Trump Is Bombing Yemen For Israel

Trump Is Bombing Yemen For Israel
Caitlin Johnstone
Mar 17, 2025
    

The US is bombing Yemen again after Houthi leaders announced that their blockade on Israeli shipping would resume due to Israel’s siege on Gaza.

Trump could have used Washington’s immense leverage over Israel to force Netanyahu to honor the ceasefire agreement and allow aid into Gaza. Instead he let the IDF lay siege to Gaza and started bombing Yemen for Israel, because he’s a warmongering Israel cuck.

Trump is bombing Yemen for Israel, rushing weapons to Israel despite its flagrant ceasefire violations, and rolling out authoritarian measure after authoritarian measure to stop Americans from criticizing Israel. Because that’s what you get when you vote for America First.

Do you want to know how much of a pathetic Israel lackey Trump is? Earlier this month his nominated hostage envoy Adam Boehler went on CNN and proclaimed that the United States is “not an agent of Israel”. Days later, the White House withdrew Boehler’s nomination.

Known things:

1. Trump is a servant of Israel.

2. Trump is on the Epstein flight logs.

3. Epstein worked with Israeli intelligence.

4. Epstein was running a sexual blackmail operation.

5. Trump is obstructing the release of the Epstein files.

Question:

Exactly how many kids did Trump rape?

It’s cool how Republicans are finally dropping that phony “We’re populists fighting the Deep State” schtick and returning to their authentic “Anyone who opposes authoritarianism loves terrorists, let’s fight more wars in the middle east” roots.

Trump supporters would wipe their asses with the US Constitution and deport their own mothers if doing so would help their government send one more 2000-pound bomb to Israel.

The other day I shared a report about Israel continuing its insanely evil practice of murdering children in Gaza with sniper drones, and I got multiple people in my replies commenting “Release the hostages!” as a response.

Israel supporters are the worst people in the world.

I have no sympathy for Israelis, nor for Israel supporters who say they “feel unsafe”. This isn’t because I am uncaring, it’s because I know any sympathy I might point in that direction will be harnessed and used to murder Palestinians, start wars, and destroy free speech rights.

When you proclaim that anti-Zionism is antisemitism and then Zionism murders tens of thousands of children, you are naturally going to see a rise in “antisemitism” as you have defined it. That’s all this whole “antisemitism crisis” narrative has been from the very beginning.

Zionism is not a religion, it’s a fucking political ideology. It’s always legitimate to criticize a political ideology. Saying it’s evil forbidden speech to express disdain for Zionism is the same as saying it’s evil forbidden speech to express disdain for white nationalism. Zionism is the political ideology which supports the west’s decision to drop an apartheid ethnostate on top of a pre-existing population and maintain that apartheid ethnostate by any amount of violence and abuse necessary.

You can’t butcher children by the tens of thousands with the backing of the most powerful war machine on the planet in the name of supporting this political ideology and then legitimately cry victim when people have something to say about it. That’s not a thing.

People tend to bluff the opposite of whatever hand they’re holding; newbies do it in poker, and everyone does it with their ego. Conservatives are afraid of everything, so they posture as hypermasculine tough guys. Liberals are bootlickers who act like heroes of social justice.

You see this dynamic everywhere, on the personal level as well as political. The person who feels small acts big. The person who feels dumb acts like a know it all. You see some bloke acting like he’s better than everyone else and think “That guy needs to be brought down a few pegs,” but really he’s only doing that because he feels inferior to everybody; you can’t bring him down any lower than he’s already brought himself. They’re all just bluffing the opposite of the hand they believe they’ve been dealt.

Romanian right-wing leader barred from presidential election

 And who has a functioning «democracy» nowadays?

Unelected judges deciding who can run, which is also happening in other countries definitely is not democratic. But this is as intended from the get go, to try to favor the established parties. US States legislations heavily favour the two established parties and put extremely high technical barriers for all the other parties to run candidates. Plus the ethos in the US, with

politics being like a religion, you are blue or red, like in Byzantium/Cosntantinopole you were green or blue, nothing else is allowed.

As a Romanian I am appalled at what is happening there, the crassness and impunity and shamelesness, which is all supported and encouraged from Brussells, and looked over by the US.

But this doesn’t mean Romania is a special case. It just a case of more acute fever, and a society where wealth is not as great at personal levels as in western Europe. Also, in Romania there are still a great percentage of people living in the country side that can still get by with what they can produce in terms of food, and even working in one of the romance speaking countries of EU, and ultimately not giving a fuck on the corruption.


