Roll-out of 5G must be stopped!

5G relies primarily on the bandwidth of the millimetre wave which is known to cause a painful burning sensation. It’s also been linked to eye and heart problems, suppressed immune function, genetic damage and fertility problems.

The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) admits no 5G safety studies have been conducted or funded by the agency or telecom industry, and that none are planned.

The FCC has been captured by the telecom industry, which in turn has perfected the disinformation strategies employed by the tobacco industry before it.

Persistent exposures to microwave frequencies like those from mobile or cell phones can cause mitochondrial dysfunction and nuclear DNA damage from free radicals produced from peroxynitrite.

Excessive exposure to cell phones and Wi-Fi networks has been linked to chronic diseases such as cardiac arrhythmias, anxiety, depression, autism, Alzheimer’s and infertility. By Rhoda Wilson on August 12, 2022

MF And RF Radiation is a Growing Health Risk, Roll-Out of 5G Must Be Stopped
By Dr. Joseph Mercola

Exposure to electromagnetic fields (“EMF”) and radiofrequency (“RF”) radiation is an ever-growing health risk in the modern world. The Cellular Phone Task Force website1 has a long list of governments and organisations that have issued warnings or banned wireless technologies of various kinds and under various circumstances, starting in 1993.

Another long list of organisations representing doctors and scientists are also among them, including an appeal for protection from non-ionising EMF exposure by more than 230 international EMF scientists to the United Nations in 2015, which notes that:2

    “Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines.

    Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system,3,4,5 learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.”

A call for a moratorium on 5G specifically was issued in September 2017 by more than 180 scientists and doctors from 35 countries,6,7 “until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry,” noting that “RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful to humans and the environment,” and that “5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already in place.”

In an article8 on the Environmental Health Trust’s website, Ronald Powell, PhD, a retired Harvard scientist of applied physics, notes “there is NO SAFE WAY to implement 5G in our communities; rather there are only ‘bad ways’ and ‘worse ways,'” and rather than argue about who should have control over its deployment, we should focus on preventing its employment altogether.
Health Concerns Over 5G Abound

Wall Street analyst Sunil Rajgopal also warned that mounting health concerns may delay the implementation of 5G.9 Some countries have already taken steps to slow 5G deployment due to health risks, Rajgopal notes. The question is, can it be stopped?

5G testing was halted in Brussels, Belgium,10 and Switzerland are delaying its 5G rollout to create a system to monitor radiation.11 Syracuse, New York, is also attempting to set up some safeguards and has “negotiated the right to conduct on-demand safety inspections of 5G antennas,” to allay public concerns.12 According to Forbes:13

    “In New Hampshire, lawmakers are considering establishing a commission to study the health impacts of 5G networks. And Mill Valley, Calif., near San Francisco, last year banned new 5G wireless cells.”

Many other areas, however, have chosen to trust the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) and the wireless industry trade association, CTIA, which has created a “Cell phone Health Facts” website citing research showing no risk. However, if you believe the FCC is assessing health risks, you’d be wrong.

At a Senate commerce hearing (above), the FCC admitted that no 5G safety studies have been conducted or funded by the agency or the telecom industry and that none are planned.14,15 In a speech given at the National Press Club in June 2016, Tom Wheeler, former FCC chairman and prior head of the wireless industry lobbying group, made the agency’s stance clear when he said:16

    “Stay out of the way of technological development. Unlike some countries, we do not believe we should spend the next couple of years studying … Turning innovators loose is far preferable to letting committees and regulators define the future. We won’t wait for the standards …”

In light of the more than 2,000 studies showing a wide range of biological harm from EMFs, assurances from the FCC and the US Food and Drug Administration that wireless radiation exposures, including 5G, is safe, seem disingenuous at best. As noted in a Counterpunch article:17

    “Telecom lobbyists assure us that guidelines already in place are adequate to protect the public. Those safety guidelines, however, are based on a 1996 study of how much a cell phone heated the head of an adult-sized plastic mannequin. This is problematic, for at least three reasons:

    1. living organisms consist of highly complex and interdependent cells and tissue, not plastic.

    2. those being exposed to radiofrequency radiation include foetuses, children, plants, and wildlife – not just adult male humans.

    3. the frequencies used in the mannequin study were far lower than the exposures associated with 5G.”

Even so, in 2022, substantial research on EMF safety has yet to be done. In fact, as of August 1, 2022, of more than 35,000 articles on EMFs, only seven have been medical or biological studies.18 However, “none of these studies modulated or pulsed the signal as required by 5G or used other features of 5G technology,” according to Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD, director for the Centre of Family and Community Health School of Public Health at UC Berkeley.19
What Level of EMF Can Humans Withstand?

EMF exposure at many biological impacting frequencies, such as those that run cell phones and Wi-Fi, has increased about 1 quintillion times over the past 100 years.20,21 Unfortunately, EMF exposure is so widespread these days, that it’s virtually impossible to conduct controlled population studies anymore, as no population is truly unexposed or unaffected. This lack of a control group makes it very difficult to determine what the real-world effects are.

That said, one controlled exposure study has been done, revealing it’s nowhere near as harmless as people think. At the beginning of the 20th century, there were two populations in the United States — rural and urban. Urban areas were by and large electrified, while rural areas were not electrified until around 1950.

Dr. Sam Milham, an epidemiologist, painstakingly analysed mortality statistics between these two populations over time, clearly showing there was a wide difference in mortality from heart disease, cancer and diabetes between these two groups. Then, as rural areas became electrified, the two curves merged.

Today, we not only live and work in electrified surroundings, but we’re also surrounded by microwaves from wireless technologies. Soon, 5G may be added to the mix, making exposures all the more complex and potentially harmful. As noted by Counterpunch:22

    “5G radiofrequency (RF) radiation uses a ‘cocktail’ of three types of radiation, ranging from relatively low-energy radio waves, microwave radiation with far more energy, and millimetre waves with vastly more energy …

    The extremely high frequencies in 5G are where the biggest danger lies. While 4G frequencies go as high as 6 GHz, 5G exposes biological life to pulsed signals in the 30 GHz to 100 GHz range. The general public has never before been exposed to such high frequencies for long periods of time.”

Health Concerns Linked to 5G Exposure

The added concern 5G brings is the addition of the millimetre wave (“MMW”). This bandwidth, which runs from 30 gigahertz (GHz) to 300GHz,23 is known to penetrate up to 2 millimetres into human skin tissue,24,25 causing a burning sensation.

This is precisely why MMW was chosen for use in crowd control weapons (Active Denial Systems) by the US Department of Defense.26 MMW is also used in so-called “naked body scanners” at airports.27

Research has shown sweat ducts in human skin act as receptors or antennae for 5G radiation, drawing the radiation into the body,28,29,30,31,32 thereby causing a rise in temperature. This in part helps explain the painful effect. As noted by Dr. Yael Stein — who has studied 5G MMW technology and its interaction with the human body — in a 2016 letter to the Federal Communications Commission:33

    “Computer simulations have demonstrated that sweat glands concentrate sub-terahertz waves in human skin. Humans could sense these waves as heat. The use of sub-terahertz (millimetre wave) communications technology (cell phones, Wi-Fi, antennas) could cause humans to percept physical pain via nociceptors.

