Democracy
By Patrick Pappano
Dec 23, 2023
The Abraham Accords are bilateral agreements on Arab–Israeli normalization signed between Israel and the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain on September 15, 2020.[1][2] Mediated by the United States, the initial announcement of August 13, 2020, concerned only Israel and the United Arab Emirates before the announcement of a follow-up agreement between Israel and Bahrain on September 11, 2020.
I have just read, for the umpteenth time, that Israel is the only Democracy in the Mideast. This is served up to the American people as a testament to the worthiness of Israel and a backhanded approval of Democracy as the only default political system of merit. Of course, most people, educated people, can see that what Israel’s Democracy means for its Palestinian complement: utter destruction.
Of course, Palestinians are not citizens of Israel so not subject to its government, by law, but subject to its government by necessity, they occupy a land that is theirs by general acknowledgement, but in dispute by Israel. One wonders under what law Palestinians live, but whatever it is, it decidedly is not a law that sanctions its own destruction. No, the Palestinians are most affected by Israeli and as it turns out, U.S.A. “Democracy;” we support Israel. The ”We” being our national government.
First, just to be clear, it is my belief that the Istraelis are in no way connected to the original Israelites who received from God their grant of land, as long as they behaved. The original Israelites did not behave and were, apparently, thus dispersed. But, according to the Bible, the only authority we have, God said in dispersing them, that He would write his law upon their hearts. And as there is no further word on these people, these Israelites. Some have come regard them as the Cimmerians who then became the Scythians and then all manner of Europeans, the Celts, the Angles, the Saxons, the Iberians and in general, Europa. And then the Europeans made us. This progression of European humanity is attested to by two most honorable gentlemen, to my mind, Charles A. Wiseman and Bertrand Comparet. But this paper is about Democracy and not about Israel.
Although the term “Civilization” may be applied to what Europeans wrought, I will make the point that all manner of uncivilized peoples, like the present day “Israelis,” claim to be part, if not an integral part, of that fraction of humanity that created conditions that are generally described as “Civilization.” It is a white human thing, a European thing, although those labels are in today’s parlance, verboten. It is not right to admire the work of a people who are homogenous and worse, t0 point to their homogeneity as having anything to do with their work. All men are created equal, remember.
But the core concept I wish to impart, is that “Civilization,” as agreed to by all as being a good thing, came into being by very undemocratic means. Kings, like Clovis of the Franks, in the vacuum created by the fall of the Roman Empire, decided he had a better idea, and using persuasion and force, created the Kingdom of the Franks. Then seeing that there were some dimensions of human life he had no answers to, allied with the Roman Catholic Church, to herd the people, his people, into a holy life or a lifeway compatible with Christian teaching. This alliance was put into place with some force.
Clovis and his men, reminiscent of the Biblical David and his men, raided a city and came away with the local Bishop‘s vase of Soissons. The Bishop appealed to Clovis to keep what they took, but to return the vase, and accordingly Clovis went to his men to collect the vase from their booty, after all, it meant very little to them, they had much other booty to divide. But as Clovis was retrieving the vase, one of his soldiers took offence and smashed the vase with his battle ax. Later, when Clovis’ soldiery were lined up for review, as Clovis came down the line, he came to the disobedient soldier and knocked his battle ax out of his hand. As the soldier bent over to pick up the ax, Clovis dealt him a death blow saying: “Thus you did to the vase of Soissons!” I guess as king you can mete out rough justice. In any case, the Bishop did not get his vase back, but did ally with Clovis in creating the first European civilization after the fall of Rome. A civilization of laws that included Christian law.
There is no other credible explanation for the Kingdom of the Franks, it was created by King Clovis. And there were kings in those days, and each had a kingdom. This also was the time of Arthur, king of the Britons, an apocryphal figure that was quickly taken up as legend and a champion of his people, who with his knights of the roundtable, defeated the dreaded Saxons. This is how nations were made, and Christian nations too, that had a hierarchy of kings, God on high and his Earthly kings who served by divine right, as did Moses.
If you follow the story of Moses, you learn that he was a reluctant leader, proffering his older, more eloquent brother in his place. But God would have none of it, Moses be The Man. And as it turned out, it was a good choice. As Chief Priest Aaron served well, but as a king, not a good choice. Not a good choice perhaps because he lacked force. Moses has already displayed force when he killed an Egyptian who was acting harshly against one of Moses’ own people. This was mirrored when Clovis struck down the disobedient soldier. Both Moses and Clovis were capable of force, but only in the pursuit of justice. Justice, that litmus test of civilization and a successful nation-state. And after all, the key parameter of government is the prerogative of force to achieve justice. This is what Moses exhibits in leading the Israelites.
