what we will see is something completely, completely unprecedented in terms of the magnitude of the wave of morbidity and unfortunately mortality that we will see,” he said.

Kirsch asked Bossche for specifics about what this “completely unprecedented” future phenomenon would entail.

He responded by predicting that over one-third of all people will die as a direct result of the Covid mRNA injection rollout.

“In some of the highly vaccinated populations … I would not be surprised that we will be dealing with serious decimation of the population, in some populations, maybe up to 30 or 40 percent,” Bossche commented.

“What we will see is completely unprecedented in terms of magnitude of the wave of morbidity and unfortunately mortality…up to 30-40% in highly vaccinated countries.” -Former Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation vaccine scientist @GVDBossche on VSRF LIVE. pic.twitter.com/tjQpdjy52q
    — Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (@VacSafety) December 15, 2023

Bossche has previously raised the alarm about a looming disaster facing the vaccinated, however.

As Slay News reported, Bossche warned the public during a separate interview that a “massive tsunami” of “chaos” and “death” is about to decimate the global Covid mRNA-vaccinated population.

Bossche warned that a “huge, huge wave” of illness and deaths among those vaccinated for Covid is now “imminent.”

The top scientist says this “massive tsunami” will collapse hospitals and cause financial, economic, and social “chaos.”

“What I am predicting is a massive, massive tsunami” of illness and death among highly-vaccinated populations with compromised immune systems, Bossche said.

“You will see what will happen, for example, in the next coming weeks…is more and more cases of more serious long Covid…

“They will start to replace the surge of the cancers…now we have a more chronic phase.

“It will end with a hyper-acute phase, a huge, huge wave…

“I’ve been studying this now for four years.

“I know what I’m talking about,” Bossche asserted.

“The thing I want your audience to understand, what we will be facing in the hyper-acute Covid crisis that is imminent, is that we will have to build a completely new world…” Bossche continues.

“It is very very clear that when this starts, our hospitals will collapse.

“And that means the chaos in all kinds of layers of society — financial, economic, social, you name it — will be complete.”

“And that is what I’m very clearly predicting…

“It’s very strange for me to make such statements, but I’m not hiding it because I’m two hundred percent convinced that it will happen,” he warned.

“This will be something that will be reported in history for many many generations to come,” he noted.

Bossche is not alone in his prediction of a major population plunge, however.

As Slay News reported earlier, Professor Dolores Cahill, a world-renowned immunology expert, issued an explosive warning to the public that everyone who has been vaccinated with Covid mRNA shots “will die within 3 to 5 years, even if they have had only one injection.”

Prof. Cahill has over 25 years of expertise in high-throughput protein array, antibody array, proteomics technology development, and automation.

Since the Covid mRNA shots were rolled out in early 2021, Cahill has been sounding the alarm about the devastating impact they will have on public health.

Not only does Cahill think the shots are dangerous, but she warns that they will eventually kill everybody who has received one or more doses.

During an interview, Cahill explains how mRNA in the injections harms all recipients and acts like a ticking time bomb in the Covid-vaccinated.

After explaining how the shots impact human health, Cahill made this following chilling prediction:

“Everybody who has an mRNA injection will die within 3 to 5 years, even if they have had only one injection.”