    Potentially, if 5G Wi-Fi is spread in the public domain we may expect more of the health effects currently seen with RF/ microwave frequencies including many more cases of hypersensitivity (“EHS”), as well as many new complaints of physical pain and a yet unknown variety of neurologic disturbances.

    It will be possible to show a causal relationship between G5 technology and these specific health effects. The affected individuals may be eligible for compensation.”

MMW has also been linked to:34,35,36,37,38

    Eye problems such as lens opacity in rats, which is linked to the production of cataracts,39 and eye damage in rabbits40,41
    Impacted heart rate variability, an indicator of stress, in rats42,43,44 and heart rate changes (arrhythmias) in frogs45,46
    Pain47
    Suppressed immune function48
    Depressed growth and increased antibiotic resistance in bacteria49

As noted in a Gaia.com article:50

    “Many scientists understand that the electromagnetic radiation leaking through the doors of our microwave ovens are carcinogenic, and therefore, can cause cancer. Most of these scientists also believe that these waves are mutagenic, meaning they change the DNA structure of living beings.51

    The launch of 5G will be similar to turning on your microwave, opening its door, and leaving it on for the rest of your life. There’s good reason why hundreds of scientists are taking action against the wireless industry.”

Understanding EMFs’ Mechanisms of Harm

As explained by Martin Pall, PhD, Professor Emeritus of biochemistry and basic medical sciences at Washington State University, the primary danger of EMFs, in general, is that it causes excess oxidative stress that results in mitochondrial dysfunction.

According to Pall’s research,52,53,54,55 radiofrequency microwave radiation such as that from your cell phone and wireless router activates the voltage-gated calcium channels (“VGCCs”) located in the outer membrane of your cells.

According to Pall, VGCCs are 7.2 million times more sensitive to microwave radiation than the charged particles inside and outside our cells, which means the safety standards for this exposure are off by a factor of 7.2 million.

Low-frequency microwave radiation opens your VGCCs, thereby allowing an abnormal influx of calcium ions into the cell, which in turn activates nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide which react nearly instantaneously to form peroxynitrite56 that then causes carbonate free radicals, which are one of the most damaging reactive nitrogen species known and thought to be a root cause for many of today’s chronic diseases.

For an in-depth understanding of peroxynitrites and the harm they inflict, see “Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease”57 — a 140-page free access paper with 1,500 references written by Dr. Pal Pacher, Joseph Beckman and Dr. Lucas Liaudet.

One of its most significant hazards of peroxynitrite is that it damages DNA. The European REFLEX study published in 2004 revealed the nonthermal effects of 2G and 3G radiation are actually very similar to the effects of X-rays in terms of the genetic damage they cause.58

Your body has the capacity to repair that damage through a family of 17 different enzymes collectively called poly ADP ribose polymerases (PARP). However, while PARP work well, they require NAD+ for fuel and when they run out of NAD+ they stop repairing your DNA.

This in turn can lead to premature cell death, since 100 to 150 NAD+ molecules are needed to repair a single DNA strand break. NAD+ is central to maintaining cellular and mitochondrial health, so the fact that PARP consumes NAD+ to counteract EMF damage is an important concern.
Cancer Is Not the Primary Health Risk of EMF

The voltage in your body appears to play a significant role in health and disease. Your body’s production of electricity allows your cells to communicate and perform basic biological functions necessary for your survival. However, your body is designed to operate at very specific levels and frequencies.

It seems logical that being surrounded by man-made EMFs that are 1 quintillion times higher than the natural EMF environment of the Earth may interfere with your DNA’s ability to receive and transmit biological signals.

While the controversy over EMF damage has centred around whether or not it can cause cancer, especially brain tumours, this actually isn’t your greatest concern. Since the damage is strongly linked to activation of your VGCCs, it stands to reason that areas where VGCCs are the densest would be most vulnerable to damage.

As it happens, the highest density of VGCCs is found in your nervous system, your brain, the pacemaker in your heart and male testes. As a result, EMFs are likely to contribute to neurological and neuropsychiatric59 problems, heart and reproductive problems.

This includes but is not limited to cardiac arrhythmias, anxiety, depression, autism, Alzheimer’s and infertility. Indeed, this is what researchers keep finding, and all of these health problems are far more prevalent and kill more people than brain cancer.

What’s more, seeing how many are already struggling with electromagnetic hypersensitivity, saturating cities and suburban areas with MMW radiation will undoubtedly make the problem more widespread, and make life unbearable for those already feeling the effects of wireless radiation.
Media Ploy to Detract From 5G Concerns: Blame the Russians

In a Medium article,60 Devra Davis, PhD. — a well-respected and credentialed researcher on the dangers of cell phone radiation — highlights a media trend of writing off scientists who warn about 5G dangers by labelling them “untethered alarmists … linked to Russian propaganda.”

“Could it be a coincidence that following on the heels of the NY Times story, the Wall Street Journal and the UK Telegraph have echoed the same smear of guilt by association,” she writes,61 adding:

    “These otherwise credible media sources ignore the substantial body of science pinpointing hazards of wireless radiation and 5G detailed in independent journalistic investigations that have appeared extensively in media throughout Europe and been covered by major networks …

    Could the failure to report these critical 5G issues and correct misleading information regarding health effects of wireless and 5G in the New York Times have anything to do with the their new joint venture with Verizon in 5G journalism, or the fact that the Times board of directors includes officials from Facebook, Verizon, Media Lab, and other stalwarts of the telecom industry, while Carlos Slim, head of some of the largest telecom firms in the world, has downsized and now owns just 15 per cent of its stock?”

Davis also points out a clear difference between American and Russian scientific expertise with regard to EMF:

    “The history of research on the environmental and public health impacts of radio frequency microwave radiation (‘wireless radiation’) reveals some uneasy parallels with that of tobacco.

    In the 1950s and 1960s, scientists who showed the harmful impacts of tobacco found themselves struggling for serious attention and financial support. The validity of their views was only accepted after the toll of sickness and death had become undeniable.

    For health impacts from wireless radiation, a similar pattern is emerging. Each time a US government agency produced positive findings, research on health impacts was defunded.

    The Office of Naval Research, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, and the Environmental Protection Agency all once had vibrant research programs documenting dangers of wireless radiation. All found their programs scrapped, reflecting pressure from those who sought to suppress this work.

    Russia’s 50 years of research on electromagnetic radiation since the Cold War has led to their clear understanding that this exposure does have biological effects. The Russian National Committee on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection issued a 2011 Resolution62 recommending persons under 18 not use a cell phone.”