Early America was part of the Kingdom of England, but a flawed kingdom that had been usurped in place by the Amsterdam Jews who took out the last king of England, who ruled by Divine Right: Charles I, a Stuart.
After the death of the puppet usurper, Oliver Cromwell, the English people rebelled, wanting the return of their king, and backing up that desire up by disinterring the body of Oliver Cromwell and displaying the disinterred body at Tybourne Cross, the traditional execution place of convicted criminals.
Charles’ son, Charles II was then recognized as king, but in the succession of his reign, his brother, James II, the Jews recruited some English elite to their cause, including an ancestor of Winston Churchill, who was well rewarded, and brought in their new puppet, William of Orange, a Dutchman, but a Dutchman married to James II’s daughter, Mary. James II seeing his head imperiled, then fled to France and the Jews called his retreat an abdication. Ever since, the English kings and queens have not ruled by Divine Right, but by their installation by Jewish bankers, who are the real rulers, or the men behind the curtain as described by their Jew Benjamin Disraeli.
So, the England of 1776 was not a monarchy by any means, but it is under such “Monarchy” that the United States came into being by being pried away from English king and Parliament by the Jewish Bank of England. And subsequently, all of the monarchs across the world were taken down but, in some cases, left standing in appearance, as in England beginning with Wiiliam of Orange or the reign of William & Mary. But what took the monarchy’s place? Democracy, the new normal that isn’t normal at all.
The creation of the United States was a new type of country, one not founded by a monarch but rather by Jewish overlordship masquerading as a people’s rebellion. The rebellion was “won,” and later capped with a Democracy crafted by the Founding Fathers. This was a work in progress, how to manage a country without a monarch. The solution was a congress of officials, spread so thin, that they were voted into office more by faith, because nobody knew them. And their short tenure gave them little time to accumulate wealth but had the unqualified advantage that the public was given the opportunity to vote the rascals out with some frequency, giving the appearance of Democracy at work, serving The People.
This new Democracy was attended by a “Constitution” that purported to lay out the “Supreme Law of the Land.” But no sooner had the ink dried than the “Constitution” was violated and not by a minor magistrate, but by the chief magistrate, the President. As President John Adams was making his way north, attended by adulatory cannon fire, a patron at a nearby tavern, hearing the cannonade, suggested they save a cannon ball for the President’s rump. This came to the President’s attention, and the man was jailed for his ill considered and inflammatory speech. This went directly against Constitutional guarantees of free-speech. Yes, politics is a rough business particularly in a Democracy, that gives every citizen a voice, sort of.
The man’s speech was certainly intemperate, and had John Adams instead been King John, the man’s head may very well have been removed from his body, but in such a case, one might excuse the king’s actions as being sort of a rough and ready justice. The problem with the event as it really played out, was that the man’s life was spared, certainly, but the overall effect could not by anybody, except perhaps by the President, be called justice. The result was disorder, is there or is there not free-speech – which is it?
That is the problem with Democracy, they say the people are in charge but that is like turning a ship over to the crew, will they ever reach port? Nobody knows. Or how about a company turned over to the employees, will anything ever get made, most probably not. The missing ingredient is order, and order is a state of being that serves the entire company, more or less well, most of the time. It is order that not only allows people to produce, but gives people an identity. There is an undisputed leader in all human order that also confers identity.
I remember watching a black woman being told that due to some new development in DNA tracing, she could finally learn from which country in Africa she came, or her people came; she was ecstatic. Think of the flowers and floral arrangements that filled the entrance to Buckingham Palace when Lady Diana died, it was an enormous display by people who knew Diana only as the Princess of Wales. It was a yearning of the people for identity and that is what Diana gave them, somebody glamorous and beautiful, whom they became part of as, not Britons, but English. Diana Spencer was from an old aristocratic English family line, perhaps more noble than the royal “Windsors.” Diana was in reality, the Queen, deriving her power from her people. And she certainly had power!
So not only does the king provide order but identity as well. And perhaps most important of all, a king concentrates the people’s wishes which is to say their power. If the people decide something needs changing, this is brought to the king’s attention and wishing to attain a state of approval for his reign, he will cause the change to be made. It is true, the king will no doubt have advisors and ministers, but it is the collective of the people who are in charge, and it is they the king wishes to serve.