Last thing on Earth European leaders want is an actual democratic State based in Liberty via Natural Rights. The long tragic history of Europe is millennia of monarchs and autocrats and feudalism and endless wars and terror without end. Those European «leaders» caused the deaths (by warfare) of well over a hundred million people in the 20th Century alone. The US needs to exit NATO and let the European savages get back to murdering one another on an industrial scale.


No further proof required to confirm that if you cannot control your candidates whether they are classified Left or Right, then the most obvious answer is to bar them from electoral procedure. This is a classy example we live under an EU Oligarchy with dictatorial Powers to do as it pleases to oppress the People they falsely claim to protect and respect.


What country only allows the electorate to vote for pro western politicians and ban any opposite who do not support this view. Can you image the outcome if a country like Georgia said you could only vote for a far right politician or someone who was pro Russia and any alternative politician who was pro west was banned.


EU is anti democracy. They are an aggressive godless totalitarian organization .


Mrs. Diana is to be commended for her courage to take a stand and speak against the many abuses of the system. Yet her most obvious flaw is that she shouts most of the times when speaking on different topics. But I don’t blame her for that, it’s not an easy thing to be in her shoes. I appreciate she did not drag Mr. Georgescu’s name in the mud, it would not help her win hearts and minds here but to the contrary. Mr. Georgescu is a visionary and a true patriot. He spoke his (our) truth with courage and determination which costs him dearly yet he was willing to pay the price.
So, what’s to be learned by Russia from all of the recent turmoil in the EU but especially in Eastern Europe? That all great powers need spheres of influence and buffer zones when dealing with other great powers. The fact that some Eastern European states are mostly Christian Orthodox should motivate Russia to see those countries as potentially long time, dependable allies, no matter how the political winds are blowing at this very moment. Russia has lost a lot of influence over Eastern Europe because of all the troubled times of the 90s, yet now it has another chance to win hearts and minds and that would be a true, lasting victory. Thus, I see Ukraine, Georgia, Armenia, Moldova, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Serbia, North Macedonia as long time, natural allies. Other countries may be interest-based, circumstantial allies but the natural ones will always be there, once the kindred spirit is once again awakened and nurtured. It may take a while to get there but it is well worth trying. For I guess all the people of Eastern Europe are deeply disappointed and dissatisfied with the «values» and «prosperity» EU bureaucrats brought to them. These being said, perhaps Victoria Nuland’s statement of «F..ck the EU» can be seen in a whole new light.


The EU was a great idea built on travel free and right to work for all Europeans. Suddenly it turned into a giant dictatorship entity giving orders and manipulating events from Brusselstan. Disgusting!


The EU turned into a glorified loan shark, then into a dictatorship.


This is what democracy looks like. Solzhenitsyn warned America nearly 50 years ago that the US is taking all the necessary steps to become the Soviet Union. Romania can only choose pre-approved leaders designated to be OK by the Rothchilds who control the money. Now, hand over your rare earth minerals.

What the hell is happening in Romania? Everyone who is not a neo-liberal pro-EU shill is being disqualified. Welcome to EUropean democracy! Romanians need to end this nonsense on the streets. Let’s see a REAL Maidan of the people for once.

Romanian right-wing leader barred from presidential election
Diana Iovanovici-Sosoaca has accused Brussels and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen of hindering democratic processes in her country
15 Mar, 2025

Romania’s electoral authority has rejected right-wing politician Diana Iovanovici-Sosoaca’s bid to run in the country’s upcoming presidential election. The decision, announced Saturday, marks the second time the politician has been barred from the race.

Sosoaca, a former lawyer and MEP for the nationalist S.O.S. Romania party, was disqualified from last year’s annulled election after the country’s Constitutional Court ruled that her anti-Western rhetoric and support for closer ties with Russia violated Romania’s democratic framework. The politician, however, filed a new bid with the Central Electoral Bureau on Thursday, arriving at the headquarters wearing boxing gloves and vowing to “fight the system,” which she has long accused of being undemocratic and dictatorial.

According to local media, the election bureau cited the Constitutional Court’s 2024 ruling in its decision to reject Sosoaca’s new bid, with ten members voting against her candidacy and only three in favor. Following the decision, Sosoaca declared that she had once again proven Romania “doesn’t have democracy” and vowed to continue her political fight.

Speaking to RT on Thursday, Sosoaca accused the European Commission and its president, Ursula von der Leyen, of orchestrating her previous removal from the race. “Ursula von der Leyen has Romanian politicians in her hand and orders them what decisions to make,” she stated, slamming the commission president as “the main opponent of sovereignty in Romania, as well as all other countries in Europe.”

Sosoaca, who calls herself a “sovereignist” fighting for Romania’s future, blames the economic problems in the country on Brussels’ policies, especially with regard to Russia, and calls the EU a “dictatorship.”