Brain Cancer Risk Is Likely Real

While heart disease, dementia and infertility overshadow the risk of brain cancer, the possibility of cancer still remains and may be a far more significant concern for young children who are growing up surrounded by wireless technologies than we realise.

The fact is, we won’t know for sure whether in utero and early cell phone use will increase brain cancer rates until a decade or two from now when today’s youths have grown up. Mounting research suggests cell phone radiation certainly influences your risk, and there are a number of compelling anecdotal reports that are hard to ignore.

In her article,63 Davis mentions Robert C. Kane, a senior telecom engineer “had willingly served as a guinea pig for Motorola and other companies developing new wireless technologies in the 1980s.”

He developed a type of malignant brain cancer the National Toxicology Program later confirmed was a side effect of cell phone radiation exposure (see video above). The NTPs results were published in 2018. Before his death in 2002, Kane published the book, “Cell phone Radiation — Russian Roulette, “64 in which he stated that:65

    “Never in human history has there been such a practice as we now encounter with the marketing and distributing of products hostile to the human biological system by an industry with foreknowledge of those effects.”

FCC Is a Captured Agency That Cannot Be Trusted

Davis also highlights another crucial problem, namely the fact that the FCC has been captured by the telecom industry, which in turn has perfected the disinformation strategies employed by the tobacco industry before it. She writes:66

    “… [I]n 2015 a Harvard expose tracked the revolving door between the FCC and the telecom industry and concluded that the FCC is a captured agency and that ‘Consumer safety, health, and privacy, along with consumer wallets, have all been overlooked, sacrificed, or raided due to unchecked industry influence.'”

The book in question is “Captured Agency: How the Federal Communications Commission Is Dominated by the Industries It Presumably Regulates,” written by investigative journalist Norm Alster.67

As just one example, before his role as FCC chairman, Wheeler headed up the CTIA, which is the lobbying group for the wireless industry, which explains his commentary on 5G and why the FCC doesn’t believe in studying its health risks and “won’t wait for the standards.”

The book also shows how the telecom industry is manipulating public opinion by undermining the credibility of scientists that speak of dangers, cutting funds for research, publishing manipulated studies showing no harm and claiming “scientific consensus” of no harm when no such consensus actually exists. Naturally, the telecom industry also spends millions of dollars lobbying the FCC on issues that might impact its bottom line.68
5G Threatens Weather Prediction

Interestingly, aside from potential health ramifications, a global 5G network will also threaten our ability to predict weather which, in addition to putting civilians at risk will also jeopardise the Navy.69 According to a paper70 in the journal Nature, widespread 5G coverage will prevent satellites from detecting changes in water vapour, which is how meteorologists predict weather changes and storms.

Davis quotes71 Stephen English, a meteorologist at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts: “This is the first time we’ve seen a threat to what I’d call the crown jewels of our frequencies — the ones that we absolutely must defend come what may.”

Alas, the FCC ignores such concerns and, according to Davis, “weather experts within the US government are being muzzled.” In a letter to the FCC, Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., urge the agency to rein in the expansion of wireless communications in the 24 GHz band for this reason.72
Educate Yourself About the Health Risks of 5G

My book, “EMF*D: 5G, Wi-Fi & Cell Phones: Hidden Harms and How to Protect Yourself,” talks about EMF dangers, with a comprehensive resource on current technologies such as:

    What EMFs (electromagnetic fields) actually are, where you find them in your daily life, and how they affect you
    The toll that EMFs have been proven to take in conditions such as cancer, heart disease, and neuropsychiatric illnesses
    Why you’ve been largely kept in the dark about this threat to your health
    How you can actually repair the damage done by EMFs at a cellular level
    Practical strategies to protect yourself and your loved ones from EMFs at home, at work, and out in the world

You can also download a two-page 5G fact sheet73 from the Environmental Health Trust. On their website, you can also access a long list of published scientific studies showing cause for concern.74

To reduce your EMF exposure, read through the suggestions below and implement as many of them as possible. Additional guidance and solutions for mitigating electric and magnetic fields can also be found at the end of “Healthy Wiring Practices, “75 a document created by building biologist Oram Miller, whom I’ve interviewed on this topic.
Night time remediation
Use Stetzer or Greenwave filters to remove voltage transients from your electricity and use meters to confirm that they are in a safe range.
Use a battery-powered alarm clock, ideally one without any light. I use a talking clock for the visually impaired.76
Consider moving your baby’s bed into your room instead of using a wireless baby monitor. Alternatively, use a hard-wired monitor.
If you must use Wi-Fi, shut it off when not in use, especially at night when you are sleeping. Ideally, work toward hardwiring your house so you can eliminate Wi-Fi altogether. It’s important to realise that if you have a Wi-Fi router, you have a cell phone tower inside your home. Ideally, you’d eliminate your Wi-Fi and simply use a wired Ethernet connection. If you absolutely must have a router, you can place it inside a shielded bag when not in use. You can find shielded items online, or make your own using Swiss Shield fabric. If you have a notebook without any Ethernet ports, a USB Ethernet adapter will allow you to connect to the internet with a wired connection.
For more extensive shielding, you can consider painting your bedroom walls and ceiling with special shielding paint, which will block RF from outside sources, such as cell towers, smart meters and radio/TV towers. Windows can be covered with metal window screens or film. For your bed, consider a shielding bed canopy.
Daytime strategies to reduce unnecessary EMF exposure
To reduce EMF exposure during the daytime, consider using Stetzer filters to decrease the level of dirty electricity or electromagnetic interference being generated. You can also take these with you to work or when you travel. This may be the single best strategy to reduce the damage from EMF exposure since it appears that most of it is generated by the frequencies that the filters remove.
Connect your desktop computer to the internet via a wired Ethernet connection and be sure to put your desktop in aeroplane mode. Also avoid wireless keyboards, trackballs, mice, game systems, printers and portable house phones. Opt for the wired versions.
Avoid carrying your cell phone on your body unless in aeroplane mode and never sleep with it in your bedroom unless it is in aeroplane mode. Even in aeroplane mode, it can emit signals, which is why I put my phone in a Faraday bag.77 They are inexpensive and only $10 for two of them. I tested them and they are highly effective at blocking radiation.
When using your cell phone, use the speaker phone and hold the phone at least 3 feet away from you. Seek to radically decrease your time on the cell phone. I typically use my cell phone less than 30 minutes a month, and mostly when travelling. Instead, use VoIP software phones that you can use while connected to the internet via a wired connection, or better yet, use a landline telephone.
General household remediation
If you still use a microwave oven, consider replacing it with a steam convection oven, which will heat your food as quickly and far more safely.
Avoid using “smart” appliances and thermostats that depend on wireless signalling. This would include all new “smart” TVs. They are called smart because they emit a Wi-Fi signal and, unlike your computer, you cannot shut the Wi-Fi signal off. Consider using a large computer monitor as your TV instead, as they don’t emit Wi-Fi.
Replace CFL bulbs with incandescent bulbs. Ideally, remove all fluorescent lights from your house. Not only do they emit unhealthy light, but more importantly, they will actually transfer current to your body just being close to the bulbs.
Dimmer switches are another source of dirty electricity, so consider installing regular on/off switches rather than dimmer switches.
Refuse smart meters as long as you can, or add a shield to an existing smart meter, some of which have been shown to reduce radiation by 98% to 99%.78