And the king is best served by a prosperous people who become more prosperous as they apply greater diligence and effort to their work. Or to use a modern measure, correlation, there will be a very high correlation between the understood will of the people and the policies of the government. As it stands now in our “Democracy,” a study made of the correlation between what is measured as the public will and the actual legislation passed, found that there is either no correlation or even negative correlation; legislation contrary to the understood will of the people.
This may come as a surprise to the student of politics but be assured, this is well traveled territory, the mis-correlation of people and their government is the end product of very well thought out strategy and action. Long ago it was decided that monarchies were bad for business and so slowly, almost imperceptibly, they were done away with. It turned out that in the contest between soldiers and bankers, the bankers won by merely paying for more soldiers on their side. That is how Charles I lost the English Civil War and how he lost his head. He was outspent by those who create money.
Then perceiving that subterfuge would be cheaper than force going forward, the bankers turned to the creation of theater as well as that of money. As an example of the elaborate theatrical measures employed by the Jewish central bankers, I cite the demolition of the Twin Towers in New York City on September 11, 2001.
The Twin Towers were constructed by the Rockefeller family as ”The World Trade Center,” in 1973 in lower Manhattan, as an alternative to the “Midtown” commercial office space market, that was the perhaps the most desirable office destination in the world at that time. The beauty of ”Midtown” was that it was accessible by two train stations for international travelers and suburban as well as urban workers, and had thus become a universally recognized magnet. The Rockefellers, went against this behemoth by situating two huge towers in the far downtown area, hoping that the prestige of the towers would draw in business office renters. This apparently did not occur as attested to by the author, as a sales engineer, meeting with engineering clients who had nothing to do with world trade such as the State of New York Dept. of Transportation. The DOT was, no doubt, situated in the World Trade Center to fill up unrented office space.
The ”Twin Towers” were made the property of the New York & New Jersey Port Authority who took over its management and leasing.
The towers were each 110 stories, built as steel structures and designed to withstand the heavy wind loads experienced at that elevation and even the possible errant impact of an off-course jetliner. To accomplish that objective the building design employed two steel structures, a central elevator core and a steel box-beam perimeter of 290ft by 290ft surrounding the interior space of the building.
And to put to bed any idiotic idea that the towers were taken down by jetliners, an event they were designed to withstand, the combined mass of just two concrete floors combined with their steel reinforcement, would have resulted in any jetliner hitting the building going splat and falling to the ground, probably not even leaving a mark on the outside surface of the building. A 290ft square concrete floor, 6 inches thick would weigh about 5.5 million pounds (290 x 290 x .5 x 130 lbs/cu. Ft. = 5,466,500 lbs.) A typical weight for a loaded jetliner is around 750,000 pounds. A jetliner would engage at least two floors upon impact. Do the math.
Aside from wind-load and jetliner impact, the most urgent hazard to design for is fire. Although no steel building has ever been taken down by fire, the possibility remains and must be designed for. Fire may soften steel and remove its structural integrity. In 1970 when the towers were under design, the state of the art for protecting steel from fire was sprayed on asbestos insulation. Later asbestos was found to be a carcinogenic hazard to human health and regulations were passed requiring its removal, or perhaps in some cases, its encapsulation.
The Port Authority was then faced with the prospect of asbestos abatement in its Twin Towers and found it prohibitively expensive, apparently approaching the cost of the buildings themselves. Demolition was investigated but proved almost equally as expensive. What to do????
The solution will give an insight into the workings of the Jewish Central Bankers, who if they know anything, know how to make a buck.
The buildings were removed from Port Authority control and leased to a Jewish friend and real estate manager, Larry Silverstein, later dubbed “Lucky Larry.” Larry then insured the buildings against acts of terror.
Now, strictly author speculation must take over, since the actual reporting on what happened explains nothing at all. All under, what is suspected to be Israeli engineering and intelligence, the buildings were “salted” with explosives, possibly nanothermite, at locations that would appear to match jetliner trajectories later created by Photoshop and that happened also to be in locations connected to groups apparently selected for demolition. For example, on 9/11, L. Paul Bremer III, was scheduled to moderate a meeting wherein Marsh and Mclennen employees were accusing Silverstream Software of vast overbilling. The South Tower jetliner impact appears to have hit the Marsh and Mclennen offices, sans L. Paul Bremer III, who was “stuck” in traffic and instead went to a news studio to suggest that Osama bin Laden was the chief suspect. Bremer was then the lead U.S. official to manage U.S. occupation of Iraq following the 9/11 inspired invasion there.
