Monday, September 22, 2025

The American Dilemma

 The American Dilemma. Paul C. Roberts

The problem that  Americans face is that neither Republicans nor Democrats can represent their interest.

The Republicans represent Israel’s interest. The reason for this is that Republicans tend to be more conservative, more religious, and more patriotic than Democrats and are often seen by their opponents as jingoistic. The Republican mentality toward Israel comes from the “Judeo-Christian ethic” and the long Cold War against the Soviet Union.

The Judeo-Christian ethic is an oxymoron. God in the Old Testament is angry and vengeful. In the New Testament he is loving and forgiving. The “Judeo-Christian ethnic” is a propaganda term that disarms Christians from seeing Zionists for what they are.

During the Cold War of the 20th century, there was much focus on the Middle East. Washington was determined to minimize Soviet influence and to control oil flows. Israel was hyped as our ally, our base in the Arab Middle East against Soviet Communism. Thus, for conservatives, Israel is just part of America.  

Two consequences are that conservative Americans are blind to Zionist Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians and to the fake “war on terror” which in actual fact was Israel’s use of American lives and money against Israel’s opponents in the Middle East. Washington has spent the first quarter of the 21st century clearing away obstacles to Greater Israel.

The Democrats represent the interests of those who are alleged to be “oppressed by prudes and white racists.” Democrats are the defenders of immigrant-invaders who enter our country illegally. They champion “multiculturalism,” which is white replacement and a Tower of Babel. 

Democrats are the champions of sexual perverts. It is more important to a progressive, liberal, leftist Democrat that a male who declares himself a female have access to women’s spaces and athletic competitions than for a criminal suspect to have a fair trial. Democrats think that the most important civil right in the world is for biological males who self-declare themselves “transgendered” into females to take a woman’s place on a swim or soccer team and share the showers with the biological female members of the teams.  

The Democrats have no concern with the rights of the displaced real women to compete in sports. Similarly, Democrats are concerned with the sexual preference rights of “minor-directed persons” (pedophiles), not with the sexual abuse of children. Have you not noticed how vehement the Democrat progressive liberal left is in defending the rights of sexual perverts? Indeed, you are not even allowed to use such a term as sexual perverts, because  sexual perversions have been normalized by the Democrat liberal left. It is entirely possible that the Democrats will criminalize heterosexual sex, because it produces more “aversive racists,” thus perpetuating white racism. Yes, laugh, but the prospect has already been explored in science fiction.

The consequence of the two parties’ indoctrinated biases is that it is impossible for either to represent the values and interests of the ethnic base of America. By supporting whatever crime Israel commits, Republicans maintain their pro-Israel base at the expense of the moral values of their base. Even red states such as Texas and Florida will not give you a state contract or job if you criticize or boycott Israel.

The Democrats, committed as they are to white replacement as all whites are aversive racists, refuse to protect American borders from immigrant-invaders. Democrats are committed to emptying citizenship from meaning.

What is the result of the inability of either party to represent Americans?

If Republicans are in office, it means wars for Israel.

If Democrats are in office, it means open borders and wars against the family, wars against real Christianity not the fake Christian Zionist variety created by Israel, wars against normal heterosexuality, wars against merit and, thereby, the destruction of educational standards, and advancement based on skin color and perverse sexuality. For the Biden regime the ideal candidate was a black transgendered. Biden’s black Secretary of Defense announced that there would be no promotion of white heterosexual males until “equity had been attained.”

Elon Musk was correct when he said that America needs a new political party, one independent of economic, foreign, and ideological interests. But Musk did not say who would finance it. It would take Musk’s entire wealth.  

The combination of the corrupt US Supreme Court ruling that it is legal for corporations to purchase the US government with campaign contributions and the stupidity of the annual subsidy of billions of US dollars to Israel, which is used by Israel to purchase the House of Representatives, the US Senate, the President and the  administration, make it abundantly clear that Americans have a government that is totally incapable of representing Americans.

Throughout the Western World it is not democracy that rules. The Western World is ruled by vested interests whose campaign contributions determine policy. When Putin and Lavrov negotiate with Washington officials, they are not negotiating with a government. They are negotiating with representatives of the private interests whose money places Representatives, Senators, and Presidents in office.  