Sources and References

    1 The Cellular Phone Task Force, Governments and Organisations that Ban or Warn Against Wireless Technology
    2 EMFScientist.org International Appeal to the UN May 11, 2015, updated January 1, 2019
    3 Environ Int. 2014 Sep; 70C:106-112
    4 Central European Journal of Urology 2014; 67(1): 65–71
    5 Fertility and Sterility January 2012; 97(1): 39-45.e2
    6 Scientists Warn of Potential Serious Health Effects of 5G, September 13, 2017 (PDF)
    7, 31, 50 Gaia.com May 14, 2019
    8 EHtrust.org, 5G and Its Small Cell Towers Threaten Public Health
    9, 13 Fortune May 22, 2019
    10 The Brussels Times. Radiation Concerns Halt Brussels 5G Development. March 31, 2019
    11 Reuters April 17, 2019
    12 Government Technology May 10, 2019
    14 US Senate, Richard Blumenthal February 7, 2019
    15, 17, 22 Counterpunch May 3, 2019
    16 Prepared Remarks of FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler June 20, 2016 (PDF)
    18 EMF Portal August 1, 2022
    19 Electromagnetic Radiation Safety. August 3, 2022
    20 Electromagnetic Health January 11, 2014
    21 Nourish Balance Thrive July 29, 2018
    23, 34 Electric Sense May 12, 2017
    24, 29, 33, 47 Environmental Health Trust, Letter to the FCC From Dr. Yael Stein MD in Opposition to 5G Spectrum Frontiers
    25 Telecom Power Grab, 5G Fact Sheet
    26 Environmental Health Trust 20 Facts About 5G Wireless
    27 Science.howstuffworks.com, Difference Between Backscatter Machines and MMW Scanners
    28 Phys Med Biol. 2011 Mar 7;56(5):1329-39
    30 Principia-scientific.org April 2, 2019
    32 Endoftheamericandream.com May 19, 2019
    35 Eluxemagazine, Frightening Frequencies
    36 ElectricSense, The Dangers of 5G, May 30, 2018 (PDF)
    37, 43, 45 A 5G Wireless Future by Dr. Cindy Russell (PDF)
    38, 44, 46 References List to A 5G Wireless Future by Dr. Cindy Russell (PDF)
    39 Klin Oczna. 1994 Aug-Sep;96(8-9):257-9
    40 Health Phys. 2009 Sep;97(3):212-8
    41 Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2003 Oct;21(5):346-9
    42 Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova. 1992 Jan;78(1):35-41
    48 Biofizika. 2002 Jan-Feb;47(1):71-7
    49 Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology June 2016; 100(11): 4761-4771
    51 Gaia.com December 3, 2018
    52 Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(2):99-116
    53 International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering and Management, September 2015; 2(5)
    54 J Cell Mol Med. 2013 Aug;17(8):958-65
    55 Current Chemical Biology 2016; 10(1): 74-82
    56 American Journal of Physiology 1996 Nov;271(5 Pt 1):C1424-37
    57 Physiol Rev. 2007 Jan; 87(1): 315–424
    58 JRS.BV EU Reflex Study Shows DNA Damage
    59 Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy September 2016; 75 Part B: 43-51
    60, 61, 63, 65, 66, 71 Medium May 18, 2019
    62 Resolution of Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (PDF)
    64 Cell Phone Radiation — Russian Roulette (PDF)
    67 Ehtrust.org, Harvard Press Book on Telecom Industry Influence to the US FCC — Captured Agency by Norm Alster
    68 Opensecrets.org January 23, 2018
    69, 72 ZDnet.com May 14, 2019
    70 Nature April 26, 2019
    73 Environmental Health Trust, 5G Fact Sheet (PDF)
    74 Environmental Health Trust, Published Scientific Research on 5G, Small Cells and Health
    75 Createhealthyhomes.com, Healthy Wiring Practices (PDF)
    76 Amazon.com Talking Clock
    77 Amazon.com Signal Blocking Bag
    78 The Global Healing Centre November 13, 2014

This article was previously published on 5 June 2019, and has been updated with new information.

Democrats BEG for covid forgiveness!

Democrats BEG for covid forgiveness after DESTROYING the lives of millions
Mike Adams
Natural News, Nov 2, 2022

In anticipation of the coming Nuremberg 2.0 criminal trials that will seek the indictment of covid co-conspirators who mass murdered millions of people across the globe, Democrats are now begging for “amnesty,” hoping we will all forgive and forget what they did to the victims. The raw tyranny and authoritarian spite demonstrated by Democrats in their mad push for mandatory vaccines, cruel lockdowns of children and the economic destruction of small businesses is simply supposed to be waved away and forgotten, according to Emily Oster, writing for The Atlantic, a left-wing globalist propaganda mouthpiece.

Oster — who pushed for vaccines, social distancing and masks — claims that the people pushing all the covid tyranny simply didn’t know what they were doing.

In other words, they were all just following orders and should therefore be forgiven. This is the same excuse offered by Nazis in East Berlin, who begged for mercy after slaughtering innocent civilians who were merely trying to escape tyranny.

According to rigorous estimates published by Steve Kirsh, Ed Dowd and others, covid vaccines have already likely killed more than one million people in America alone. Globally, at least 20 million people have been killed by these vaccines, with billions facing disability due to vaccine injuries.

An epic backlash against the tyrants

The backlash against Oster’s article has been truly epic. Across the ‘net, pundits and truthers unleashed a backlash of fury against Oster and The Atlantic for daring to suggest that all their crimes against humanity should simply be forgotten and forgiven without even an apology from those who mercilessly pushed covid tyranny (and destroyed millions of lives in the process). John Nolte from Breitbart.com probably said it

best in a recent article, stating:

There will be no forgiveness before there’s a reckoning for the mercenary liars who abused our elderly and children.

There will be no moving on before there’s justice for those who were bankrupted, fined, jailed, mourned alone, forced into lonely despair, and stripped of youth’s magic and irreplaceable moments.

Most of all, there will be no reprieve because you are not sorry; because given the opportunity, you will do it all over again; because you are vicious, heartless, mercenary, politically-driven bullies only asking for amnesty so you can catch us off guard the next time.

Nolte is correct. The left-wing covid tyrants — sometimes called covidians — have no remorse. They offer no apology. They are begging for mercy simply because they got caught abusing others, and they hope to never face the consequences for their own actions.

If you want forgiveness, here’s what needs to happen

We call for a legal and lawful process of investigating and indicting all those who pushed covid crimes upon the world, followed by prosecutions and due process court hearings. Nuremberg 2.0 needs to get under way so that the truth is told and those responsible are exposed for their crimes.