Later testimony by Russian ex-military nuclear engineer, Dimitry Khalezov, included the intelligence that Viktor Bout, the Russian arms dealer whose story was featured in the movie Merchant of Death, had been tasked with getting nuclear demolition material into the basements of each of the towers. According to Khalezov, it was nuclear demolition that turned not only the buildings but all contents, including about 3,000 people, into dust. The only thing that survived was Mohammed Atta’s passport.
Then the theatrical was put together, and jetliners from several airports were purportedly declared hijacked, and their facsimiles by Photoshop, shown to have flown into the towers at the locations where the explosives had been planted, all creating a realistic bombing like visual. The towers did not so much go down but instead were turned into powder by nuclear demolition, apparently, and “Lucky Larry” then with the help of his Jewish friends in the American judiciary, got the event recognized as two separate terrorist events, doubling the insurance payout, while the same judiciary reduced or quashed any monetary settlements for the World Trade Center victims and their families.
And although the Jewish complement of workers at the World Trade Center complex was significant in number, few if any died, all receiving what former NYC Mayor Ed Koch called the “Jew Call,” warning them away. Lucky Larry himself, not intimately connected with the proceedings, apparently also got the call, and provided the excuse that unbeknownst to him, his wife had made him a doctor’s appointment for that morning, which kept him away and alive. Again, lucky Larry!
There were also intimations of additional cover-ups regarding financing Russian asset acquisition and software development that all went poof that day.
So bottom line, the Towers went down and poof, not only no asbestos problem, at least for the Port Authority or Lucky Larry, instead for them a nice payoff. So, these Jews turned a huge liability into a huge payday instead.
And now the big part of this story. What you got so far is just a day in the life of the Jews. What about the American people who ingested all that asbestos and the firefighters exposed to all that nuclear radiation and those on the other side of that insurance payout? What about them? Well, thereby hangs another tale. They have a President, their king so to speak, George W. Bush, who at first seems flummoxed by events, but soon gets oriented by his Vice-President, Dick Cheney, who affectionately may be called, just “Vice.” “Vice” tells his boss to just stay out of Dodge for time being, more instructions to follow.
Now isn’t that a hoot, or a hoot and a half. “King” George, literally up in the air, and the American people just trying to figure what is going on??? Who is in charge???
Now comes the frosting. Osama bin Laden, a former CIA “asset” when the American government needed friends to drive the Russians out of Afghanistan, is by that time set up as the strawman, or official enemy of the American people. A quote from the aftermath of the event tells the story: “The Magic Passport: On 911 Mohamed Atta’s reality-defying passport was thrown intact from a cataclysmic fireball and miraculously plucked from 1.6 million tons of debris in a matter of hours.” Yes, it was the Arabs who flew those jetliners into the Twin-Towers and the Pentagon. The recovered passport proves it.
This was then the link to Osama bin Laden and the “Terrorists,” not those terrorists in Tel Aviv but those in Bora Bora, that then kicked off a great Mideast war that took in Iraq and Afghanistan. A guess to its value – a gazillion dollars. This was intimated by Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld (Rummy) who on September 10th, the day before, announced that the Pentagon was ‘missing’ $2.3 trillion dollars. That section of the Pentagon which was destroyed on 9/11 happened to be the budget-analyst office, where D.O.D. staff were working on the missing 2.3 trillion dollars. Am I making this up or what?
This meant war to destroy America’s “enemies” and soon after, the war President, George W. Bush, affectionately known as Dubaya, back on the ground, launched a war against….Iraq??? When asked what Iraq had to do with 9/11, Bush responded with surprise: “Nothing???” Well, not exactly nothing, the U.S. was able to secure the Iraqi oil supply, that’s something for sure.
Then on to Afghanistan, where an earlier British government official and geographer, Halford John Mackinder in 1904, stated: “Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland; who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island;
who rules the World-Island commands the world.” This was, I believe, the tantalizing part, that fired Dubaya’s imagination, and then it was on to Afghanistan to subdue that rag-tag army of ragheads. And perhaps an overly jaundiced view of American foreign policy might lead one to contemplate that the poppy harvest was thus secured. Just saying.
After 19.8 years, the Afghan War, the longest war in American history, came to a close, allowing Americans to once again breathe a sigh of relief. This item from a news source: “The Taliban take the key eastern city of Jalalabad without a fight. Taliban insurgents enter Kabul, an Interior Ministry official says, as the United States evacuates diplomats from its embassy by helicopter.” Now isn’t that a hoot and half, finally revenge for 9/11 is complete!