The two most powerful vested interests in America are the US military/security complex and the Israel Lobby. As they share the interest in war and its profits in terms of money and territory, peace faces a powerful counterforce as peace does not serve the interests of the two most powerful interest groups in the United States.

One wonders if Putin, Lavrov, Xi, and the Iranians will wake up one day and be capable of recognizing reality.

Supporters, Friends, Readers, the situation is worse than I describe above. Here is some of the evidence from this morning alone of Western collapse following the destruction of its beliefs:

The Satanic British Prime Minister Said the British Flag Represents “Diversity,” Not Ethnic British People

The Evil Starmer Declared the Ethnic British people “Divisive” for Protesting the Overrunning of their Country and Mass Rape of their Women.  

Starmer alleges that it is Ethnic British who cause violence, not immigrant-invaders.

It is extraordinary that the British people elected an anti-British Prime Minister. But maybe it is not. The Americans elected two anti-American presidents, Obama and Biden, and are almost certain to elect another once Trump is gone. 

Every day it becomes more clear that there is not enough self-belief in the West for the civilization to survive. All white ethnic peoples are being submerged in Multiculturalism. A Tower of Babel has replaced ethnic nationality.  Restorative leaders such as Charlie Kirk are simply shot down. Others are “cancelled” and disposed of via censorship, firings, and threats. The British prime minister has now aligned the British government with immigrant-invaders and declared the British government to be in opposition to the ethnic British people.  

The Western World is over and done with. The West’s last contribution to humanity will be nuclear war.

See this.

*

Satanic German Soccer Team Interrogates Star Black Midfielder for Expressing Sympathy to Charlie Kirk’s Family

Under pressure Felix Nmecha deleted what he wrote: “Celebrating the murder of a husband and a father of two, a man who peacefully stood up for his beliefs and values, is really evil and shows how much we really need Jesus Christ.”

Germans objected, which shows how lost to Satan the Western World is.

Nmecha possibly faces “millions of dollars in penalties for social media posts violating the club’s values.” Amazing, a member of a German football team faces millions of dollars in penalties for expressing sympathy for an assassinated man’s family.  Nmecha should find another team and another country.  Clearly a man of God does not belong in Germany.

See this.

*

Trump files $15 billion lawsuit against New York Times

The NY Times is “the worst and most degenerate newspaper in the history of our country, a mouthpiece for the Radical Left Democrat Party”– Trump

Trump is correct. The Democrats are cheering Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Makes you wonder if they did it.

The Democrats are an anti-American party. Democrats are the party of immigrant-invaders, sexual perversion, Antifa/BLM violence, and suppression of free speech. America is doomed, because almost half of the American population agrees with the Democrats. Notice that it is the most educated states that are the most anti-American. It was the universities that destroyed the belief system.

See this.

*

“We know where you live” violent Democrats threaten Trump voters

See this.

*

Paul Craig Roberts is a renowned author and academic, chairman of The Institute for Political Economy where this article was originally published. Dr. Roberts was previously associate editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal. He was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy during the Reagan Administration. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.

Thursday, September 18, 2025

Ruthless globalist scheme to silence dissent

Behind the UN, the WHO and the WEF hides a ruthless globalist scheme designed to silence dissent, gag online platforms, strangle inconvenient narratives, and manipulate elections.

And it’s already happening. The recent assassination of Charlie Kirk in the United States was the most brutal warning yet: if you dare to defend life, family, and freedom, you will be marked. And he is not alone.

People around the world are in shock over the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk during a talk at the University of Utah.

Charlie was a fearless defender of life, family, and freedom, a man who spoke the truth when others stayed silent. His murder is more than a tragedy. It is a warning: refuse to bow to the system’s lies, and they will jail you — or kill you.

What they did to Charlie is not just an attack on him. It’s an attack on all of us, because he stood for what you and I believe. This is not politics as usual; it is a war on truth. And if it can happen to Charlie, it can happen to any one of us.