In addition, we suggest all the following actions:

1) A nationwide apology by all the media outlets who pushed covid lies, vaccine propaganda, mask nonsense and social distancing disinformation. Front page. Large font. Full admission of guilt.

2) The reinstatement of all the people fired for refusing masks, vaccines, etc., with full back pay.

3) The construction of a “COVID Wall of SHAME” monument specifically naming the criminals who are found guilty in taking part in this global covid conspiracy that targeted humanity. At the same time, we must also erect a “COVID Wall of HEROES” to publicly acknowledge those who told the truth, who stood up to tyranny and who saved lives by resisting the covid insanity. (Let’s start with Z for Zelenko…)

4) We need some guarantee that left-wing tyrants won’t try this again, because they are constantly seeking new ways to control people, destroy lives and achieve global depopulation. How can we be assured they aren’t already cooking up another nefarious toxin or pathogen to unleash upon the world?

CDC pressured FDA to approve covid vax without clinical trials!

US govt agencies were complicit in crimes against humanity yet they are being held accountable!

FRAUD: CDC was aware that “fully vaccinated” patients were filling up the ICUs, yet pressured the FDA to approve covid boosters WITHOUT clinical trials
Lance D Johnson
Natural News, Nov 02, 2022

In August of 2021, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) pressured regulators at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to approve the first covid booster shot for Pfizer and Moderna WITHOUT clinical trials. The coercion took place even though the CDC was fully aware that “fully vaccinated” patients were filling up the ICUs.

According to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by Judicial Watch, the government’s internal emails show blatant collusion, coercion, and medical fraud occurring between the federal agencies. The emails show that there was a complete disregard for vaccine safety and efficacy at the highest levels of government. The agencies also admitted yet ignored evidence that the “fully vaccinated” were filling up ICUs.

CDC pressured the FDA to authorize emergency use vaccines that they knew were damaging the population

While the emails are mostly redacted, there is enough written correspondence to show that CDC officials wanted to force out vaccines on the population, without any clinical trials and even while the data showed that the vaccines weren’t working as initially propagated.

In a conference call with other members of the FDA, Dr. Phil Krause, a top FDA official, described a conversation he previously had with CDC officials. “Take a deep breath before reading this next paragraph. On that call, the CDC evidently stated that they will assemble all the data they are aware of on third dosing in this setting and send it to us in the hope that we will (very soon) authorize the third dose for immunocompromised as part of the EUA,” Krause wrote in the Aug. 5, 2021, email.

At that time, all the covid-19 vaccines were authorized under the FDA’s emergency use authorization (EUA). At the time, there was tremendous political pressure to submit the entire population to the experimental vaccines as a precondition to opening up states, schools, and industry. Dr. Krause wrote in an email, “But it doesn’t sound like they [CDC] actually want to do a study. They just want to vaccinate these people—if I am reading this correctly.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a professor of medicine at Stanford University wrote on Twitter that the emails do show “the CDC wanted the booster approved without a trial.”

Corruption at the CDC and FDA leads to historic vaccine fraud, medical error and wrongful death

Dr. Richard Nathan wrote to the FDA, pushing for boosters because Israel had done it and Pfizer recommends more dosing. “Pfizer recommends it and I trust their guidance over the turmoil at our federal agencies. With millions of doses of vaccine set to expire, you should do what you think is best for your patients,” Dr. Nathan wrote. “I can’t believe you would get pushback from anyone,” he said to Doran Fink, who works for the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. “Keep in mind, nearly everyone in this group is six to seven months out from the second dose of the vaccine and many have significant daily exposure to the virus.” Dr. Nathan pressured.

Doran Fink, said Dr. Nathan’s post “accurately reflects more widespread thinking that I am hearing in other forums as well,” including doctors who advise the CDC on vaccines.

Another pressure was recorded in a highly redacted email to Dr. Helen Gemignani at the FDA. The email read, “We currently have a few immune compromised patients in our ICU who were fully vaccinated. It is difficult to remain patient when we are on the front lines observing this happen. We would like to initiate a third dose boost as soon as possible on our most vulnerable patients. Is there a way to expedite this request?”

“Providers are losing confidence in FDA/CDC to do the right thing for their patients,” Fink said in her emails. Just two weeks later, the FDA said they conducted “a thorough review of the available data” while authorizing covid-19 boosters for “immunocompromised persons” – even though there were NO completed trials by Pfizer or Moderna.

During the fiasco, Dr. Marion Gruber wrote to Dr. Peter Marks, a top FDA official: “We need to be given time to consider their data and cannot be pushed by these companies and, for that matter the Administration, who try to impose timeless [sic] that make no sense.”

By September of 2021, the FDA’s top official, Dr. Janet Woodcock, and the CDC’s top official, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, made a joint statement, claiming that boosters will be needed for all Americans to “maximize vaccine-induced protection and prolong its durability.” This medical fraud led to the resigning of Dr. Phil Krause and Dr. Marion Gruber, the two most honest FDA officials who pushed back against the fraudulent vaccine approvals.

With Krause and Gruber out of the way, the CDC and FDA began to approve more untested boosters on an ailing, dying, overly-vaccinated population. The disastrous covid-19 vaccine program and its trail of booster fraud continues to run amok over one year later.

Medical Ethics Versus COVID Mandates

Doctors and other health professionals have been sacrificed at the altar of money, greed, coercion from govt agencies, compromised medical boards, etc...

The Hippocratic Oath And Medical Ethics Versus COVID Mandates
By Jeff M. Lewis
American Thinker, Nov 12, 2021

I am not a medical professional and am wholly unqualified to give medical advice. I can, nonetheless, reason and observe. It is my belief that people of good will, interacting with one another in good faith, will not be prone to cause one another harm.

Sadly, our elected government, with its appointed institutions and agencies cannot be deemed to be acting in either good will or good faith with We the People. Instead, we are witnessing only their desire to “mandate” what our behavior and our care should be in the battle to manage an endemic SARS-CoV-2 virus and its inevitable mutations.

These people who deign to be our rulers and betters have lost their way. They have completely decoupled themselves from constitutional government and the sound medical ethic to “do no harm.”

Given that a pandemic has been raging across the globe these issues surrounding “good” medicine and governance are obviously a concern. Also given the morass of government agencies that have not guided us in an effective response, there are instead greater levels of fear, distrust, and frustration among our fellow citizens.

I have been reflecting lately on the precepts, medical ethics, and admonitions in the Hippocratic Oath. Consider the original Greek version (translated to English, of course):

    I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgement; I will keep them from harm and injustice

The modern version states this portion a bit differently:

    I will follow that method of treatment which according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patient and abstain from whatever is harmful or mischievous.

(Emphasis added on both versions.)

According to the Harvard Health Blog of the Harvard Medical School, the phrase “Do no harm,” is attributed to Hippocrates in “Of the Epidemics,” as follows:

    The physician must… (snip) have two special objects in view with regard to disease, namely, to do good or to do no harm. (Emphasis added.)