“Romania needs a negotiator who will take our country out of the EU’s losing logic,” she said, adding that EU policies, including sanctions against Russia, had “bankrupted its own economy” and caused unnecessary conflict, with “all European countries paying for this stupidity.”

Sosoaca has until midnight on Saturday to appeal the decision. The first round of the election, a rerun after last November’s vote was annulled, is scheduled for May 4. So far, 14 candidates have applied to run, four of whom – including the first-round winner in the annulled vote and another staunch NATO and EU critic, Calin Georgescu – have been rejected.

Georgescu won the first round of last November’s election, but the Constitutional Court overturned the result amid allegations of electoral violations and claims that Russia had run an online campaign to promote him. Moscow denied any involvement in Romania’s electoral process. An investigation earlier this year revealed that the irregularities may have stemmed from a consulting firm linked to the pro-Western National Liberal Party, which allegedly sought to derail another candidate but inadvertently boosted Georgescu instead.

MI6 chief told Boris Johnson covid was a biological weapon

Former MI6 chief told Boris Johnson covid was a biological weapon; Patrick Vallance helped orchestrate the cover-up
By Rhoda Wilson on March 17, 2025

Five years ago, former MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove informed the then Prime Minister Boris Johnson that “it is now beyond reasonable doubt that covid-19 was engineered in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”  But Johnson covered this up on the advice of Patrick Vallance, the then chief scientific advisor.

On 9 March the Mail on Sunday reported that virologist Robert Redfield was now “100 per cent” convinced that covid-19 was the result of scientists becoming infected while carrying out high-risk experiments to boost the infectivity of bat viruses.

In a commentary yesterday, the Mail on Sunday went further and wrote that “a highly distinguished source” had said that in the early days of the covid era, former MI6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove informed the then Prime Minister Boris Johnson, that “it is now beyond reasonable doubt that covid-19 was engineered in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Sir Richard’s warning to Johnson was based on work by a reputable scientific team but he faced opposition.  Patrick Vallance, who was then at the heart of the Government’s scientific team, was reportedly reluctant to accept the lab leak theory.

Johnson himself was puzzled by the reluctance of some British scientists to consider the lab leak theory and asked the intelligence agencies to do more work on the origins of covid but his efforts were met with resistance from the scientific community.

The refusal of government experts to contemplate the lab leak theory has raised questions about whether the public and the then premier were actively misled by the scientific and intelligence community to protect research funding from Beijing and avoid angering the Chinese government.

Vallance has been promoted since the covid era; he was a “Sir” and is now a “Lord,” he was a government advisor and is now the Minister for Science in Keir Starmer’s government. The time has come for Vallance to address these issues on behalf of the current government and provide clarity on why he and other scientists were so unwilling to consider the possibility that the virus originated in a Chinese laboratory, the commentary in the Mail on Sunday concluded.

In the video below, Andre Walker discusses the Mail on Sunday’s latest revelations.

The virus was engineered. “That means it’s not just a leak it’s [ ] a biological weapon,” Walker said.  “I’m going to go further than the Mail on Sunday. I’m going to say that I believe that we have been the victim of a biological attack by the People’s Republic of China. I believe it’s an act of war.”

He then lists what he believes needs to be done in the name of justice and to stop the perpetrators from inflicting another “pandemic” on the world: “The Chinese Communist Party now owes the world £12 trillion … We want President Xi Jinping put on trial … Everyone who works at the Wuhan laboratory [should be put on trial] … Fauci and Vallance should go to prison, Dr. Tedros [should be given the] death penalty.”

Evil EU approves self-replicating RNA COVID vaccine

Evil EU approves self-replicating RNA COVID vaccine
Jon Rappoport
Mar 13, 2025
        
The first type of RNA kill shot wasn’t enough.

So the European Union just approved something worse.

This is the way it looks from their point of view. The RNA forces cells of the body to produce a spike protein. With this new version, the body is also forced to make new RNA, which in turn forces the body to make more spike protein. And so on and so forth. Sounds like eternal vaccination. Sounds like continuously stimulating the immune system to react—wearing it out, or causing it to go into dangerous overdrive. Or both.

Naturally, there are no long-term studies on safety.

From my point of view, as you know, there is no convincing evidence that the shot makes the body produce this spike protein in the first place. Because no large-scale test has ever been done.

The entire purpose of the vaccine is getting the body to make that protein. For several billion people. So you’d think the WHO or the CDC or SOMEBODY would line up 100,000 people who had received the vaccine and see whether they had that protein in their cells. This is called science.

But no. Never been done. Won’t be done.

My position on this diabolical self-replicating RNA vaccine is simple:...