This is the world the global elites are building: dissent branded as “hate speech,” democracy chained, elections manipulated, freedom reduced to whatever the authorities allow. Already your voice is being erased — your social media shut down, your choices banned, your beliefs mocked.

This isn’t a nightmare. It’s the blueprint being advanced by the UN, the EU, the OAS, and every globalist body determined to silence opposition.

Charlie is not the first victim, only the most recent, and the most tragic:

The list of victims keeps growing:

Romania: Călin Georgescu, the top candidate for president, was disqualified after winning the first round of elections, Diana Șoșoacă was barred from the ballot, and conservative George Simion lost an election riddled with irregularities — but Brussels said nothing.

Brazil: Presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro and his son had their bank accounts frozen, their access to social media blocked, and their voices silenced — an operation led by the scared, radical Leftist President Lula and cheered on by the UN and OAS to wipe out pro-life opposition.

France, Spain, Germany: Leaders and parties like France’s Marine Le Pen, Spain’s Vox party, and Germany’s AfD party are constantly smeared, censored, surveilled, or threatened with bans — despite millions of citizens supporting them.

United States: Donald Trump was dragged through endless politically motivated court cases designed to block his comeback and silence his voters.

In Australia, the Senate formally censured conservative Senator Ralph Babet over his social-media speech, a government-backed punishment aimed squarely at a sitting opposition political figure.

In the United Kingdom, Nigel Farage’s bank closed his accounts in express retaliation against his values, while David Campanale was expelled from his party for his Christian faith.

In Poland, CitizenGO’s Facebook page was shut down right before national elections after it went viral and exposed a radical globalist candidate’s agenda.

These are just a few examples… Meanwhile, international actors backed by the EU and the UN are forcing Big Tech to erase anything they call “misinformation” or “hate speech.” But you and I know the truth: it’s just code for silencing YOU.

And they’re not even hiding it anymore. The UN’s Pact for the Future, Digital IDs, AI-control schemes, the Digital Euro and EU chat control, the EU’s “Democracy Shield,” Australia's over-zealous e-Safety Commissioner and her social media takedown orders, and censorship laws dressed up as “public safety” — every one of these is another link in the chains of total ideological control.

This is the most dangerous threat we face: a future with no alternative to woke globalism, no space for conscience or belief, and no escape from state control — even over your money… Unless we act now.

The elites are creating the chains of oppression and censorship one link at a time. To fight back, you and I must break the chains link by link.

If it can happen to politician — or even to someone like Charlie Kirk— it can happen to you.

Today, anyone who defends life, family, or Western Christian values, anyone who dares to question Agenda 2030 or reject gender ideology, risks punishment: legal, financial, even physical.

And this is no accident. These attacks are part of a larger strategy.

If the globalists succeed, democracy itself will be bound in chains of oppression, censorship, and control. Decisions will be made in faraway offices by unelected bureaucrats about which candidates are “suitable” for office, which policies are “agreed” on in Parliament, or which voices are “acceptable” to permit online.

They will decide what you can read, watch, or publish — always under the excuse of “safety” and “protection.” Even your family’s rights won’t be safe, as foreign bureaucrats dictate how you must raise your children.

This is the fight we’re in:

If you defend life or family… you’re branded an extremist.
If you question the climate cult… you’re smeared as “dangerous.”
If you resist the EU, UN, or OAS power-grabs… you’re erased.
And if you are a Christian… then you are mocked, ridiculed, and pushed out of the public debate.

They’ve built a full-scale, coordinated censorship machine, and it has nothing to do with protecting democracy. Quite the opposite.

They claim the power to define what is “truth” and what is “disinformation.”

They erase the voices they despise: Christian voices, pro-life voices, voices defending children from sexual exploitation… and yes, YOUR voice.

And sometimes, as we saw with Charlie Kirk, erasing a voice means going beyond censorship… it means silencing it forever.

Are you willing to live with that?

Are you willing to accept manipulated elections, silenced beliefs, and erased political rivals?

Of course, NOT.