The admonition “do no harm” neither explicitly nor implicitly compels a priority, which is commonly heard as “First, do no harm.” It would seem intuitive, however, that the doctor treating the patient would not want the medicine, or cure, to do greater harm than the injury or illness. When attempting to correct a problem, “First, do no harm” should be inherently obvious, whether one is an auto mechanic, aircraft technician, plumber, carpenter, highly skilled and specialized surgeon, or medical doctor.

“Customer Satisfaction” and “Personalized Service” are typically how business owners view the same principle because that is how we stay in business and feed, clothe, shelter, educate, and otherwise provide for our families.

Sadly, those elected to the government who are entrusted to appoint individuals to positions in their alphabet soup of departments and agencies, who then learn their own language of catchphrases, talking points, agency acronyms, and regulations, know only one way to do things: their way, at their pace.

I will assert that the COVID vaccine mandate is not good medicine. Dr. Robert Malone has been credited with inventing the mRNA “vaccine.” He has been quoted in radio, television, and print media (too widely to list here) saying that a drive to vaccinate the general population is the wrong approach.

Well, that is curious, isn’t it? One would think the inventor of the “vaccine” would advocate for its widest possible distribution and use, just as the government is doing. However, Dr. Malone has said repeatedly that widely “vaccinating” the general public will provide an infectious virus, living in many millions of “vaccinated” hosts, more opportunity to mutate and develop into a “vaccine” resistant strain.

This concept is already common knowledge because the flu shot is perennially prescribed for those at the highest risk of a life-threatening illness from the latest strain of the influenza virus. That’s right—each year the flu shot is developed months in advance to be most effective against what the medical establishment expects to be the active strain come flu season. Viruses mutate. It’s a well-known fact. Therefore, in the middle of an outbreak of the latest strain of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, widespread use of a vaccine developed for the previous strain will enable the current strain of the virus to further adapt and mutate to avoid the “vaccine” in the future.

Therefore, the vaccine mandates are not good medicine, and violate the “for the benefit of the patient and abstain from whatever is harmful or mischievous” admonitions in the Hippocratic Oath. Those at the highest risk of death from COVID should be vaccinated but not those demonstrated to be in the low-risk groups because, if one is healthy and under 60 years old, the risk of death from an infection is less than about one-half of one percent. Those at the lowest risk should be prescribed alternatives such as preventative medicines or a regimen of dietary supplements that fortify and enhance the body’s natural immune response.

The “First do no harm” ethic has hardly been part of the government’s calculus in response to the disease. Instead, at every turn, the situation is exploited for political benefit. Pre-vaccine, the leviathan that is the American medical establishment restricted the availability and use of effective anti-viral medicines, resulting in needless death. Now, they restrict the supply, prescription, and use of these same inexpensive, safe, and effective medicines that prevent and treat COVID and its current and future variants. Instead, we are mandated only one option—their uncompromising and unshakeable reliance upon the vaccines.

Mischief, anyone?

Most recently, there is overwhelming evidence the “vaccine” mandates are now and will continue to hamper the economic recovery by driving down labor force participation. The September 2021 U.S. Department of Labor Blog reported, “The labor force participation rate is also hovering stubbornly at a basically steady 61.6%. To truly capture our full economic potential, that number needs to rise.” By mandating vaccines in the nation’s labor force for those who are below 60 and therefore low risk, there will be a backlash as many will reject getting the vaccine. If these are among those who have not been able to return or have voluntarily abstained from returning to work, how is America to “capture our full economic potential?”

Put in the context of the Oath, “according to (the) ability and judgment” of any reasonable person, how exactly are the vaccine mandates “for the benefit of (the) patient?” They are not—they neither “keep them from harm” nor “abstain from what is harmful.”

The Oath is nearly universally applicable to every single issue we face. Solve the problem! Don’t make it worse!

In their reliance upon what is theoretical, rather than the realities and empirically verifiable truths of history, all that these government eggheads know how to do, and what they think will work but rarely does, is to mandate—something, anything—and their job is done.

Their mandates are garbage and are hurting America. The world is not safer if America is diminished. Americans cannot prosper if America’s “full economic potential” is left unrealized. The most maddening part is, on every front and on every issue, these are self-inflicted wounds. America is being “suicided” by those we have elected.

Do not comply, resist in every manner possible. Our resistance will force our political opposition to further reveal their hateful, and America-hating policies. That might be what it takes to make more of our fellow citizens wake up (!) and convince them of the actual destruction being wrought upon all of us.
- - -
Jeff M. Lewis is a Christian, a husband and father, a Veteran, and a small business owner who resides with his family in South Texas.

Polio Vaccines Paralysed Hundreds of Thousands of Children!

Almost everyone is frightened of polio because we see pictures of children in wheelchairs or walking around with crutches and braces. This is the fear tactic the pharmaceutical industry uses to entice you into getting the shot. So, what happens is, millions of parents fall for it and their children are rushed off to get their “insurance” against polio.

By Rhoda Wilson on November 4, 2022

Polio Vaccines Are Ineffective and Hundreds of Thousands of Children Have Been Paralysed due to Bill Gates’ Vaccination Program

By Dr. Kevin Stillwagon

This may shock you, but many children have already had exposure to the polio virus, never even knew it and have immunity, therefore the shot was not necessary.  According to the Mayo Clinic:

Although polio can cause paralysis and death, the majority of people who are infected with the virus don’t get sick and aren’t aware they’ve been infected.

Polio, Mayo Clinic

From the same link: “In the US, adults aren’t routinely vaccinated against polio because most are already immune, and the chances of contracting polio are minimal.”

They are already immune because they contracted the virus, became immune and didn’t even know it. Most people think the shot is not necessary for adults because the vaccine eradicated polio. That is a lie.

We still have polio today, mostly in areas where they continue to vaccinate aggressively. In fact, people are warned that they will be exposed to the polio virus if they travel to countries where the Oral Polio Vaccine (“OPV”) is used. That’s because the OPV contains the complete virus that will replicate and will transmit between humans.

This brings up the concept of asymptomatic transmission. Viruses ALWAYS transmit between humans. ALL viruses do this, even the ones associated with covid symptoms. This is natural and cannot be stopped any more than we can stop the ocean tides. Whether a person displays symptoms or not is entirely dependent upon the condition of their immune system, not the presence of the virus.

From the same Mayo Clinic link: “People who have the virus but don’t have symptoms can pass the virus to others.” Put another way, if you get the OPV, you get the virus and will pass it on. What happens when it is passed on?

There are four stages to the disease called polio. How far a person progresses in these stages is dependent upon the condition of their immune system. The first stage is the asymptomatic stage and happens about 70% of the time. Many people will experience this, never even know it, and are naturally immune for life.

The second stage is the abortive stage which happens about 24% of the time. This stage has flu-like symptoms, but no paralysis will manifest. Again, natural lifelong immunity is the result.