Bottom line, what you have is Democracy in action brought to you by the Jewish central bankers, who began issuing the public money in 1694 and have been at it, delivering democracy and military force around the world, ever since. Here is a quote that fits: “…..the Russian newspaper “Towards Moscow”, of September 1919, said: “It should not be forgotten that the Jewish people, repressed for centuries by kings and lords, genuinely represent the proletariat, the international itself, which has no country.” And the author adds, later took down all the kings, replacing them with “Democracy,” the best definition of which is “Kakistocracy,” rule by the most venal.
The only leaders who ever opposed this force were Prince Charles Stuart (1745), Andrew Jackson (1832), Jack Kennedy (1963) and Adolf Hitler (1933), and alone among them all, Adolf Hitler beat the bankers at their own game. Beating and exposing the central bankers is why the Jewish central bankers brought their militaries against Germany, at first the British and the French, and when that didn’t work, the Soviets, and when the Third Reich had beaten all of them in the field, finally, the Americans, cornering a population of 90 million Germans to fight a population of 450 million. And had Germany been able to hold out another 6 months, they most likely would have won. But Germany didn’t win, but that may have been God’s plan, since Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich are more alive today than ever and burn in the hearts of those people around the world who are possibly the true Israelites and patriots of their peoples. And after the central bankers turn the world into ashes and are themselves turned into ashes, the survivors will have a king and that king is likely to be someone very much like Adolf Hitler, a leader devoted to the success and well-being of his people.
I had a personal insight into this process. I was married at age 17 to girl who turned out to be what appeared to me, to be the work of the Devil. Over that period, it appeared she was having serial affairs and I divorced her after 15 years while she was having another affair. Life with her had been 15 years of mostly work and torture and then when I divorced her, I lost everything.
Then my family came down firmly on her side; father, mother, sisters, uncle, cousin, even leaving most of their assets to her and the children. After another 15 years, I married my wife, 14 years my junior, and a very beautiful woman throughout. Early in our 30-year marriage, I described to my wife what I had gone through, fishing for some pity, and at the conclusion of which, not perceiving any sympathy in her face, I asked: “Don’t you feel sorry for me????” “No,” she answered. “No !!!!!!” I shouted, Why not???” “Because if you hadn’t gone through that, we wouldn’t be together.” I rocked back in my chair howling with laughter: “My God! The works of The Lord are unsearchable!!!!”
And so there it is folks. The works of The Lord are unsearchable, just wait, sit back and get the popcorn out. More to come. You betcha!
Oh, and the possibility that Americans will ever have an earthly king? Very remote in my view. For one thing, primogeniture was cancelled in all 13 colonies at the start of the “American Revolution,” and besides that, I hate to say this, but Americans have turned out to be, despite all of the hoopla, a very undiscerning people. They don’t know what’s going on and just throw up their hands in puzzlement, waiting for the next boot to drop. As Christ said, “…These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from Me.”
Born in Mexico City MEXICO in 1944 to a father in the U.S. Foreign Service.
Foreign Service was begun with the appointment of Patrick’s grandfather, Francis Patrick Corrigan, to Ambassador to Venezuela by Franklin Delano Roosevelt, This history is anathema to Patrick and he has always voted Republican beginning with Richard Nixon in 1968. His view of FDR is that he was one of the worst scoundrels in history. Of course, Patrick was viewed as an outsider by my family.
Patrick graduated from Ohio University in 1966 with a Bachelor of Fine Arts degree and worked as an Industrial Designer for several years before going into sales. He graduated from the Columbia University Graduate School of Business with an MS in 1985. The balance of his professional life was spent in international sales to heavy industries like power plants, steel mills, and pulp & paper mills.
His main influence was his mother, an Irish drunk who had a voracious appetite for reading, unbounded curiosity and was a severe critic of popular culture. While not a churchgoer herself, she insisted her children be given a Roman Catholic education and attend Mass weekly. Patrick remains a practicing Roman Catholic but attends Latin Mass and regards Pope Francis as the spawn of the Devil.
His mother and he differed in politics and in drinking, but little else. As she lay dying, Patrick whispered in her ear in a teasing way: “Hey Ma. How about that Gipper, huh?” He put my ear next to her mouth to get her reaction and in the hoarse whisper of the dying, she got out one last blast: “Thick Mick,” she intoned.
From there it was just using the tools he was given to gradually perceive the world he was living in, defended by his family, but inexorably falling into the hands of the Devil.