~Rocío D’Angelo and the entire CitizenGO team

Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Facebook's Secret Experiment Manipulated 700,000 Users

Rogan Guest Reveals Facebook's Secret Experiment That Manipulated 700,000 Users
by Tyler Durden
May 17, 2025

Via https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/joe-rogan-guest-reveals-facebooks

Joe Rogan sat down with Harvard professor and mind control expert Rebecca Lemov, and it didn’t take long for the conversation to dive into one of his favorite topics: government interference in our digital lives.

Rogan opened the conversation by saying, “There are so many different kinds of mind control.”

“One of the things we’ve talked about a lot on this podcast is, that an enormous percentage of what you’re seeing on social media in terms of interactions and debate is not real. It’s not organic,” he explained.

“It’s state-run and state-funded, and it’s whether it’s foreign governments or our government or even corporations, you’re getting inorganic discourse that’s designed to form a narrative and which is a form of mind control,” he added.

Lemov picked up on that point and took it further. Even when people know something is fake, she explained, our brains still react as if it were real.

“Yeah. I mean, I think even on a basic level, people, it’s known and studies have shown that we respond as if it were organic and real,” she said.

“Even when somebody likes a post of yours, the response is the same as, like, in-person interaction,” she added.

It’s not just governments pulling the strings, she warned. The platforms themselves are designed to influence how we feel.

“I think at the root, there is a kind of way that, on an emotional level, it’s not just manipulation of ideas,” she said, “but there’s a kind of emotional engineering that’s built into the platforms and doesn’t even demand, you know, at first, government involvement.”

    Joe Rogan’s conversation with Harvard professor and mind control expert Rebecca Lemov quickly zeroed in on one of his favorite topics: government interference in digital life.

    Rogan opened the door with a warning that’s become all too familiar.

    “Well, there’s so many different… pic.twitter.com/XLqekbJL74    — The Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) May 15, 2025

Lemov peeled back the curtain on DARPA, the government’s controversial defense research agency, and its hidden role in shaping the digital world we now live in.

DARPA, she revealed, wasn’t just involved in building the internet—it may have helped lay the foundation for emotional manipulation on a global scale.

“DARPA was involved in the development of the internet and of things like pattern recognition,” she said. “The government has funded many, many studies.”

But what concerned her most wasn’t just the technology — it was how that technology is being used.

“What I got interested in, in social media and how I connect it with the episodes of brainwashing—it creates states of emotional contagion that aren’t really about convincing people of a different way to think,” she explained.

She continued, “But more about how you feel about what you think.”

That emotional shift, she said, mirrors the exact tactics used in cults.

“It’s not that it changed my thoughts,” she said. “It’s how I felt about those thoughts.”

    Lemov peeled back the curtain on DARPA — the government’s controversial defense research agency — and its role in shaping the digital world we now live in.

    DARPA, she revealed, wasn’t just involved in building the internet. It may have laid the groundwork for emotional manipulation… pic.twitter.com/C3HvnZ6a67    — The Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) May 15, 2025

That’s when Lemov dropped one of the darkest revelations in Big Tech history—a secret Facebook experiment that quietly manipulated the emotions of nearly 700,000 users.

And the users had no idea it was happening.

“There’s a famous Facebook experiment I read about that took place in 2012 and was published in 2014, where they announce that they’ve achieved, mass emotional contagion at scale,” Lemov told Rogan.

She explained how Facebook altered people’s newsfeeds without their knowledge or consent.

“Whenever you go on the platform, you agree to be tested or AB testing. So this experiment exposed a group to a more — their newsfeed was altered in a negative direction emotionally, as measured by word counting software,” she said.

The results, she added, were deeply unsettling.

“And they discovered that that group that had a negative exposure also responded in a more negative way, as judged through their posts and likes and responses.”

“The group that was exposed to a more positive newsfeed by altering the algorithm then had also a measurably statistically significant effect of more positive emotional response — and the control group was unaltered by this.”

In other words, Facebook wasn’t just studying emotions — they were actively shaping them.

And no one was ever warned.

    That’s when Lemov exposed one of the darkest secrets in Big Tech history — a sinister Facebook experiment that quietly tampered with the emotions of 700,000 users.

    And they never even knew it.

    “There’s a famous Facebook experiment I read about that took place in 2012 and was… pic.twitter.com/LLQVXh2IV5   — The Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) May 15, 2025

The full scope of the experiment didn’t come to light until two years later, when researchers finally admitted what they had done.