From the same link above: “Some people who develop symptoms from the poliovirus contract a type of polio that doesn’t lead to paralysis (abortive polio). This usually causes the same mild, flu-like signs and symptoms typical of other viral illnesses.”

The third stage is nonparalytic and happens 1% to 5% of the time. The symptoms are more severe, aseptic meningitis-like, and involve muscle pain and stiffness. Symptoms will last about 10 days, and complete lifelong natural immunity is the result.

The fourth stage is the one everyone is afraid of: paralytic. This is the rarest stage, less than 1%, and can result in permanent disability. This can happen in people who are severely immunocompromised. It is important to know that some of these paralytic conditions are not permanent and will resolve themselves.

You can verify the percentages right here: Poliomyelitis, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention

As with all communicable diseases, the route of transmission is the most important to consider. For the polio virus, it is either the oral/oral or oral/faecal route. It must be ingested, and this will happen by either saliva-to-saliva contact, or by ingesting contaminated food or water. Even in America with advanced monitoring of food and water, the virus still ends up in sewage because people continue to unnecessarily expose their children to the virus in the form of a shot.

In a natural infection, after being ingested, the virus particles must get into the bloodstream. This will happen if the virus is copied inside of the epithelial cells lining the gut and released into the blood or lymph. If they make it to cells of the central nervous system, which is rare, the destruction of motor neurons (the ones that move muscles) can happen, resulting in flaccid paralysis.

Modern medicine’s solution to prevent this rare paralysis is to inject you, or have you swallow something that will result in those serum antibodies that will be in the blood to react to a subsequent infection. Those antibodies will not stop the virus from entering, nor can they stop it from spreading to others, nor can they result in the elimination of the virus from the planet. OPV cannot eradicate polio: OPV cannot eradicate polio from India: do we need any further evidence?

The OPV that is swallowed might provide some mucosal protection from a future infection because it enters the body from the outside to the inside – as a normal infection would. This will result in secretory mucosal IgA antibody production. The risk is, you cannot know how many virus particles are in the dose. There could be so many that even a robust immune system will not be able to handle the viral load. The injected version will provide no protection against infection whatsoever because it bypasses the mucosal lining completely.

Figures, statistics, charts, and graphs can be easily manipulated to convince you that polio has been eradicated by using a shot called a vaccine. They do that by conveniently changing the criteria for how the disease is diagnosed. Before 1954, physicians reported an illness as polio if, 24 hours after the examination, classic polio symptoms were present. No lab tests or lasting paralysis were required. If you had the symptoms 24 hours after the initial examination, you were entered into the books as a polio victim.

Just before mass inoculations against polio began, the criteria for the diagnosis of polio changed. The change? You must have paralysis 60 days after the initial onset.

So, this change forced the reported cases of polio to be reduced as many instances of paralysis were resolved prior to the 60 days. The cases that had no residual paralysis at 60 days had to be reported as some other illness. They were reported as aseptic meningitis. Interestingly, as the reported cases of polio went down, the reported cases of aseptic meningitis went up…way up. This was confirmed in the original 1984 version of The Silent Killers by looking at the Los Angeles County Health Index morbidity and mortality of reportable diseases for the years 1955 through 1966.

Since polio is still prevalent in the world where sanitation of food and water is a problem, Bill Gates decided to do something about it. Instead of improving sanitation to stop the route of transmission, he decided to attack the virus itself.

So, in 1988, Bill Gates embarked upon a campaign to eliminate polio from the planet, called the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has pledged over 5 billion dollars to it so far. It was supposed to eradicate polio by the year 2000. That didn’t happen so he subjected millions of children in India to several doses of Oral Polio Vaccine from the years 2000 to 2017.

The result?

Reports vary, but the consensus is that hundreds of thousands of children were paralysed due to vaccine-induced polio. Will he ever learn? Probably not. In October of 2022, he pledged another 1.5 billion dollars and extended the program to the year 2026. And he still thinks everyone on the planet needs to be “vaccinated” against anything and everything.

About the Author

Dr. Kevin Stillwagon is a retired chiropractor, airline captain, inventor, author and lecturer.  He lives in Florida, USA. The above is an article authored by Dr. Stillwagon titled ‘The Silent Killers, Chapter 6: The Crippler – Polio’.  You can follow Dr. Stillwagon by subscribing to his Substack ‘The Silent Killers’ HERE or on his Rumble channel HERE.

Covid-19: How the Greatest Crime in History

The deliberately designed fake pandemic began in earnest in the middle of February 2020. A mathematical modeller called Ferguson, working at Imperial College in London, scared the living daylights out of millions by predicting that 600,000 people might die in the UK alone. There was talk of millions being taken ill in Britain and of hospitals all over the world being overwhelmed by sick patients.

The media led the panic, as they usually do, and within days people were cancelling holidays and panic buying loo rolls, soap and loaves of bread. The British always buy loo rolls, soap and loaves of bread at times of crisis. Curiously, the people who were buying the most loo rolls didn’t seem to be buying any food though you would have thought that without any of the latter there wouldn’t have been much need for the former.

The stock market had a nervous breakdown and collapsed in a corner, as it always does at times like this, and the chap called Ferguson was interviewed and quoted everywhere sharing his gloomy predictions.

By Rhoda Wilson on November 3, 2022

Covid-19: How the Greatest Crime in History Unfolded

By Dr. Vernon Coleman

At this point, back in February 2020, I was puzzled by the fuss being made over what seemed to me to be no more toxic than the flu. Back in February 2020, I said I thought that the hoax might be part of a plan to introduce compulsory vaccination.

When I looked at the figures that were available it was immediately obvious that something wasn’t right. I expressed my doubts on www.vernoncoleman.com and pointed out that according to the WHO it was not unusual for 650,000 people to die of flu in a single season.

I started looking for a hidden agenda and came up with several.

On 28^th February I suggested that the virus might be being used to stop unnecessary travel, and to save oil for more important things like Prime Ministerial limousines and fighter jets or for flying Prince Charles to climate change meetings, or to soften us up for compulsory vaccination.

On 2^nd March I pointed out that the mortality figures which were being quoted were wrong because the authorities were only identifying people who had the disease and were in hospital. They weren’t counting the thousands of people who had the disease but had only mild symptoms. I pointed out that if 1,000 people go to their doctor with the flu, and one patient dies then the mortality rate is 0.1% but if another 9,000 people have the flu but don’t go to their doctor then the mortality rate is 0.01%.

I predicted that governments would use the crisis to create a cashless society and to get rid of old people.

It all rather reminded me of the exaggerated AIDS scare when the British Medical Association warned us that everyone would be affected by the year 2000.

On 3^rd March 2020, I warned once again that compulsory inoculation would be coming. The panic grew and people were seen walking around with plastic boxes on their heads. In the UK the coronavirus was made a notifiable disease.

Within days, doctors everywhere were warning that old people would have to be left to die because the virus was going to kill millions and every hospital bed would be needed for young coronavirus patients. On 7^th March I reported that people had been cheering at the prospect of old people dying in huge numbers. `It will clear hospital beds,’ said one commentator.

By 14^th March I was still pretty much on my own among doctors in insisting that the coronavirus wasn’t going to kill us all. I was reminded of bird flu and swine flu. I had dismissed the scare stories about those two diseases at the time but the authorities had made dramatic claims. The WHO had claimed that the bird flu would kill up to 150 million people. I said that was rubbish. In the end, the bird flu killed less than 500. The UK Government claimed that swine flu would kill 65,000 in 2009 and spent £500 million on medicines that had to be thrown away. Again, the total number of deaths didn’t reach 500. It wasn’t until a little later that I discovered that those wildly inaccurate predictions had been made by Professor Ferguson of Imperial College, London – a college with financial links to the vaccine-loving Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Ferguson had also made absurdly inaccurate predictions about mad cow disease – he had predicted up to 150,000 people could die but the total was 177. And it was Imperial College which made terrible predictions about foot and mouth disease. Ferguson’s forecasts, later described as severely flawed, led to six million animals being killed unnecessarily and cost the UK £10 billion.

Despite knowing all this, governments in the UK and the USA and, indeed, much of the rest of the world, listened to Ferguson’s predictions, accepted them with enthusiasm and introduced lockdowns and anti-social distancing.

It was clear at the time that governments would have done better to have ignored Ferguson and his team at Imperial College and taken advice from Bob the Builder or Postman Pat instead. The world would have been a better, safer place but possibly a less profitable one for vaccine companies.

Angry at the way people were being terrified by a disease which was clearly no more deadly than the flu, I made a video for YouTube on 18^th March. I called it ‘Coronavirus Scare: The Hoax of the Century’. The video was removed from YouTube and then removed much later on from BrandNewTube after that platform had been hacked. It has been rescued and you can now watch it HERE.

I’ve had a lot of abuse over the years, mainly from people hired by drug companies, but this time the abuse was phenomenal, deliberate and cold-blooded and I became the subject of a sneering, libellous, smear campaign.

I carried on making videos because I don’t like being bullied by abusive thugs, because it was clearly too late to stop but mainly because I was still angry about all the lies being told and the people being unnecessarily upset.

On 19^th March, the public health bodies in the UK and the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens decided that the new disease should no longer be classified as a `high consequence infectious disease’. The coronavirus was downgraded to flu level.

A couple of days after this momentous decision (which was ignored by the mainstream press) the UK Government introduced lockdowns and introduced the most oppressive Bill in British Parliamentary history. The Emergency Bill, which was 358 pages long, turned Britain into a totalitarian state and gave the Government and the police unprecedented powers. Public meetings and elections were banned and there were new powers relating to “restrictions on use and disclosure of information.”

Curiously, even inexplicably, much the same thing happened around the world.

Following Ferguson’s guidance, governments introduced lockdowns and anti-social distancing, told the elderly they had to stay indoors, sent thousands of elderly folk out of hospitals and into care homes and cancelled operations and other procedures for millions of cancer patients.

The disease turned out to be unique in that doctors seemed able to make a diagnosis without doing any tests or, in some cases, without even seeing their patients. The list of symptoms associated with the coronavirus grew and grew and the official line was that anyone suffering from a cough or a sneeze had the disease. Thousands of patients were sent to care homes to keep hospitals empty so that nurses could learn how to dance and rehearse their clapping. In the UK, doctors got so good at diagnosing coronavirus that Britain soon headed the world figures for coronavirus deaths. Back in March 2020, I had pointed out that anyone who wasn’t actually riddled with bullet holes was being put down as a covid-19 death and that the death totals were being exaggerated. Little did I know that even the bodies with bullet holes were being listed as covid-19 deaths. Anyone who ever had covid-19 was put down as having died of it even if they were run over by a bus or hacked to death by a mad politician. Officially, it was impossible to recover from the disease.

On 30^th March 2020, I predicted that the lockdowns would kill 100,000 to 250,000 people in Britain. I predicted that the result would be that far more people would be killed by the lockdown policies than would die as a result of the virus.

Tragically, the UK Government has now admitted that this prediction has also been proved accurate. And during the next few years, the number of deaths resulting from the closure of hospital departments will soar to unimaginable levels. Suicides, as I predicted, will soar. Exactly the same thing has happened in other countries. This is a global crime.

To that must be added the number who will die through poverty as unemployment levels soar to unprecedented levels. Again, I predicted this back in March 2020.

Meanwhile, the UK Government’s own figures proved that the number of people who died from covid-19 was less than the number who regularly die from flu.

My video entitled ‘Final, Irrefutable Proof that the covid-19 Pandemic Never Existed’ appeared on 19^th April 2021. That video was banned from YouTube and hacked from BrandNewTube but thanks to our utterly brilliant IT specialist it is now available HERE.

The mortality rates from covid-19 and the flu are pretty well identical. The total number alleged to have died from the coronavirus has been wildly exaggerated. And for the first time in history, governments have forbidden medical and nursing staff to debate or question official policies.

Government figures show that the ordinary flu can affect a billion people a year. And the official evidence shows that the covid-19 virus is less infectious than the flu. The total number of global deaths from the coronavirus is far, far fewer than the 650,000 who can die of the flu in a single season. (It is also far fewer than the 1.5 million who can die of TB in a single year – also an infectious disease.)

In mid-July 2020 we were told that covid-19 appeared to have unprecedented powers.

If you catch a disease, you will usually acquire immunity. But not, it seemed with covid-19. It was announced that immunity to covid-19 mysteriously disappears after a few months.

We were told we would need repeated vaccinations – maybe four times a year.

I reported in July 2020 that the UK Government had agreed to buy 190 million doses of vaccine for a population less than a third of that. I predicted that vaccine company shares would soar.

The rules that were introduced were unutterably stupid, incomprehensible and indefensible. The entire world appeared to be run by people who were at least one sandwich and a bottle of fizzy pop short of a picnic. You could go into a pub but not a bowling alley. You could have your hair permed and your nails varnished but physiotherapy departments were still closed. The idea was to keep people confused, miserable and damned near suicidal and it all worked brilliantly well.

Researchers then claimed that a skin rash was another sign of covid-19. Apparently 8.8% of patients with a positive covid-19 test also have a rash. No one in government realised that the rashes were probably caused by the damned sanitiser fluid that everyone was being forced to use in absurd quantities.

We were, I wrote two and a half years ago, living in a manufactured nightmare.

It was, I said, either the most unlikely badly managed epidemic in the history of the world or it is, as I described it in my video made on 18^th March, the hoax of the century. (To watch my video published on 18^th March 2020 click HERE).

Either way, we need to arrest everyone involved in the decision-making process.

Vernon Coleman’s first book about covid-19, written in April 2020, is called Coming Apocalypse. It is available on Amazon as a paperback and an eBook. The author describes how the hoax developed and predicts what sort of future we face.