Facebook’s data scientists had quietly manipulated the feeds of 689,003 users — removing either all the positive posts or all the negative ones to observe the emotional fallout.

If your newsfeed felt unusually bleak or suspiciously upbeat in January 2012, there’s a chance you were part of it — and never knew.

The team behind the study, led by data scientist Adam Kramer, eventually published their findings in a scientific journal and spelled out the results in cold, clinical detail:

“When positive expressions were reduced, people produced fewer positive posts and more negative posts; when negative expressions were reduced, the opposite pattern occurred,” the paper said.

It was undeniable proof: emotions are contagious — and social media could be weaponized to manipulate mood at scale.

The experiment lasted just one week, but for those caught in the algorithm’s net, the emotional ripple effects may have lingered far longer.

Things took a disturbing turn after Lemov explained that when the experiment was finally made public, the backlash was immediate — and in some cases, heartbreaking.

She recalled one particularly chilling response from a user who reached out directly to the research team.

“And on the Facebook page of the research group that did the experiment, at least one user wrote in saying, ‘Could I ever find out if I was in that experiment? Because I was in the emergency room at that time with, you know, threatening to commit suicide, and I want to know if my feed was altered and maybe that pushed me over into that state.”

But there was no way to trace it.

“Of course, they could never know, and it can’t be traced backwards. And other people had a similar response,” Lemov said.

The revelations were serious enough to spark an investigation by the British government, which considered sanctions due to the international reach of the experiment.

“And there was even an investigation by the British government about whether this should be sanctioned because it affected users internationally,” she added.

But in the end, no one was held accountable.

“Ultimately, there doesn’t seem to have been any sanctions that came out of in anyone associated with it,” she said.

No punishment. No warnings. No transparency.

And the question still hangs in the air: how many more experiments are happening right now, hidden in plain sight?

    But here’s where it gets truly disturbing.

    Lemov revealed that when the experiment finally came to light, the backlash was swift—and in some cases, tragic.

    “But, so this is why there was an ethical debate when the experiment was published in 2014,” she said.

    One user, Lemov… pic.twitter.com/l96zLAlOTc    — The Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) May 15, 2025

Watch the full conversation below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDkHCaNAo_w

EU institutes ‘Orwellian censorship’

The bloc’s online content-moderation policies violate free speech, according to the agency 

US State Dept accuses EU of ‘Orwellian censorship’
23 Jul, 2025

The EU’s online content regulations are an affront to free speech, the US State Department has said in response to France’s praise for the Digital Services Act (DSA).

The State Department echoed earlier criticism from US Vice President J.D. Vance, who accused EU member states of attempting to quash dissenting voices and stigmatize popular right-wing parties such as the Alternative for Germany (AfD).

“In Europe, thousands are being convicted for the crime of criticizing their own governments. This Orwellian message won’t fool the United States. Censorship is not freedom,” the State Department wrote on X on Tuesday. “All the DSA protects is European leaders from their own people.”

Earlier this month, France’s mission to the UN promoted the DSA on X, stating, “In Europe, one is free to speak, not free to spread illegal content.”

Passed in 2022, the DSA mandates that online platforms remove “illegal and harmful” content and combat “the spread of disinformation,” according to the European Commission. Critics in both the US and Europe have likened the regulations to the creation of a ‘ministry of truth’.

Earlier this year, prosecutors in Paris launched an investigation into Elon Musk’s platform X, on suspicion that it was being used to meddle in French politics and spread hateful messages. The company dismissed the probe as “politically motivated.”

In 2024, the French authorities detained Russian-born tech entrepreneur Pavel Durov on charges that he had allowed his Telegram messaging app to be used for criminal activities.

Durov, who was later released on bail, denied any wrongdoing and accused France of waging “a crusade” against free speech. He also claimed that French intelligence officials attempted to pressure him into censoring content during Romania’s 2024 presidential election.

France’s foreign intelligence agency, the DGSE, confirmed that it had “reminded” Durov of his responsibility to police content, but denied allegations of election interference.